Rituximab in Membranous Nephropathy
Primary Recommendation
Rituximab is a first-line treatment option for primary membranous nephropathy requiring immunosuppression, with equivalent efficacy to cyclophosphamide-based regimens and superior safety profile. 1, 2 For patients unresponsive to initial therapies such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, rituximab is the recommended second-line agent when eGFR remains stable. 3, 1
Treatment Algorithm Based on Prior Therapy
For Patients Failing Calcineurin Inhibitors (CNIs)
- Switch to rituximab when eGFR is stable, as this is the guideline-recommended approach for CNI-resistant disease. 3, 1
- If eGFR is declining, cyclophosphamide plus glucocorticoids becomes the preferred option instead. 3, 2
For Patients Failing Cyclophosphamide
- Rituximab is recommended as the alternative second-line therapy. 3
- The 2021 KDIGO guidelines explicitly outline this treatment sequence in their resistant disease algorithm. 3
For Patients Failing Multiple Therapies
- Consultation with an expert center is advised for consideration of experimental therapies (bortezomib, anti-CD38 therapy, belimumab) or higher doses of conventional immunosuppression. 3
Standard Dosing Protocol
Two clinically equivalent rituximab dosing regimens exist: 3, 1
- 1 gram administered on days 1 and 15 (two doses, two weeks apart)
- 375 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks (four doses total)
Both protocols appear equally effective, though the 1 gram × 2 regimen is increasingly preferred for convenience. 3, 1
Critical Monitoring Parameters
Early Response Assessment (3 Months)
- Evaluate proteinuria and serum albumin levels to determine clinical response trajectory. 3, 1
- Measure anti-PLA2R antibody levels to guide treatment adjustments—antibody depletion predicts remission even before proteinuria improves. 3, 1, 4
- B-cell depletion should be monitored but is insufficient alone to judge treatment efficacy. 3, 1
Common Pitfall to Avoid
- Do not interpret persistent proteinuria alone as treatment failure—response may take 3-6 months, and serum albumin improvement with persistent proteinuria may indicate secondary FSGS rather than active membranous nephropathy. 3, 1
- If proteinuria persists despite normalized albumin or loss of anti-PLA2R antibodies, consider repeat kidney biopsy to document active disease. 3
Compliance and Efficacy Verification
- Check compliance with therapy and monitor B-cell response, anti-rituximab antibodies, and IgG levels when evaluating apparent resistance. 3
- Recent evidence suggests urinary rituximab loss correlates with treatment failure—patients with urinary rituximab ≥2 µg/mL had significantly lower response rates (43% vs 100%) and may benefit from additional dosing. 4
Mandatory Supportive Care
All Patients Must Receive
- RAS blockade (ACE inhibitors or ARBs) with blood pressure target <130/80 mmHg. 1, 2
- Statin therapy for dyslipidemia management. 2
- Diuretics for edema control as needed. 5
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
- Strongly consider prophylactic anticoagulation when serum albumin <20-25 g/L due to extremely high thromboembolism risk in nephrotic syndrome. 1, 2
- This is a critical safety measure often overlooked in practice. 1
Essential Safety Measures
Infection Prophylaxis
- Administer prophylactic trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia during rituximab therapy. 1, 2
Pre-Treatment Screening
- Screen for hepatitis B before initiating rituximab due to risk of viral reactivation. 2
Long-Term Monitoring
- Monitor for hypogammaglobulinemia with repeated rituximab cycles, which increases infection risk. 1, 2
- Counsel patients about reduced vaccine efficacy during treatment—ideally vaccinate before starting therapy. 1, 2
- Be aware of rare but serious risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). 1, 2
Evidence Quality and Strength
The 2021 KDIGO guidelines (the most recent and authoritative source) provide Grade 1B recommendations for rituximab as first-line therapy, indicating high-quality evidence. 3, 1 This represents a significant evolution from the 2013 KDOQI commentary, which noted rituximab was "not specifically recommended" due to lack of RCTs but acknowledged it as "reasonable" for treatment failures. 3
The key difference: Modern guidelines now position rituximab as equivalent to traditional first-line agents based on accumulated evidence, particularly for patients with stable kidney function. 3, 1, 2 The MENTOR trial and subsequent studies have established rituximab's efficacy, with complete remission rates of 15-20% and partial remission rates of 35-40%. 6
Special Considerations for Kidney Insufficiency
Recent evidence suggests rituximab may be effective even in patients with kidney insufficiency (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), though response rates are lower (20% at 6 months). 7 Responders showed significant improvements in anti-PLA2R antibodies, proteinuria, and maintained stable kidney function. 7 This expands rituximab's potential role beyond the traditional stable eGFR indication. 7