What medications for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) in a male patient can cause retrograde ejaculation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

BPH Medications That Cause Retrograde Ejaculation

Alpha-blockers and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors both cause ejaculatory dysfunction including retrograde ejaculation, with alpha-blockers (particularly tamsulosin and silodosin) having the highest risk, and combination therapy approximately tripling the risk compared to monotherapy. 1, 2, 3, 4

Alpha-Blocker Risk Profile

Silodosin carries the highest risk of ejaculatory dysfunction among all BPH medications, with rates significantly exceeding other alpha-blockers (32.5-fold increased risk versus placebo). 5, 4

  • Tamsulosin causes ejaculatory dysfunction in 4-11% of patients, with an 8.58-fold increased risk compared to placebo 1, 6, 4
  • Alfuzosin, doxazosin, and terazosin have lower rates (0-1%) and carry risks similar to placebo 7, 4
  • Tamsulosin has a 9-fold lower risk of ejaculatory dysfunction compared to silodosin 4
  • The FDA label for dutasteride notes that when combined with tamsulosin, ejaculation disorders occur in 7.8% of patients in the first 6 months 2

5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitor Risk Profile

Both finasteride and dutasteride cause ejaculatory dysfunction, though at lower rates than selective alpha-blockers. 1, 3, 5

  • Finasteride causes ejaculatory dysfunction in 3.7-4% of patients (2.70-fold increased risk versus placebo) 1, 3, 4
  • Dutasteride has similar risk to finasteride (2.81-fold increased risk versus placebo) 2, 5, 4
  • The FDA labels for both medications explicitly list "ejaculation disorder" and "reduced ejaculate volume" as adverse effects 2, 3
  • These sexual adverse reactions may persist after treatment discontinuation, though the role of the medication in this persistence is unknown 2, 3

Combination Therapy Risk

Combination therapy with an alpha-blocker plus a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor carries the highest risk of ejaculatory dysfunction. 2, 7, 4

  • Combination therapy increases ejaculatory dysfunction risk 3.75-fold compared to alpha-blockers alone 4
  • Combination therapy increases risk 2.76-fold compared to 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors alone 4
  • In the CombAT trial, ejaculation disorders occurred in 7.8% of patients on dutasteride plus tamsulosin in the first 6 months, compared to 1% on dutasteride alone and 2.2% on tamsulosin alone 2

Clinical Correlation

The severity of ejaculatory dysfunction correlates directly with treatment efficacy—patients experiencing greater improvement in IPSS scores and maximum flow rates have higher rates of ejaculatory dysfunction. 4

  • Meta-regression analysis demonstrates that ejaculatory dysfunction is independently associated with improvement in IPSS (adj.r: 0.2012) and Qmax (adj.r: 0.522) 4
  • This relationship suggests that more effective symptom relief comes at the cost of higher ejaculatory dysfunction rates 4

Critical Counseling Points

Patients must be counseled before initiating therapy that ejaculatory dysfunction is a common and expected side effect, particularly with tamsulosin, silodosin, and combination therapy. 1

  • Less than 1% of patients discontinue alpha-blockers due to ejaculatory dysfunction, indicating most patients find it tolerable 6
  • Sexual adverse reactions associated with 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors typically decrease after the first year of therapy (from 3.7% to 1.5% for ejaculatory dysfunction with dutasteride) 2
  • Some patients may experience persistent sexual dysfunction even after medication discontinuation, though causality remains uncertain 2, 3

Surgical Therapy Comparison

For context, surgical interventions carry substantially higher rates of ejaculatory dysfunction than medical therapy. 1, 7

  • Traditional surgical procedures (TURP) cause retrograde ejaculation in approximately 65% of patients 7
  • Minimally invasive therapies cause ejaculatory dysfunction in 4-16% of patients 7
  • Ejaculation-sparing surgical techniques (ES-ThuLEP) can preserve ejaculation in over 90% of patients, though some degree of reduced ejaculate volume occurs in 13-44% 8

Related Questions

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.