Difference Between Peritoneal Carcinomatosis and Mesothelioma
Peritoneal carcinomatosis and peritoneal mesothelioma are fundamentally different diseases: carcinomatosis represents metastatic spread of cancer from another primary site (most commonly gastrointestinal or ovarian), while peritoneal mesothelioma is a primary malignancy arising from the mesothelial cells lining the peritoneum itself. 1, 2
Origin and Etiology
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis:
- Secondary malignancy representing metastatic spread from a primary tumor elsewhere (colon, rectum, ovary, stomach, appendix) 1
- No specific environmental exposure required
- Occurs as a complication of advanced primary cancer 1
Peritoneal Mesothelioma:
- Primary malignancy of peritoneal mesothelial cells 2, 3
- Accounts for approximately 30% of all mesotheliomas (pleural being most common at 70%) 2
- Strongly associated with asbestos exposure (85% of cases), though can occur in young women without known exposure 2, 4
- Germline BAP1 mutations increase susceptibility 3
- Long latency period of 20-40 years after asbestos exposure 5
Clinical Presentation
Both conditions share overlapping symptoms:
Key distinguishing features:
Peritoneal Mesothelioma specifically presents with:
- Disproportionately small ascites relative to tumor burden (unlike carcinomatosis) 6
- Systemic symptoms including fever and night sweats 4
- Thrombocytemia and hypercoagulability 4
- Dyspeptic complaints may be initial presentation 3
Diagnostic Approach
Critical diagnostic distinction:
For Peritoneal Carcinomatosis:
- Must identify the primary tumor site through comprehensive imaging and endoscopy 1
- CT shows peritoneal nodules, omental caking, typically moderate to large ascites 1, 6
- Cytology and immunohistochemistry directed at identifying primary site (CEA, CA-19-9, CA-125 depending on suspected primary) 1
For Peritoneal Mesothelioma:
- Must exclude other primary tumors first - this is essential to diagnosis 6
- Occupational history of asbestos exposure is critical 5, 3
- CT/ultrasound shows soft-tissue masses, thickened omentum/peritoneum/mesentery, disproportionately small ascites, and may show pleural plaques 6
- Ascitic cytology with immunocytochemistry (calretinin positive, cytokeratin 5/6 positive, Claudin-4 negative, CEA negative) 7, 3
- Tissue biopsy via laparoscopy or CT-guided biopsy is mandatory for definitive diagnosis 3, 6
- Immunohistochemistry must demonstrate mesothelial phenotype and exclude adenocarcinoma 1, 7
- BAP1 loss and CDKN2A/p16 deletion support mesothelioma diagnosis 1, 3
Common pitfall: Cytology alone cannot reliably distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma - tissue biopsy with immunohistochemistry is required 7, 3
Treatment and Management
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis:
- Treatment directed at primary tumor type (colorectal, ovarian, gastric protocols) 1
- For colorectal cancer with isolated peritoneal disease: cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in highly selected patients (PCI <20, complete resection achievable, no extra-abdominal disease) 1
- This remains experimental and should only be performed in specialized centers within clinical trials 1
- For ovarian cancer: HIPEC at interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy shows proven benefit 8
- Systemic chemotherapy based on primary tumor histology 1
Peritoneal Mesothelioma:
- Standard curative approach: cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC (using cisplatin and doxorubicin) with 5-year survival rates of 29-63% 2, 9
- Surgery removes bulky tumor, leaving microscopic disease susceptible to intraperitoneal chemotherapy 2, 9
- For unresectable disease: systemic chemotherapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin (median survival 12-14 months) 2, 3
- Alternative regimen: cisplatin plus irinotecan (CPT-11) with 24% response rate and good tolerability 4
- Rationale for CPT-11: mesothelial cells contain high carboxylesterase levels, activating irinotecan to SN-38 4
Prognosis
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis:
- Prognosis depends entirely on primary tumor type and extent of disease 1
- Generally indicates advanced stage with poor prognosis under systemic chemotherapy alone 1
- Selected patients with limited disease may achieve long-term survival with CRS/HIPEC 1
Peritoneal Mesothelioma:
- Historically dismal prognosis, but dramatically improved with CRS/HIPEC over last two decades 2, 9
- Without aggressive treatment: median survival approximately 12-14 months with chemotherapy alone 2, 3
- With CRS/HIPEC: 5-year survival 29-63% in selected patients 2
- Success requires complete cytoreduction to microscopic residual disease 9
Key Imaging Distinctions
The most useful radiologic clue:
- Peritoneal mesothelioma: disproportionately small ascites relative to tumor burden 6
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis: typically moderate to large ascites 6
- Both show omental caking, peritoneal nodules, and thickened peritoneum 6
- Mesothelioma may show pleural plaques (asbestos exposure marker) 6
Management Algorithm
When encountering peritoneal disease:
- Obtain detailed occupational history (asbestos exposure suggests mesothelioma) 5, 3
- Search exhaustively for primary tumor with CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, upper and lower endoscopy, mammography in women 1, 6
- If primary tumor identified: diagnose as peritoneal carcinomatosis, treat primary tumor 1
- If no primary tumor found: obtain tissue biopsy (laparoscopy or CT-guided) with immunohistochemistry 3, 6
- Immunohistochemistry pattern:
- If mesothelioma confirmed: refer to specialized center for CRS/HIPEC evaluation 2, 9