Depot Steroid Injections for Hay Fever: Not Recommended
Long-acting depot steroid injections should not be used for hay fever management due to lack of guideline support, availability of safer alternatives, and concerns about adrenal suppression—despite historical evidence of symptomatic efficacy.
Why Depot Steroids Are Not Appropriate First-Line Therapy
The evidence base for depot steroids in hay fever is entirely historical, with no studies conducted after 1988 1. While older research demonstrated that single intramuscular injections of methylprednisolone acetate or betamethasone provided significant symptom relief lasting 1-4 weeks 2, 1, this approach has been abandoned in modern practice for important reasons:
Adrenal Axis Suppression
- A single intramuscular injection of methylprednisolone acetate causes moderate but significant hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression for three weeks, with recovery at four weeks 3
- This sustained tissue exposure to corticosteroids is suboptimal compared to modern alternatives 4
Lack of Contemporary Guideline Support
- No current allergy or rhinitis guidelines recommend depot steroid injections as standard therapy
- The historical use was reserved only for situations where "complete control of severe symptoms is judged essential (e.g. for a wedding or exam)" 5
Preferred Modern Alternatives
Intranasal corticosteroids are the evidence-based first-line therapy for hay fever, offering:
- Localized anti-inflammatory effects without systemic absorption
- No HPA axis suppression with standard dosing
- Daily control that can be titrated to symptom severity
- Established safety profile for long-term use
For severe refractory cases requiring systemic therapy, short courses of oral prednisone (5-7 days) are preferable to depot injections because they:
- Provide predictable duration of action
- Allow dose adjustment if needed
- Result in shorter HPA axis suppression
- Avoid the irreversibility of depot formulations
When Systemic Steroids Might Be Considered
Only in exceptional circumstances where:
- Severe symptoms are completely refractory to intranasal steroids, antihistamines, and leukotriene antagonists
- A critical time-limited event requires guaranteed symptom control
- The patient understands and accepts the risks of HPA suppression
Even in these rare situations, a short oral prednisone course (40-60 mg daily for 5-7 days) is safer than depot injection because it provides similar efficacy with more predictable pharmacokinetics and shorter duration of adrenal suppression 1, 3.
Critical Safety Considerations
- Depot formulations cannot be reversed once administered
- Three weeks of HPA suppression means impaired stress response during that period 3
- The historical studies showing "safety" were conducted before modern understanding of long-term corticosteroid risks
- Repeated depot injections (which some patients may request given initial efficacy) carry cumulative risks of osteoporosis, glucose intolerance, and other systemic effects
Practical Clinical Approach
For patients requesting depot steroids or presenting with severe hay fever:
- Optimize topical therapy first: Ensure proper intranasal corticosteroid technique (aim spray laterally, not medially; use daily during pollen season)
- Add combination therapy: Intranasal antihistamine (azelastine) plus intranasal steroid shows superior efficacy to either alone
- Consider oral antihistamines: Second-generation agents (cetirizine, loratadine, fexofenadine) as adjuncts
- Reserve oral steroids: If systemic therapy is truly necessary, use prednisone 40 mg daily for 5-7 days maximum
- Never use depot injections: The risk-benefit ratio does not support this approach in modern practice
The historical efficacy data for depot steroids 2, 1 must be weighed against contemporary understanding of corticosteroid risks and the availability of safer, guideline-supported alternatives that provide excellent symptom control without prolonged HPA suppression.