Is a GLP-1 (Glucagon-like peptide-1) agonist safe for an uncontrolled diabetic patient with no eye exam in the past 3 years?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 15, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

GLP-1 Agonist Safety in Uncontrolled Diabetics Without Recent Eye Exam

A GLP-1 agonist should NOT be initiated in an uncontrolled diabetic patient whose last eye exam was 3 years ago until a comprehensive dilated eye examination is performed to assess for diabetic retinopathy, particularly proliferative disease. 1

Critical Pre-Treatment Requirement

Patients must undergo appropriate, guideline-recommended eye examinations before starting GLP-1 agonist therapy if an examination has not been completed within the last 12 months. 1 This is not merely a suggestion but a specific safety recommendation from the American College of Cardiology based on the SUSTAIN-6 trial findings. 1

The 3-year gap in eye examinations is particularly concerning because:

  • Type 2 diabetics should have had an initial dilated eye examination at the time of diabetes diagnosis, with subsequent annual exams if retinopathy is present. 1
  • If no retinopathy is present and glycemic control is adequate, exams every 1-2 years may be acceptable, but 3 years exceeds this interval. 1
  • In an uncontrolled diabetic, the likelihood of having developed or progressed retinopathy during this 3-year period is substantial. 1

Why This Matters: The Retinopathy Risk

GLP-1 agonists, particularly semaglutide, have been associated with increased risk of diabetic retinopathy complications in randomized trials. 1, 2 The mechanism is critical to understand:

The retinopathy worsening is hypothesized to be related to the rapid reduction in blood glucose and A1C, not necessarily a direct drug effect. 1 This means:

  • Patients with poor baseline glycemic control (HbA1c >9%) are at higher risk. 2
  • Patients with pre-existing proliferative diabetic retinopathy are at particularly high risk. 2, 3
  • The rapid improvement in glycemia can cause initial worsening of retinopathy. 1, 3

Without knowing the current retinopathy status after 3 years, you cannot assess this risk or implement appropriate mitigation strategies.

The Clinical Algorithm

Step 1: Obtain Eye Examination FIRST

  • Schedule comprehensive dilated eye examination by ophthalmologist or optometrist before prescribing any GLP-1 agonist. 1
  • Document the retinopathy status: none, non-proliferative (mild, moderate, severe), or proliferative. 1
  • Assess for diabetic macular edema. 1

Step 2: Risk Stratification Based on Eye Exam Results

If NO retinopathy or only mild non-proliferative retinopathy:

  • GLP-1 agonist can be initiated with standard precautions. 2
  • Start at lowest dose and titrate slowly to minimize rapid A1C reduction. 2
  • Plan for annual eye exams going forward. 1

If moderate to severe non-proliferative retinopathy:

  • GLP-1 agonist can be used but requires enhanced monitoring. 2
  • Reduce concurrent insulin dose by 20% when starting GLP-1 agonist to slow glycemic improvement. 2
  • If on sulfonylureas with well-controlled baseline HbA1c, reduce sulfonylurea dose by 50%. 2
  • Consider more frequent ophthalmologic monitoring (every 6 months rather than annually). 2
  • Avoid aggressive A1C reduction targets initially. 2

If proliferative diabetic retinopathy:

  • Exercise extreme caution; consider alternative agents first (SGLT2 inhibitors for cardiovascular risk reduction). 2, 3
  • If GLP-1 agonist is still deemed necessary, ensure ophthalmology is actively managing the proliferative disease. 2
  • Implement all mitigation strategies: slow titration, insulin/sulfonylurea dose reduction, frequent monitoring. 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Pitfall #1: Assuming the patient has no retinopathy because they have no visual symptoms. Diabetic retinopathy is often asymptomatic until advanced stages. 1 The 3-year gap means you have no current data.

Pitfall #2: Prioritizing the cardiovascular benefits without addressing retinopathy risk. While GLP-1 agonists reduce cardiovascular events by 13% 2, this benefit must be weighed against potential vision-threatening complications in high-risk patients. The eye exam allows you to make this risk-benefit assessment properly.

Pitfall #3: Initiating therapy with plans to "get the eye exam soon." The retinopathy complications can occur with rapid A1C reduction, which begins immediately upon starting therapy. 1 The eye exam must precede initiation.

Pitfall #4: Believing all GLP-1 agonists carry equal retinopathy risk. While liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide have all been associated with retinopathy worsening 1, 3, semaglutide showed the most pronounced signal in SUSTAIN-6. 1 However, the mechanism appears related to rapidity of glycemic improvement rather than drug-specific effects. 2, 3

Nuance in the Evidence

There is conflicting evidence on GLP-1 agonist retinopathy risk:

  • Some real-world studies show GLP-1 agonists may actually be protective against diabetic retinopathy when accounting for longitudinal glycemic control. 4
  • A 2024 study found no increased risk of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy with GLP-1 agonists compared to other oral agents in patients with non-proliferative retinopathy. 5
  • However, the FDA drug label for semaglutide specifically warns about diabetic retinopathy complications and recommends monitoring patients with a history of diabetic retinopathy. 6

The key distinction: The protective effects seen in some studies likely reflect better long-term glycemic control. The risk occurs specifically with rapid A1C reduction in patients with pre-existing retinopathy, particularly proliferative disease. 1, 2, 7 This is why knowing the baseline retinopathy status is essential.

Documentation Requirements

Document in the medical record:

  • Pre-treatment ophthalmologic assessment results. 2
  • Informed consent discussion about retinopathy risks, particularly if pre-existing retinopathy is present. 2
  • Mitigation strategies implemented (dose titration plan, insulin/sulfonylurea adjustments). 2
  • Follow-up ophthalmology monitoring plan. 2

Bottom Line

Do not prescribe a GLP-1 agonist to this patient until a current eye examination is obtained. 1 The 3-year gap in eye care combined with uncontrolled diabetes creates an unacceptable knowledge gap about retinopathy status, which directly impacts both the safety of initiating GLP-1 agonist therapy and the necessary risk mitigation strategies. Schedule the eye exam first, then proceed based on the findings using the algorithm above.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Semaglutide and Optic Nerve Risk

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Diabetic Retinopathy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.