What is the recommended testing approach for a patient suspected of having celiac disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended Testing Approach for Suspected Celiac Disease

Begin with IgA tissue transglutaminase antibody (tTG-IgA) combined with total IgA level measurement as your first-line screening test—this combination has 90-96% sensitivity and >95% specificity while simultaneously identifying IgA deficiency that would cause false-negative results. 1, 2

Initial Serological Testing Algorithm

Step 1: Order tTG-IgA + Total IgA

  • Measure both tests simultaneously to avoid missing IgA-deficient patients (occurs in 1-3% of celiac patients) who will have falsely negative IgA-based tests 1
  • Patient must consume at least 10g of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before testing—gluten avoidance causes false-negative results 1, 2
  • tTG-IgA has 90.7% sensitivity and 87.4% specificity in adults at 15 U/mL threshold 3
  • In children, tTG-IgA has 97.7% sensitivity and 70.2% specificity at 20 U/mL threshold 3, 4

Step 2: Interpret Results Based on Total IgA Status

If Total IgA is Normal:

  • Positive tTG-IgA (especially >10× upper limit of normal): Order confirmatory IgA endomysial antibody (EMA-IgA) testing, which has 99.6% specificity in adults and 93.8% in children 1, 3, 4
  • Negative tTG-IgA: Celiac disease is effectively ruled out in most cases 3

If Total IgA is Deficient:

  • Order IgG-based tests instead: IgG deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP-IgG) is preferred with 93.6% sensitivity and 99.4% specificity—superior to IgG tTG 3
  • Also consider IgG tTG or IgG EMA, though DGP-IgG performs best 1

Confirmatory Testing Strategy

When to Proceed to Endoscopy with Biopsy

In Adults:

  • All seropositive adults require upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsy to confirm diagnosis 1, 2
  • Obtain at least 6 biopsy specimens: 1-2 from duodenal bulb and at least 4 from distal duodenum 2
  • Request histologic analysis with Marsh classification by a gastroenterology-specialized pathologist 1

In Children (Biopsy-Avoidance Criteria):

  • Children can avoid biopsy if ALL criteria met: tTG-IgA ≥10× upper limit of normal, EMA-IgA positive, HLA-DQ2/DQ8 positive, and symptoms compatible with malabsorption 4, 2
  • If criteria not met, proceed to biopsy as in adults 4

Special Testing Scenarios

High-Risk Populations Requiring Screening

  • Type 1 diabetes patients: Screen at diagnosis, after 2 years, and after 5 years (prevalence 5-10%) 4
  • First-degree relatives of celiac patients: Risk is 7.5% 4
  • Down syndrome or Turner syndrome patients 4
  • Unexplained iron deficiency anemia: Celiac disease present in 2-6% of cases 3

HLA-DQ2/DQ8 Genetic Testing

  • Use HLA testing for its negative predictive value (>99%) when celiac disease is strongly suspected despite negative serology 1, 2
  • Absence of both HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 essentially rules out celiac disease 1, 3
  • Do not use as primary diagnostic tool—only to rule out disease in specific scenarios 3

Seronegative Enteropathy Workup

  • If villous atrophy found but serology negative: Measure total IgA, repeat tTG-IgA, DGP-IgA, and EMA-IgA 1
  • Consider HLA-DQ2/DQ8 testing—negative results rule out celiac disease 1
  • Review medications (especially olmesartan causing villous atrophy) and travel history 1
  • If seronegative with villous atrophy and positive HLA: Repeat endoscopy after 1-3 years on gluten-free diet to confirm histologic improvement 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Testing Errors

  • Never start gluten-free diet before completing diagnostic workup—this causes false-negative serology and inconclusive biopsies 1, 2
  • Never rely on IgG tTG in patients with normal IgA levels—it has poor sensitivity (40.6-84.6%) and specificity (78.0-89.0%) 3
  • Never diagnose based on symptoms alone or symptom response to gluten-free diet—this cannot differentiate celiac disease from non-celiac gluten sensitivity 3

Interpretation Errors

  • Do not assume negative serology rules out celiac disease in high-risk patients—proceed to biopsy if clinical suspicion remains high 1, 3
  • Recognize that poorly oriented duodenal mucosa leads to misinterpretation—ensure pathologist has gastroenterology expertise 1
  • Understand that tTG-IgA >10× upper limit of normal combined with positive EMA has virtually 100% positive predictive value for celiac disease 1, 3

Special Population Considerations

  • In children under 2 years: Combine tTG-IgA with IgG and IgA deamidated gliadin peptides for improved sensitivity 4, 2
  • In IgA-deficient patients: Use IgG DGP as first choice, not IgG tTG 3

Follow-Up Testing After Diagnosis

  • Repeat tTG-IgA at 6 months, 12 months, then annually after starting gluten-free diet 1, 3, 2
  • Persistently positive serology indicates ongoing gluten exposure and intestinal damage 1, 3
  • Negative serology does NOT guarantee mucosal healing—consider follow-up biopsy in patients with persistent symptoms even with negative serology 1, 5
  • Serology has only 50% sensitivity for detecting persistent villous atrophy in treated patients 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Celiac Disease Diagnostic Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Evaluating Discordant Celiac Disease Test Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Pediatric Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.