What are the guidelines for using Upadacitinib (Rinvoq) in adult patients with active spondyloarthritis, including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis, who have had an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Upadacitinib in Spondyloarthritis: Guideline-Based Recommendations

Upadacitinib 15 mg once daily is recommended for adult patients with active spondyloarthritis (including ankylosing spondylitis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis) who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to at least one biologic DMARD, with important safety considerations required for patients ≥65 years, smokers, and those with cardiovascular risk factors. 1, 2

FDA-Approved Indications for Spondyloarthritis

Upadacitinib is FDA-approved for three distinct spondyloarthritis conditions 2:

  • Ankylosing Spondylitis: Adults with active disease who have had inadequate response or intolerance to one or more TNF blockers, dosed at 15 mg once daily 2
  • Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: Adults with active disease and objective signs of inflammation who have had inadequate response or intolerance to TNF blocker therapy, dosed at 15 mg once daily 2
  • Psoriatic Arthritis: Adults and pediatric patients ≥2 years with active disease who have had inadequate response or intolerance to one or more TNF blockers 2

Treatment Algorithm by Disease Manifestation

For Peripheral Arthritis (Psoriatic Arthritis)

Step 1: Initiate conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) rapidly, with methotrexate preferred if clinically relevant skin involvement is present 1

Step 2: If inadequate response to at least one csDMARD, commence biologic DMARD therapy 1

Step 3: Upadacitinib may be considered after inadequate response to at least one bDMARD, or when a bDMARD is not appropriate, taking safety considerations into account 1

  • This represents Level 1b evidence with Grade B recommendation and 9.1/10 expert agreement 1
  • JAK inhibitors (including upadacitinib and tofacitinib) are positioned after bDMARD failure in the 2023 EULAR guidelines 1

For Axial Disease (Ankylosing Spondylitis, Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis, or Axial PsA)

Step 1: NSAIDs as first-line therapy for insufficient response 1

Step 2: For clinically relevant axial disease with insufficient response to NSAIDs, therapy with an IL-17A inhibitor, TNF inhibitor, IL-17A/F inhibitor, or JAK inhibitor should be considered 1

  • This represents Level 1b evidence with Grade B recommendation and 9.4/10 expert agreement 1
  • Upadacitinib is explicitly included as an option alongside biologics for axial manifestations in the 2023 EULAR update 1

For Enthesitis

If unequivocal enthesitis with insufficient response to NSAIDs or local glucocorticoid injections, therapy with a bDMARD should be considered first 1

Critical Safety Considerations

Mandatory safety precautions for JAK inhibitors, including upadacitinib 1:

  • Age ≥65 years: Exercise caution due to increased risk of adverse events 1
  • Current or past long-time smokers: Increased risk profile requires careful consideration 1
  • History of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors: Higher rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) observed with JAK inhibitors versus TNF blockers 1, 2
  • Malignancy risk factors: Increased consideration needed 1
  • Known risk factors for venous thromboembolism: Thrombosis has occurred in patients treated with JAK inhibitors, with increased incidence of pulmonary embolism and venous/arterial thrombosis versus TNF blockers 1, 2

Efficacy Data Supporting Use

Ankylosing Spondylitis (Biologic-Refractory)

In patients with active AS and inadequate response to 1-2 bDMARDs (TNF or IL-17 inhibitors) 3:

  • 45% achieved ASAS40 at week 14 versus 18% with placebo (p<0.0001) 3
  • Statistically significant improvements in all multiplicity-controlled secondary endpoints including ASDAS, MRI spine inflammation, pain measures, BASFI, and BASMI 3
  • Sustained efficacy through 52 weeks with 66% achieving ASAS40, 57% achieving ASDAS low disease activity, and 26% achieving ASDAS inactive disease 4

Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis

In patients with active disease and objective signs of inflammation 5:

  • 45% achieved ASAS40 at week 14 versus 23% with placebo (p<0.0001) 5
  • Treatment difference of 22% (95% CI 12-32%) 5

Psoriatic Arthritis (Biologic-Refractory)

In patients with inadequate response or intolerance to at least one biologic DMARD 6:

  • 56.9% (15 mg) and 63.8% (30 mg) achieved ACR20 at week 12 versus 24.1% with placebo (p<0.001) 6
  • 25.1% (15 mg) and 28.9% (30 mg) achieved minimal disease activity at week 24 versus 2.8% with placebo (p<0.001) 6

Dosing Specifications

Standard dosing for all spondyloarthritis indications: 15 mg once daily orally 2

Do not use in combination with 2:

  • Other JAK inhibitors
  • Biologic DMARDs
  • Potent immunosuppressants (azathioprine, cyclosporine)

Positioning Relative to Other Therapies

When to Choose Upadacitinib Over Other Options

For axial manifestations: Upadacitinib is positioned as an equal option alongside IL-17 and TNF inhibitors after NSAID failure, representing a significant advancement from prior guidelines that reserved JAK inhibitors for later lines 1

For peripheral arthritis: Upadacitinib is positioned after bDMARD failure or when bDMARDs are not appropriate 1

For inflammatory bowel disease comorbidity: JAK inhibitors (including upadacitinib) may be preferred over IL-17 inhibitors, as anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies, IL-23 inhibitors, IL-12/23 inhibitors, or JAK inhibitors are recommended for IBD 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not use upadacitinib as first-line therapy before trying NSAIDs in axial disease or csDMARDs in peripheral arthritis 1, 2

Do not overlook safety screening: Prior to treatment, update immunizations and evaluate for active/latent tuberculosis, viral hepatitis, hepatic function, and pregnancy status 2

Do not initiate or continue if: Absolute lymphocyte count <500 cells/mm³, absolute neutrophil count <1000 cells/mm³, or hemoglobin <8 g/dL 2

Do not ignore extra-articular manifestations: For uveitis, prefer anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies over JAK inhibitors; for significant skin involvement in PsA, IL-17 or IL-23 pathway inhibitors may be preferred over JAK inhibitors 1

Do not combine with other immunosuppressants: Upadacitinib should not be used with other JAK inhibitors, biologic DMARDs, or potent immunosuppressants 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.