Is a BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene) exon 11 p.G466E mutation equivalent to a V600E mutation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

BRAF p.G466E is NOT the same as V600E

No, BRAF exon 11 p.G466E is a completely different mutation from the V600E mutation found in exon 15, and they have distinct clinical implications for treatment selection and prognosis. 1

Key Molecular Distinctions

Location and Classification

  • p.G466E is located in exon 11 at codon 466, while V600E is located in exon 15 at codon 600 2, 1
  • The American Society of Clinical Oncology classifies codon 466 mutations (including G466E) as Class II BRAF mutations, which are particularly prevalent in lung adenocarcinoma and may coexist with KRAS mutations 1
  • V600E is classified as a Class I BRAF mutation, which is mutually exclusive of KRAS, EGFR, or ALK alterations 1

Functional Differences

  • Class I mutations (V600E) are RAS-independent, high-kinase activity mutations that signal as monomers 1
  • Class II mutations (G466E) have intermediate kinase activity and signal as dimers, representing a fundamentally different mechanism of pathway activation 1

Critical Clinical Implications

Treatment Response Patterns

  • V600E mutations respond to BRAF inhibitors (such as vemurafenib, dabrafenib, encorafenib) combined with MEK inhibitors or anti-EGFR therapy in appropriate tumor types 3, 2
  • G466E and other non-V600E mutations show variable responses to targeted therapies, with Class II mutations generally showing poor response to standard BRAF inhibitor monotherapy 4
  • In colorectal cancer specifically, Class III BRAF mutations (not Class II like G466E) show a 50% response rate to anti-EGFR therapy, while V600E mutations make response to anti-EGFR therapy highly unlikely unless combined with BRAF inhibitors 2, 1

Testing Methodology Considerations

  • VE1 immunohistochemistry specifically detects only V600E mutations and will be negative for G466E 1, 5
  • The College of American Pathologists recommends that testing methods must evaluate at minimum both exons 11 and 15 to capture both V600E and non-V600E mutations 1
  • DNA sequencing or NGS is required to accurately identify G466E mutations, as mutation-specific antibodies for V600E will miss this variant 5, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do Not Assume Equivalent Treatment

  • Never treat G466E mutations with standard V600E-directed BRAF inhibitor regimens without additional evidence, as the kinase activity and signaling mechanisms differ fundamentally 1, 4
  • In melanoma with G466E mutations, MEK inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors may be more appropriate than BRAF inhibitors, depending on the functional activity of the specific mutation 4

Ensure Comprehensive Testing

  • If only V600E-specific testing (such as VE1 IHC or V600E-specific PCR) was performed, the G466E mutation would be missed entirely 5, 1
  • Request full BRAF gene sequencing or NGS panel to accurately characterize non-V600E mutations 2, 1

Tumor-Specific Considerations

  • The clinical significance of G466E varies by tumor type—in lung adenocarcinoma, Class II mutations like G466E may coexist with other driver mutations, altering treatment strategy 1
  • In colorectal cancer, non-V600E BRAF mutations (especially Class III) may retain sensitivity to anti-EGFR therapy, unlike V600E mutations 2, 1

Recommended Next Steps

Confirm the exact mutation through comprehensive sequencing if not already done, as treatment algorithms diverge significantly between V600E and G466E mutations 1. Consider enrollment in clinical trials for non-V600E BRAF mutations, as evidence for optimal treatment remains limited 4.

References

Guideline

BRAF Tumor Mutations: Classification and Clinical Implications

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.