Normal Böhler's Angle of the Calcaneum
The normal Böhler's angle (calcaneal inclination angle) ranges from 20° to 40°, with a mean value of approximately 29-35° in adults.
Normal Reference Values
Adult Population
- The mean Böhler's angle in adults without calcaneal fracture is 29.4°, with no significant differences between male and female patients, left and right feet, or across age groups 1.
- Research demonstrates that normal adult values typically range from 20° to 40°, with postoperative restoration targeting angles between 20.5° to 54.5° 2.
- A Böhler's angle of 20° or less is highly accurate in determining the presence of calcaneal fracture (sensitivity 99%, specificity 99%), establishing this as the lower threshold of normal 1.
Pediatric Population
- The mean Böhler's angle in children (birth to 14 years) is 35.2°, which is statistically significantly lower than the adult mean of 39.2° 3.
- Pediatric reference values are important when evaluating calcaneal fractures in children, as adult normative data cannot be directly applied 3.
Clinical Significance and Measurement
Diagnostic Thresholds
- A Böhler's angle below 25° is moderately predictive of calcaneal fracture (sensitivity 100%, specificity 82%) 1.
- An angle below 23° is highly predictive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 89%), while an angle below 21° is strongly suggestive of fracture (sensitivity 99%, specificity 99%) 1.
- The angle serves as a useful screening tool, with ≤20° having the highest diagnostic accuracy for identifying calcaneal fractures 1.
Biomechanical Implications
- Decreased Böhler's angle increases maximum tension values on the calcaneus and load on the subtalar joint, significantly raising the risk of subtalar arthrosis 4.
- Restoration of normal Böhler's angle is a major surgical goal in calcaneal fracture reduction, as it directly impacts calcaneal strength and joint stress distribution 2, 4.
- Overcorrection of the Böhler's angle does not appear to increase the risk of subtalar arthrosis, though undercorrection significantly increases this risk 4.
Common Pitfalls
Measurement Considerations
- Plain radiographic measurement may be difficult to apply in complex calcaneal anatomy; CT imaging provides superior visualization and more reliable angle measurement 5.
- The angle must be measured on true lateral radiographs to ensure accuracy, as oblique views can falsely alter the measured value 1.
Clinical Context
- Always compare bilateral feet when possible, as individual anatomic variation exists within the normal range 1.
- In pediatric patients, use age-appropriate reference values rather than adult norms to avoid misdiagnosis 3.
- The angle should be interpreted in conjunction with the crucial angle of Gissane (normal adult mean 113.8°, pediatric mean 111.3°) for comprehensive calcaneal assessment 3.