What is the purpose and calculation of the BISAP (Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis) score in assessing acute pancreatitis severity in adult patients?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 12, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

BISAP Score: Purpose and Calculation

The BISAP (Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis) score is a simplified 5-point prognostic tool that can be calculated within the first 24 hours of presentation to identify patients at increased risk of mortality and severe disease, with a score ≥3 indicating significantly elevated risk and a score ≥2 serving as a clinically meaningful cutoff for severe acute pancreatitis and organ failure. 1

Calculation Method

Score 1 point for each of the following criteria present within 24 hours:

  • Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) > 25 mg/dL (>8.9 mmol/L) 1
  • Impaired mental status (disorientation, lethargy, coma) 1
  • Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) present 1
  • Age > 60 years 1
  • Pleural effusion detected on imaging 1

Total possible score: 0-5 points 1

Clinical Purpose and Performance

Primary Outcome: Mortality Prediction

  • BISAP ≥3 predicts mortality with 56% sensitivity and 91% specificity, with positive likelihood ratio of 5.65 2
  • The score demonstrates similar accuracy to APACHE-II for predicting death (AUC 0.82-0.86 vs 0.87) but is far simpler to calculate 3, 4, 5
  • Critical advantage: BISAP identifies patients at increased risk of mortality BEFORE the onset of organ failure, unlike traditional scoring systems 1

Secondary Outcomes: Severity and Organ Failure

  • BISAP ≥2 is the statistically significant cutoff for severe acute pancreatitis, organ failure, and mortality 1, 4
  • For organ failure prediction, BISAP achieves AUC of 0.93, performing as well as APACHE-II (0.95) and superior to Ranson criteria (0.84) 4
  • BISAP ≥3 increases risk of organ failure 7.4-fold, persistent organ failure 12.7-fold, and pancreatic necrosis 3.8-fold 5

Key Advantages Over Traditional Scoring Systems

Timing Advantage

  • BISAP can be calculated within the first 24 hours of admission, while Ranson and APACHE-II require 48 hours for full assessment 1
  • This enables immediate risk stratification on admission rather than waiting 2 days 1

Simplicity Advantage

  • All five BISAP components are clinically relevant and routinely available 3
  • No complex physiological calculations required, unlike APACHE-II's 12 parameters 6
  • Can be calculated at bedside without specialized software 1

Comparative Performance

  • BISAP outperforms Ranson criteria, CT severity index, CRP, hematocrit, and BMI for predicting severity and organ failure 1, 4
  • BISAP shows higher specificity (91%) compared to Ranson (68-77.5%) and APACHE-II, though with lower sensitivity 2
  • The World Journal of Emergency Surgery guidelines note that BISAP was derived from 17,992 patients and validated on 18,256 patients in the USA 1

Clinical Application Algorithm

Score 0-1: Low Risk

  • Mortality risk minimal 5
  • Standard ward-level care typically appropriate 5
  • Continue monitoring for clinical deterioration 5

Score 2: Intermediate Risk

  • This is the cutoff for severe acute pancreatitis and organ failure 1, 4
  • Consider ICU-level monitoring or step-down unit 7
  • Aggressive fluid resuscitation and close surveillance required 7

Score ≥3: High Risk

  • Significantly elevated mortality risk 1, 2, 5
  • ICU admission strongly recommended 7
  • Monitor for development of organ failure, which defines severe disease 7
  • Serial procalcitonin measurements to detect infected necrosis 7
  • Contrast-enhanced CT between days 3-10 to assess for necrosis 7

Important Clinical Caveats

Limitations to Recognize

  • BISAP has suboptimal sensitivity (51-56%) for both mortality and severe disease, meaning it will miss some high-risk patients 2
  • The positive predictive value varies by population and disease prevalence 1
  • Do NOT use BISAP score alone—complement with clinical judgment, CRP at 48-72 hours, and CT severity index 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do NOT delay aggressive management waiting for BISAP calculation—initiate fluid resuscitation immediately based on clinical presentation 7
  • Do NOT administer prophylactic antibiotics based on high BISAP score alone—antibiotics are only indicated for documented infected necrosis, not for risk stratification 1, 7
  • Do NOT obtain CT scan in first 72 hours based solely on BISAP score—imaging before day 3 underestimates extent of necrosis 7
  • Remember that even BISAP score of 1-2 does not guarantee benign course—one patient with BISAP of 1 died in the validation cohort 3

Enhanced Scoring Considerations

  • Adding obesity (BMI >25) to BISAP (creating "BISAP-O") may improve sensitivity to 75% and accuracy to 92.3% for severity prediction 8
  • Consider calculating both BISAP and APACHE-II scores, as they provide complementary information 4

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.