Online Tools for Assessment of Work Burnout
The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is the validated standard tool for assessing work burnout, available in multiple versions (MBI-HSS for healthcare workers, MBI-ES for educators, MBI-GS for general workers), and should be administered using the appropriate version based on the individual's occupation. 1
Primary Assessment Tool: Maslach Burnout Inventory
The MBI measures three core dimensions of burnout that must all be assessed 1, 2:
- Emotional Exhaustion (EE): Physical and emotional depletion from work demands, representing the most central component of burnout 2
- Depersonalization/Cynicism (DP): Detachment from job responsibilities and interpersonal relationships, characterized by professional detachment and cynical attitudes 2
- Personal Accomplishment (PA): Sense of ineffectiveness, lack of accomplishment, and low productivity at work 2
Validated Scoring Criteria
For clinical decision-making, use the following cutoff points on the MBI 3, 4:
- High Emotional Exhaustion: Score ≥27 on the MBI-HSS 1
- High Depersonalization: Score ≥10 on the MBI-HSS 1
- High burnout on Personal Accomplishment: Reduced scores indicating diminished sense of accomplishment 3
The abbreviated MBI (aMBI) uses a nine-item scale with three items per subscale, marked on a seven-point Likert scale, where higher EE and DP scores indicate higher burnout, and higher PA scores indicate lower burnout 3.
Alternative Validated Tool
The Burnout Measure (BM) is an alternative validated instrument with confirmed three-factor structure, particularly useful when the MBI is not accessible 5. The BM's Exhaustion scale has demonstrated ability to discriminate between burned out and non-burned out employees 5.
Supplementary Assessment: Mini Z Burnout Survey
The Mini Z burnout survey is a validated brief measure often applied alongside the MBI for rapid screening 1. This tool provides a quick assessment option for initial screening before comprehensive evaluation.
Critical Implementation Considerations
Diagnostic Limitations
The MBI should not be used as a standalone diagnostic tool in clinical populations 4. When used alone, the MBI shows:
- Sensitivity of 78% and specificity of only 48% at optimal cutoff (3.50 on Exhaustion subscale) 4
- Kappa agreement of only 0.25 with structured diagnostic interviews 4
- High probability of overdiagnosing burnout when used in isolation 4
Proper Clinical Application
For individuals with suspected burnout, particularly those in high-stress jobs or with mental health history, combine the MBI with structured clinical interview 4. The assessment must differentiate burnout from overlapping conditions including anxiety, depression, and other mental syndromes 5.
Contextual Assessment Requirements
Beyond the standardized tool, evaluate these specific burnout drivers 2:
- Workload factors: Excessive work hours, inadequate recuperation time, number of on-call days per week 2, 3
- Work-life integration: Poor boundaries between professional and personal life 2
- Organizational alignment: Misalignment between individual and organizational values 2
- Social support: Lack of community, trust, or effective conflict resolution at work 2
- Meaning in work: Loss of sense of purpose or professional fulfillment 2
Occupational-Specific Versions
Select the appropriate MBI version based on occupation 6, 7:
- MBI-HSS (Human Services Survey): For healthcare providers and professional caregivers 6, 7
- MBI-ES (Educators Survey): For professional educators 6, 7
- MBI-GS (General Survey): For other workers including correctional officers and general workforce 6, 7
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not rely solely on self-reported burnout assessment without clinical correlation 4. The healthy worker bias affects burnout research, as most studies only investigate working employees who are relatively healthy, missing those who have already left work due to burnout 5.
Recognize that burnout rarely occurs in isolation 8. It commonly clusters with sleep disturbances, emotional distress, or pain, requiring holistic assessment of these co-occurring conditions 8.