Is volufiline effective for plumping skin in adults with aging skin or fine lines and wrinkles?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Volufiline for Skin Plumping: Insufficient Evidence

There is no credible scientific evidence supporting the use of volufiline for skin plumping, as it does not appear in any dermatology guidelines, FDA-approved drug labels, or high-quality clinical trials for anti-aging or skin volumization.

Why This Question Cannot Be Answered with Medical Evidence

  • The provided evidence base contains zero references to volufiline in any guideline from major dermatology societies (American Academy of Dermatology, British Association of Dermatologists) or in peer-reviewed clinical trials 1, 2.

  • Established treatments for skin plumping and wrinkle reduction that do have evidence include autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid fillers, topical retinoids, and specific peptide formulations—but volufiline is not among them 1, 3, 4, 5.

What Actually Works for Skin Plumping (Evidence-Based Alternatives)

Injectable Options with Strong Evidence

  • Hyaluronic acid-based fillers demonstrated 8.5-14.2% lip volume increase and significant improvements in cheekbone volume (2.3 mm increase) and wrinkle depth reduction (21.8%) after 30 days in randomized controlled trials 5.

  • Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections showed improvements in skin texture, wrinkles, and pore reduction with good patient satisfaction, though protocols remain non-standardized 1.

Topical Options with Moderate Evidence

  • Cosmetic formulations containing N-acetyl tyrosinamide significantly improved nasolabial folds, glabellar lines, and crow's feet in double-blind, vehicle-controlled trials over 16 weeks 3.

  • Multimechanistic peptide and antioxidant serums yielded 19% increase in skin firmness and 35% increase in hydration after 24 weeks, with 40% improvement in fine lines 4.

  • Fibrillin-1 stimulating cosmetics demonstrated 43% improvement in facial wrinkles at 6 months and 70% improvement at 12 months in randomized controlled trials 6.

Critical Caveat About Cosmetic Marketing

  • Many cosmetic ingredients are marketed with impressive claims but lack the rigorous double-blind, randomized controlled trial evidence required to establish true efficacy 6, 7.

  • Wrinkle formation is a complex biophysical process involving repeated mechanical strain on structurally altered aging skin with impaired collagen, elastin, and hydration—requiring interventions that address these specific mechanisms 7.

  • Without published clinical trials in peer-reviewed dermatology journals, any ingredient claiming "plumping" effects should be viewed with skepticism, as the cosmetic industry does not require FDA approval for efficacy claims like pharmaceutical products do 3, 6, 4.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.