Portable Chest X-Ray View: AP vs PA
Portable chest x-rays are performed in the anteroposterior (AP) view, not posteroanterior (PA), due to practical constraints of bedside imaging in patients who cannot stand or be positioned upright. 1
Technical Rationale for AP Portable Radiography
Portable radiography equipment is designed for AP projection because the x-ray source must be positioned in front of the patient (anterior) while the detector plate is placed behind them (posterior), which is the only feasible configuration for bedridden, critically ill, or immobile patients 1
PA views require the patient to stand upright with their chest against the detector and the x-ray beam directed from posterior to anterior, which is impossible to achieve at the bedside with portable equipment 1
The portability of radiography equipment helps reduce the risk of cross-infection and allows monitoring of medical support devices in critically ill patients who cannot be safely transported to the radiology department 1
Clinical Implications of AP vs PA Views
Image Quality Differences
PA and lateral chest radiographs are considered the reference standard and are typically higher quality and preferred over AP portable radiography when feasible 1
AP portable radiographs have significantly lower diagnostic sensitivity compared to PA views, with approximately 40% of patients with "normal" AP chest radiographs having injuries detected on CT 2
Posteroanterior chest radiographs taken in the upright position have higher concordance with CT findings than AP radiographs taken in the supine position 3
Specific Diagnostic Limitations of AP Views
AP radiographs miss approximately 16% of parapneumonic effusions compared to PA and lateral views, with PA and lateral radiographs having 83.9% sensitivity versus 67.3% for single-view AP radiographs when using CT as reference standard 4, 5
Portable AP radiographs have lower sensitivity for detecting pneumothorax, hemothorax, lung contusions, and rib fractures 2
AP views miss approximately 80% of hemothorax cases and 50% of vertebral and rib fractures compared to CT 2
When AP Portable Radiography is Appropriate
Primary Indications
Screening for immediately life-threatening findings such as tension pneumothorax and significant mediastinal injury in trauma patients 1
Confirming placement of medical devices including endotracheal tubes, central lines, and other support equipment in ICU patients 1, 6
Monitoring disease progression in critically ill patients who cannot be safely transported for standard PA radiography 1
Evaluating for unstable pelvic injuries and hip dislocation when part of trauma series radiographs 1
Clinical Scenarios Requiring Bedside Imaging
Hemodynamically unstable patients who cannot be transported to the radiology department 1
Patients on mechanical ventilation or requiring continuous monitoring 1, 6
Bedridden patients in isolation for infection control purposes 1
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Do not assume a normal AP portable radiograph excludes significant pathology, particularly for pneumonia (69-75% sensitivity), pleural effusions, or traumatic injuries 2, 5
Consider obtaining PA and lateral views in the radiology department once the patient is stable enough for transport, as these provide superior diagnostic accuracy 1
When clinical suspicion remains high despite a normal AP radiograph, pursue additional imaging with CT or ultrasound rather than relying solely on the portable film 2, 3
Be aware that AP radiographs can magnify the cardiac silhouette and mediastinum, potentially leading to overestimation of cardiomegaly or mediastinal widening 2