Does a patient on Eliquis (apixaban) 5mg twice daily (bid) for a pulmonary embolism (saddle embolus) require a heparin drip upon hospital admission?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

For a patient on Eliquis (apixaban) 5 mg twice daily for a saddle pulmonary embolism from a year ago who gets admitted to the hospital, they typically do not need to be switched to a heparin drip. Eliquis should be continued during hospitalization in most cases, as it provides effective anticoagulation 1. Switching to heparin is generally unnecessary and may actually increase bleeding risk during the transition between anticoagulants. However, there are specific situations where changing to heparin might be necessary, such as if the patient needs emergency surgery, has developed severe kidney dysfunction, cannot take oral medications, or is experiencing breakthrough clotting despite Eliquis therapy. The decision should be individualized based on the reason for hospitalization and the patient's clinical status. Eliquis has predictable anticoagulant effects and doesn't require routine monitoring like heparin does, making it convenient to continue during hospitalization when possible. Some key points to consider when deciding whether to switch to heparin include:

  • The patient's current clinical status and reason for hospitalization
  • The presence of any contraindications to heparin therapy, such as active bleeding or severe thrombocytopenia
  • The potential benefits and risks of switching to heparin, including the risk of bleeding or thrombosis during the transition period
  • The availability of alternative anticoagulation options, such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux, which may be preferred in certain situations 1. Unnecessary switching between anticoagulants can create periods of under or over-anticoagulation, potentially increasing risk of clotting or bleeding.

From the FDA Drug Label

  1. 5 Acute PE in Hemodynamically Unstable Patients or Patients who Require Thrombolysis or Pulmonary Embolectomy Initiation of apixaban tablets are not recommended as an alternative to unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of patients with PE who present with hemodynamic instability or who may receive thrombolysis or pulmonary embolectomy.

The patient is on apixaban 5 mg bid for a saddle embolus from a year ago. If they get admitted to the hospital, the FDA label does not directly address the need for a heparin drip in this specific scenario. However, it does state that unfractionated heparin is recommended for the initial treatment of patients with PE who present with hemodynamic instability or who may receive thrombolysis or pulmonary embolectomy 2. Since the patient's current condition is not specified, it is unclear if they require a heparin drip. As a conservative clinical decision, it would be prudent to consider the patient's current clinical status and consult with a healthcare professional to determine the best course of action.

From the Research

Anticoagulation Therapy for Saddle Embolus

  • The patient is currently on Eliquis (apixaban) 5mg twice a day for a saddle embolus that occurred a year ago.
  • The question is whether the patient needs to be on a heparin drip if they are admitted to the hospital.

Current Anticoagulation Regimen

  • The patient is already on a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), which is a first-line agent for treating venous thromboembolism and preventing stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation 3.
  • The use of DOACs, such as apixaban, has been shown to be effective in preventing recurrent thromboembolism with a lower risk of bleeding compared to traditional anticoagulants like heparin and warfarin 4.

Need for Heparin Drip

  • There is no clear indication that the patient needs to be switched to a heparin drip, as the current anticoagulation regimen with apixaban is effective and has a lower risk of bleeding 4.
  • The American Society of Hematology guidelines recommend individualized assessment of risk of thrombosis and bleeding, and the use of heparin may be preferred in certain situations, but it is not necessarily required for patients already on a DOAC 5.
  • The patient's current anticoagulation regimen should be continued, and the need for a heparin drip should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the patient's individual risk factors and medical history 6, 7.

Related Questions

Is therapeutic phlebotomy indicated for someone with polycythemia (high hemoglobin) who is already on anticoagulants (blood thinners)?
What is the treatment for thrombophlebitis (inflammation of a vein caused by a blood clot)?
What is the diagnosis and treatment for a thrombus (blood clot)?
What is the recommended anticoagulation regimen for 6 months?
What is the diagnosis for a 74-year-old female with persistent headaches after a forehead trauma, with a computed tomography (CT) cranial scan without contrast showing no acute intracranial pathology, but mild venous angiopathy?
What are the management considerations for a 33-year-old postpartum woman with endometritis, hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) infections, and a history of cocaine use, who wishes to breastfeed after a cesarean delivery?
What is the diagnosis for a pregnant woman with essential hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and a fetus with bilateral renal hypoplasia and oligohydramnios?
What is the cause of postpartum low back and buttock pain in a 33-year-old woman, gravida 2 para 2, with a history of forceps-assisted vaginal delivery and epidural analgesia, presenting with tenderness over the coccyx?
What is the diagnosis for a postpartum woman with a cesarean delivery (C-section) scar dehiscence, presenting with serosanguineous fluid drainage from a 4-cm defect at the right corner of her Pfannenstiel incision, without signs of infection or uterine tenderness, two days after delivery?
What is the diagnosis for a 35-year-old woman, gravida (number of times pregnant) 1, para (number of viable births) 0, at 35 weeks gestation, presenting with fever, chills, and persistent pyelonephritis despite broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, with vital signs indicating fever, normotension, and tachycardia, and fetal heart rate monitoring showing tachycardia with moderate variability?
What is the appropriate management for a 43-year-old primigravida (first pregnancy) at 37 weeks gestation with severe headache, visual disturbances, and hypertension (184/106 mm Hg), diagnosed with preeclampsia with severe features, and having myasthenia gravis managed with pyridostigmine (Mestinon)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.