What is the normal endometrial thickness in a female patient, considering her age and menstrual cycle status?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Normal Endometrial Thickness

Normal endometrial thickness varies dramatically based on menopausal status: in reproductive-age women it ranges from 2-4 mm during menstruation to 8-14 mm in the late luteal phase with no validated upper limit, while in postmenopausal women it should be ≤4 mm. 1

Reproductive-Age Women

Menstrual Cycle Variation

  • Endometrial thickness fluctuates throughout the menstrual cycle and must always be correlated with cycle day for accurate interpretation. 1
  • During menstruation: approximately 2-4 mm 1
  • Proliferative phase: progressively thickens
  • Late secretory/luteal phase: 8-14 mm 1
  • A measurement of 6.6 mm may be entirely normal depending on menstrual cycle phase 1, 2

Key Clinical Points

  • There is no validated absolute upper limit cutoff for endometrial thickness in premenopausal women. 1, 2
  • Timing of ultrasound assessment is critical—always correlate with the patient's menstrual cycle day 1
  • Abnormal echogenicity and texture correlate with underlying pathology regardless of thickness 1, 2

Postmenopausal Women

Normal Thickness and Thresholds

  • The endometrial lining should be ≤4 mm in postmenopausal women, which conveys a negative predictive value for endometrial cancer approaching 100%. 1, 3
  • When endometrial thickness is ≥5 mm, endometrial tissue sampling is generally recommended 1, 2, 3
  • The mean endometrial thickness in asymptomatic postmenopausal women is approximately 2.9 mm (95% CI, 2.6-3.3 mm) 4

Clinical Context

  • Endometrial thickness correlates with body weight and body mass index in postmenopausal women 5
  • In women with endometrial cancer, mean thickness is 18.2 ± 6.2 mm compared to 3.4 ± 1.2 mm in those with atrophic endometrium 6
  • The prevalence of endometrial carcinoma in asymptomatic postmenopausal women is 0.62% (95% CI, 0.42-0.82%) 4

Diagnostic Approach

Imaging Technique

  • Transvaginal ultrasound should be combined with transabdominal ultrasound for complete pelvic assessment 2, 3
  • Color and spectral Doppler should be used to evaluate internal vascularity 2
  • Ultrasound is sensitive for measuring thickness but cannot reliably determine the etiology of endometrial thickening 1, 2, 3

When to Sample

  • For postmenopausal women with endometrial thickness ≥5 mm, endometrial tissue sampling is mandatory. 2, 3
  • Pipelle or Vabra devices have sensitivities of 99.6% and 97.1% respectively for detecting endometrial carcinoma 3
  • Hysteroscopy with directed biopsy is preferred over blind sampling for focal lesions 3

Common Pitfalls

  • Do not use a single thickness cutoff for premenopausal women—always consider menstrual cycle phase. 1
  • Do not assume normal thickness excludes pathology if echogenicity or texture is abnormal 1, 2
  • In postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy, measure thickness immediately after withdrawal bleeding for most reliable assessment 7
  • Some guidelines recommend a more conservative ≤3 mm cutoff for postmenopausal women 3

References

Guideline

Endometrial Thickness Guidelines in Reproductive Age Women

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Interpreting Endometrial Thickness

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Endometrial Thickness in Postmenopausal Women

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Capacity of endometrial thickness measurement to diagnose endometrial carcinoma in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.