Management of Hematospermia
For men under 40 years with a single episode of hematospermia and no associated symptoms, reassurance and watchful waiting without imaging is appropriate, as this represents a benign self-limited condition in the vast majority of cases. 1
Age-Stratified Approach to Evaluation
Men Under 40 Years
- Single episode without symptoms: No imaging or extensive workup needed—provide reassurance only 1, 2
- Associated lower urinary tract symptoms: Infection is the most common identifiable cause in this age group 1, 2
- Persistent or recurrent hematospermia: Proceed to imaging evaluation despite age 1
Men 40 Years and Older
- Mandatory prostate cancer screening: PSA testing is required even when other causes seem apparent 1
- Most common cause: Iatrogenic from urogenital instrumentation or prostate biopsy 1, 2
- Initial workup includes:
Imaging Algorithm
First-Line Imaging: Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS)
- TRUS should be the initial imaging modality for men ≥40 years or any age with persistent/recurrent hematospermia or associated symptoms 1
- Demonstrates abnormalities in 82-95% of men with hematospermia 1
- Can identify:
- TRUS-guided aspiration or biopsy can be performed for definitive diagnosis 5
Second-Line Imaging: MRI
- MRI is indicated when TRUS results are negative or inconclusive 5, 1
- MRI pelvis with IV contrast (appropriateness rating 8/9) or without IV contrast (rating 7/9) are both highly appropriate 5
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI should be included for suspected prostate cancer 5
- Advantages include operator-independent imaging, superior soft tissue contrast, and multiplanar high-resolution anatomic evaluation 1
Not Recommended
- CT pelvis has low appropriateness ratings (1-2/9) and delivers significant radiation 5
- Arteriography pelvis has low appropriateness (2/9) and high radiation exposure 5
Red Flags Requiring Thorough Workup
- Persistent or recurrent hematospermia beyond several weeks (regardless of age) 1
- Associated symptoms including:
Etiology-Specific Treatment
- Infectious/inflammatory causes (40% of cases overall): Appropriate antiviral, antibiotic, or antiparasitic agents 3
- Coagulopathy: Correct underlying bleeding disorder 1
- Structural abnormalities: May require urologic referral for vesiculoscopy (diagnostic accuracy 74.5% versus 45.3% for TRUS alone) 1
- Malignancy: Definitive treatment of primary lesion 3
- Idiopathic cases: Reassurance after thorough evaluation excludes serious pathology 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not skip PSA testing in men ≥40 years, even with apparent benign causes 1
- Do not perform extensive imaging in young men (<40) with single episode and no symptoms—this leads to unnecessary anxiety and cost 1, 2
- Urologic malignancy is exceedingly rare: Only 0.05% of benign hematospermia cases are associated with prostate cancer, and only 0.01% in men under 40 6
- Prostatic calcifications are common findings but may not represent the true cause of bleeding 1