HoLEP vs UroLift for BPH Treatment
HoLEP is the superior choice for most patients with BPH requiring surgical intervention, offering durable long-term outcomes, size-independent efficacy, and proven superiority over traditional gold standards like TURP. 1, 2
Guideline-Based Recommendations
HoLEP: Strongly Recommended
- The AUA explicitly recommends HoLEP as a prostate size-independent suitable option for treatment of LUTS/BPH (Moderate Recommendation; Evidence Level: Grade B). 1
- The European Association of Urology similarly endorses HoLEP as a size-independent treatment option with robust evidence. 1
- HoLEP has effectively replaced TURP and open prostatectomy as the modern endoscopic gold standard for BPH treatment. 2, 3
UroLift (Prostatic Urethral Lift): Conditionally Recommended
- The AUA recommends prostatic urethral lift (PUL/UroLift) with only a Conditional Recommendation based on lower quality evidence. 1
- UroLift is specifically limited to patients with prostate volumes <80g, whereas HoLEP has no size restrictions. 4
Clinical Outcomes Comparison
Durability and Efficacy
- HoLEP demonstrates sustained symptom improvement extending beyond 10 years, with one randomized trial showing superior outcomes to TURP at 7-year follow-up including better Qmax (4.36 mL/s improvement), erectile function (2.39 points improvement), and greater tissue removal (15.7 grams more). 3
- HoLEP achieves a 200% increase in peak flow rate and 75% improvement in symptom scores at 1 year, with continued improvement during subsequent follow-up. 5
- UroLift shows 50% improvement in IPSS sustained up to 36 months, but long-term data beyond 3 years is limited. 4
Functional Outcomes
- HoLEP provides maximal tissue removal and objective functional outcomes, making it ideal for patients prioritizing long-term durability and low reoperation rates. 4
- UroLift preserves ejaculatory function with significantly improved ejaculation function and bother scores at 12 and 36 months (P=0.006 and P=0.003). 4
- Both HoLEP and UroLift preserve erectile function, with HoLEP showing no significant changes in erectile function scores compared to baseline. 1
Patient Selection Algorithm
Choose HoLEP for:
- Any prostate size, particularly prostates >80g where UroLift is contraindicated. 1, 4
- Patients requiring maximal tissue removal and definitive long-term treatment. 4
- Patients on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy due to HoLEP's superior hemostatic properties and minimal bleeding risk. 1, 4
- Patients prioritizing proven long-term durability (>10 years of data). 6, 3
- Patients who can accept retrograde ejaculation as a trade-off for superior functional outcomes. 1
Consider UroLift only for:
- Patients with confirmed prostate volume <80g. 4
- Patients who prioritize ejaculation preservation above all other outcomes. 4
- Patients seeking rapid recovery and willing to accept potentially inferior long-term functional outcomes. 4
- Patients who understand the limited long-term data beyond 3 years. 4
Critical Safety Considerations
HoLEP Safety Profile
- HoLEP is specifically recommended for patients at higher bleeding risk, including those on anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy, with negligible transfusion rates. 1, 4
- Transient stress incontinence occurs in 4.2% of patients and typically resolves. 5
- Bladder neck contracture and urethral stricture each occur in only 1.3% of patients. 5
- The learning curve exists but can be overcome with mentored or self-directed training without compromising patient safety. 6
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not offer UroLift to patients with prostates >80g as this exceeds the evidence-supported indication. 4
- Do not choose UroLift for patients requiring definitive long-term treatment, as reoperation rates and durability beyond 3 years remain unclear. 4
- Do not avoid HoLEP in anticoagulated patients; this is actually an ideal indication for the procedure. 1, 4
Evidence Quality Assessment
The recommendation for HoLEP is based on Grade B evidence with moderate strength, supported by multiple randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses demonstrating superiority over TURP. 1 In contrast, UroLift carries only conditional recommendation status, reflecting lower quality evidence and shorter follow-up data. 1, 4
For the vast majority of patients with BPH requiring surgical intervention, HoLEP should be the first-line surgical option due to its size-independent efficacy, proven long-term durability, superior functional outcomes, and excellent safety profile even in high-risk patients. 1, 4, 2