Is robotic surgery an option for a male patient with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Robotic Surgery for BPH

Yes, robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy is a recommended surgical option for male patients with BPH, particularly those with large prostates (typically >60-80g), and is now considered a viable alternative to open simple prostatectomy according to the 2018 AUA guidelines. 1

When Robotic Surgery Should Be Considered

Clinicians should consider open, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted prostatectomy for patients with large prostates, depending on their expertise with these techniques. 1 The AUA guidelines explicitly recognize robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy as no longer "investigational" and recommend it as an appropriate treatment modality. 2

Specific Indications for Surgical Intervention (Including Robotic Approach):

  • Absolute indications: Renal insufficiency secondary to BPH, refractory urinary retention after failed catheter removal, recurrent urinary tract infections, recurrent bladder stones, or gross hematuria due to BPH 1, 3
  • Relative indications: Moderate-to-severe LUTS refractory to or unwilling to use medical therapy 3
  • Prostate size consideration: While "large" is relative, robotic simple prostatectomy is particularly suited for prostates >60-80g where transurethral approaches may be less optimal 1, 4, 5

Advantages of Robotic Approach Over Open Surgery

The robotic technique offers several clinically meaningful benefits compared to traditional open simple prostatectomy:

  • Reduced blood loss and transfusion risk: Blood transfusions are 3-4 times less likely with robotic versus open approach 2
  • Lower major complication rate: Major complications occur half as frequently with robotic surgery 2
  • Shorter hospital stay: Median length of stay is 1.6-4 days for robotic versus longer for open 4, 6, 2
  • Faster catheter removal: Typically 3-4 days postoperatively 4, 6
  • Comparable functional outcomes: Flow rates, symptom scores (IPSS), and PSA decline are equivalent between approaches 2

Expected Outcomes with Robotic Simple Prostatectomy

Based on high-quality case series, patients can expect:

  • Operative time: Median 97-112 minutes 4, 6
  • Blood loss: Median 200 mL 4
  • Complication rate: Approximately 30% overall, with major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3b) in only 4.5% 4
  • Functional improvement: Median postoperative IPSS of 3-6 (from preoperative 20-25), Qmax of 23-24 mL/s (from 5-7 mL/s) 4, 6
  • Continence: Excellent preservation with minimal stress incontinence reported 6

Important Caveats and Decision-Making Factors

The choice between robotic, laparoscopic, or open approach should be based on surgeon expertise with these techniques, patient medical comorbidities, and prostatic anatomy. 1, 7 Not all providers have access to robotic technology, and some surgeons achieve excellent results with transurethral approaches (bipolar TURP, HoLEP) even for prostates >60g. 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid:

  • Don't assume robotic surgery is appropriate for all BPH cases: TURP remains the gold standard for most BPH surgeries and should be the primary consideration for prostates <60-80g 1, 3, 7
  • Ensure proper patient counseling: All surgical interventions for BPH can cause ejaculatory dysfunction and may worsen erectile dysfunction 1
  • Consider surgeon experience: Robotic simple prostatectomy has a relatively short learning curve for surgeons experienced in robotic surgery 5
  • Evaluate for simultaneous pathology: Robotic approach facilitates concurrent treatment of bladder stones and bladder diverticula 5

Alternative Surgical Options

For patients who are not candidates for robotic surgery or when expertise is unavailable, other options include:

  • TURP (monopolar or bipolar): Remains the benchmark standard for most BPH cases 1, 3
  • Open simple prostatectomy: Traditional approach for large prostates, though with higher morbidity 2
  • Laser enucleation (HoLEP): Effective transurethral option for large prostates in experienced hands 1
  • For high-risk non-surgical candidates: Intermittent catheterization, indwelling catheter, or prostatic stents (though stents carry significant complications including encrustation, infection, and chronic pain) 3, 7

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.