What causes heparin resistance in critically ill patients with sepsis and multiple organ dysfunctions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Heparin Resistance in Sepsis

Heparin resistance in sepsis occurs primarily because elevated acute phase reactants—particularly fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, and other heparin-binding proteins—bind to and neutralize heparin, creating a prohemostatic environment that antagonizes its anticoagulant effects. 1

Primary Mechanisms

Acute Phase Protein Binding

  • Hyperfibrinogenemia is the key factor causing heparin resistance in septic patients, as elevated fibrinogen levels directly bind to heparin molecules and reduce their bioavailability 1
  • C-reactive protein and other heparin-binding acute phase reactants are markedly elevated during the inflammatory response in sepsis, creating additional binding sites that sequester heparin away from its anticoagulant targets 1
  • These proteins compete with antithrombin III for heparin binding, reducing the formation of the heparin-antithrombin complex necessary for anticoagulation 1

Cellular Sequestration

  • Activated macrophages and endothelial cells—both prominently activated in sepsis—bind and internalize heparin, further reducing circulating bioavailable drug 1
  • The systemic inflammatory response characteristic of sepsis causes widespread endothelial activation, creating numerous additional binding sites for heparin on vascular surfaces 1

Antithrombin Depletion

  • While moderate to severe antithrombin deficiency is uncommon in most septic patients (levels typically remain around 80%), antithrombin levels can fall below 60% in critically ill patients with multiple organ dysfunction 1
  • Antithrombin levels decrease in sepsis through multiple mechanisms: increased vascular permeability causing extravasation, consumption by pathologically activated coagulation, cleavage by proteases, and decreased hepatic synthesis during acute hepatic dysfunction 1
  • Since heparin requires antithrombin to exert its anticoagulant effect, even modest reductions in antithrombin levels can contribute to apparent heparin resistance 1

Additional Contributing Factors

Thrombocytosis

  • Excessive thrombopoietin production by the liver during sepsis can cause thrombocytosis, which has been suggested as an additional mechanism for heparin resistance 1
  • Elevated platelet counts provide more surface area for thrombin generation, potentially overwhelming heparin's anticoagulant capacity 1

Hypercoagulability

  • The FDA label specifically notes that heparin resistance is frequently encountered in fever, thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, and infections with thrombosing tendencies 2
  • Sepsis-induced coagulopathy involves systemic activation of coagulation with suppression of fibrinolysis, creating a prothrombotic state that requires higher heparin doses to overcome 1

Clinical Definition and Recognition

  • Heparin resistance is defined as requiring daily UFH doses exceeding 35,000 units to achieve therapeutic aPTT or the inability to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation despite high doses 1, 3
  • The FDA label recommends close monitoring of coagulation tests in patients with fever, thrombosis, and infections, as these conditions frequently cause heparin resistance 2

Practical Management Strategies

Monitoring Approach

  • Measure both aPTT and concomitant anti-factor Xa heparin levels when heparin resistance is suspected, as aPTT may be unreliable in inflammatory states 1
  • The FDA label recommends adjustment of heparin doses based on anti-Factor Xa levels in cases of suspected resistance 2
  • Point-of-care aPTT testing may be influenced by elevated acute phase reactants, making anti-Xa monitoring more reliable in septic patients 1, 4

Alternative Anticoagulation

  • If monitoring is impractical or resistance persists, consider longer-acting, non-aPTT adjusted subcutaneous fondaparinux or danaparoid if renal function is normal 1
  • Prophylactic-dose LMWH (dalteparin) has been studied in critically ill patients with markedly impaired renal function without adverse effects 1
  • Direct thrombin inhibitors (bivalirudin or argatroban) represent alternative options when heparin resistance cannot be overcome 4

Antithrombin Supplementation

  • While antithrombin supplementation is theoretically attractive for overcoming heparin resistance, large trials have not demonstrated mortality benefit, and concomitant heparin administration may impair antithrombin's beneficial effects 1
  • Subgroup analyses suggest antithrombin may be effective in septic patients with coagulopathy who are not receiving concurrent heparin 1

Common Pitfalls

  • Do not assume therapeutic anticoagulation based solely on aPTT in septic patients—inflammatory mediators can prolong aPTT independent of heparin effect, while acute phase reactants can normalize aPTT despite subtherapeutic anticoagulation 1, 4
  • Avoid attributing all cases of elevated heparin requirements to "resistance"—ensure weight-based dosing is being used, as early reports of resistance used total daily doses without weight adjustment 4
  • Consider that lupus anticoagulants and antiphospholipid antibodies can develop during severe infections and may confound aPTT-based monitoring 1, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

To be or not to be a case of heparin resistance.

Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 2018

Research

Troubleshooting heparin resistance.

Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.