What is the appropriate management and treatment for a patient presenting with hematospermia, considering potential underlying conditions such as prostate cancer, prostatitis, or urethral stricture?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Hematospermia

For men under 40 years with a single episode of hematospermia and no associated symptoms, reassurance and watchful waiting without imaging is appropriate, as this represents a benign self-limited condition in the vast majority of cases. 1

Age-Stratified Approach to Evaluation

Men Under 40 Years

  • Single episode without symptoms: No imaging or extensive workup needed—provide reassurance only 1, 2
  • Associated lower urinary tract symptoms: Infection is the most common identifiable cause in this age group 1, 2
    • Perform urinalysis and testing for sexually transmitted infections 2
    • Treat with appropriate antimicrobial therapy if infection identified 3
  • Persistent or recurrent hematospermia: Proceed to imaging evaluation despite age 1

Men 40 Years and Older

  • Mandatory prostate cancer screening: PSA testing is required even when other causes seem apparent 1
  • Most common cause: Iatrogenic from urogenital instrumentation or prostate biopsy 1, 2
  • Initial workup includes:
    • Visual confirmation of blood in ejaculate (to exclude partner's postcoital bleeding) 1
    • Digital rectal examination 4
    • PSA testing 2, 4
    • Urinalysis 1, 2
    • Complete blood count, serum chemistry panel, and coagulation studies 1
    • Blood pressure measurement (hypertension is a systemic cause) 4

Imaging Algorithm

First-Line Imaging: Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS)

  • TRUS should be the initial imaging modality for men ≥40 years or any age with persistent/recurrent hematospermia or associated symptoms 1
  • Demonstrates abnormalities in 82-95% of men with hematospermia 1
  • Can identify:
    • Prostatic calcifications or calculi 1
    • Ejaculatory duct or seminal vesicle cysts 1
    • Benign prostatic hyperplasia 1
    • Cowper gland masses 1
  • TRUS-guided aspiration or biopsy can be performed for definitive diagnosis 5

Second-Line Imaging: MRI

  • MRI is indicated when TRUS results are negative or inconclusive 5, 1
  • MRI pelvis with IV contrast (appropriateness rating 8/9) or without IV contrast (rating 7/9) are both highly appropriate 5
  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI should be included for suspected prostate cancer 5
  • Advantages include operator-independent imaging, superior soft tissue contrast, and multiplanar high-resolution anatomic evaluation 1

Not Recommended

  • CT pelvis has low appropriateness ratings (1-2/9) and delivers significant radiation 5
  • Arteriography pelvis has low appropriateness (2/9) and high radiation exposure 5

Red Flags Requiring Thorough Workup

  • Persistent or recurrent hematospermia beyond several weeks (regardless of age) 1
  • Associated symptoms including:
    • Fever or chills 2
    • Weight loss 2
    • Bone pain 2
    • Hematuria 6
    • Elevated PSA 6

Etiology-Specific Treatment

  • Infectious/inflammatory causes (40% of cases overall): Appropriate antiviral, antibiotic, or antiparasitic agents 3
  • Coagulopathy: Correct underlying bleeding disorder 1
  • Structural abnormalities: May require urologic referral for vesiculoscopy (diagnostic accuracy 74.5% versus 45.3% for TRUS alone) 1
  • Malignancy: Definitive treatment of primary lesion 3
  • Idiopathic cases: Reassurance after thorough evaluation excludes serious pathology 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not skip PSA testing in men ≥40 years, even with apparent benign causes 1
  • Do not perform extensive imaging in young men (<40) with single episode and no symptoms—this leads to unnecessary anxiety and cost 1, 2
  • Urologic malignancy is exceedingly rare: Only 0.05% of benign hematospermia cases are associated with prostate cancer, and only 0.01% in men under 40 6
  • Prostatic calcifications are common findings but may not represent the true cause of bleeding 1

References

Guideline

Differential Diagnosis of Hematospermia

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Evaluation and treatment of hematospermia.

American family physician, 2009

Research

Hematospermia: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Reproductive medicine and biology, 2011

Research

Hematospermia-a Symptom With Many Possible Causes.

Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2017

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.