Melanoma: Diagnostic and Treatment Approach
Diagnosis
For any suspicious pigmented lesion, perform a full-thickness excisional biopsy with 2-5 mm margins extending into subcutaneous fat—this is the only acceptable diagnostic approach for suspected melanoma. 1, 2
Clinical Recognition
- Use the ABCDE criteria to identify suspicious lesions: Asymmetry, Border irregularity, Color heterogeneity, Diameter >6 mm (though 38% of melanomas are ≤6 mm), and Evolution over time 1, 3
- Apply the "ugly duckling" concept—melanomas often don't fit the patient's overall nevus pattern and stand out from other lesions 3
- Evolution (changes in size, color, or elevation) is the most critical criterion, particularly for rapidly growing nodular or amelanotic melanomas that may lack other ABCDE features 3
- Dermoscopy by an experienced examiner improves diagnostic accuracy beyond clinical examination alone 1, 4
Physical Examination Requirements
- Perform complete skin examination including full body surface inspection, regional lymph node palpation, abdominal examination, and documentation of lesion characteristics 2
- Examine for tumor satellites, in-transit metastases, and signs of regional or systemic spread 1
Biopsy Technique
- Full-thickness excisional biopsy is mandatory—includes deep reticular dermis and subcutaneous fat to allow accurate Breslow thickness measurement 1, 2, 5
- Use 2-5 mm clinical margin of normal skin laterally 2, 4
- Avoid incisional or superficial shave biopsies as they may miss depth and lead to inaccurate staging 5
Pathology Report Requirements
The histology report must include 1, 2:
- Breslow thickness in millimeters (most critical prognostic factor)
- Clark level of invasion (I-V)
- Presence and extent of ulceration
- Presence and extent of regression
- Surgical margin clearance status
- Histological type and variants
Staging Investigations
Low-Risk Disease (Stage I, II, IIIA)
- No routine imaging is recommended for pT1a melanomas or stage I-IIIA disease—false-positive rates are high and true-positive pickup rates are low 1
High-Risk Disease (Stage IIIB, IIIC, IV)
- Perform CT imaging of chest/abdomen/pelvis prior to surgery for stage IIIB or IIIC disease 1
- Measure lactate dehydrogenase for stage IV disease 1
- Screen tumor tissue for BRAF-V600 mutation in all metastatic melanoma patients to guide systemic therapy 1
Surgical Treatment
Wide Local Excision Margins
Surgical margins are determined by Breslow thickness 1:
| Breslow Thickness | Lateral Excision Margin |
|---|---|
| In situ | 0.5 cm |
| <1 mm | 1 cm |
| 1.01-2 mm | 1-2 cm |
| 2.1-4 mm | 2-3 cm |
| >4 mm | 3 cm |
- Margins extend to muscle fascia 1
- Modifications may be needed for functional preservation on fingers, toes, or ears 1
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
- Perform sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanomas >1 mm Breslow thickness and/or ulceration for accurate staging 1
- Consider for pT1b melanomas >0.75 mm 1
- Provides prognostic information but has not demonstrated overall survival benefit 1
- Should only be performed by skilled teams in experienced centers 1
- If sentinel node is positive, sample clinically suspicious nodes with fine needle aspiration cytology before formal block dissection 1
Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease (Stage IV)
First-line treatment options include anti-PD1 antibodies (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4), or BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations for BRAF-mutant melanoma. 1, 6
- Anti-PD1 antibodies are appropriate for all patients with metastatic melanoma 1
- BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations are reserved for patients with confirmed BRAF-V600 mutations 1
- If approved immunotherapies or targeted agents are unavailable, dacarbazine or temozolomide may be used with modest palliative activity 1
- Consider surgical resection or stereotactic radiation for oligometastatic disease (skin, brain, gut) in fit patients 1
Adjuvant Therapy
- Evaluate all resected stage III melanoma patients for adjuvant interferon therapy 1
- Patients with microscopic nodal involvement and/or ulcerated primaries are most likely to benefit 1
- Encourage participation in clinical trials for stage IIIB and higher 1
Follow-Up Schedule
Follow-up intensity is stratified by stage 1:
| Stage | Follow-Up Schedule |
|---|---|
| In situ | No follow-up required |
| IA | 2-4 visits over 12 months, then discharge |
| IB-IIIA | Every 3 months for 3 years, then every 6 months to 5 years |
| IIIB, IIIC, resected IV | Every 3 months for 3 years, every 6 months to 5 years, then annually to 10 years |
| Unresectable IV | According to clinical need |
High-Risk Patient Management
Urgent Referral Criteria
- Refer all melanoma-suspicious lesions urgently to a dermatologist or surgeon with pigmented lesion expertise within 2 weeks 2
- All patients with metastatic melanoma, multiple primary melanomas, children <19 years with melanoma, or uncertain malignant potential require Specialist Skin Cancer Multidisciplinary Team management 1
Surveillance for High-Risk Individuals
- Educate patients with atypical mole phenotype, prior melanoma, or organ transplant recipients on self-examination 1, 2
- Patients with giant congenital pigmented nevi require long-term follow-up due to increased melanoma risk 1, 2
- Refer families with ≥3 melanoma cases to clinical genetics; consider referral for 2 cases if one had multiple primaries 1, 2
- Prophylactic excision of small congenital nevi is not recommended 1
Patient Education
- Instruct all melanoma patients on lifelong avoidance of sunburns and extended unprotected UV exposure (solar or artificial) 1
- Teach monthly self-examination of skin and peripheral lymph nodes 1, 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not perform superficial shave biopsies—they prevent accurate Breslow depth measurement 2, 5
- Do not rely solely on diameter >6 mm criterion—many melanomas are smaller 1, 3
- Do not dismiss symmetric, dome-shaped nodules—nodular melanomas often lack classic ABCDE features 3
- Maintain low threshold for biopsy in high-risk populations (prior skin cancer, immunosuppression, genetic syndromes) 2
- Do not perform routine imaging for early-stage disease—high false-positive rates lead to unnecessary interventions 1