Sutures Are Superior to Tissue Adhesives for Wound Closure
Sutures should be your first-line method for wound closure in nearly all clinical scenarios, as tissue adhesives carry an unacceptably high risk of wound breakdown with a 3.35-fold increased risk of dehiscence compared to sutures. 1, 2
The Evidence Against Tissue Adhesives
The data is clear and concerning:
- Tissue adhesives result in wound breakdown 3.35 times more frequently than sutures (95% CI 1.53-7.33), meaning you would need to treat 43 patients with sutures instead of glue to prevent one additional dehiscence 1, 2
- This finding comes from a Cochrane systematic review of 10 trials with 736 participants, representing the highest quality evidence available 2
- The American College of Surgeons explicitly recommends sutures as first-line for most wound closures, particularly when wound integrity and mechanical support are critical 1
When Sutures Are Mandatory
Certain clinical situations absolutely require sutures:
- High-tension wounds - Tissue adhesives fail catastrophically in areas where mechanical forces are significant, such as joints, areas of movement, or wounds under tension 1
- Contaminated or infection-prone wounds - Use triclosan-coated antimicrobial sutures, which reduce surgical site infection risk (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.88) 1
- Deep tissue closure - Adhesives cannot provide the structural support needed for fascial or deep tissue layers 1
Optimal Suture Technique for Best Outcomes
When using sutures (which should be nearly always), follow this evidence-based approach:
For Skin Closure:
- Use continuous subcuticular sutures with slowly absorbable monofilament material (4-0 poliglecaprone or polyglactin) 1
- This technique reduces superficial wound dehiscence by 92% (RR 0.08; 95% CI 0.02-0.35) compared to interrupted sutures 1
- The dramatic reduction occurs because absorbable material provides prolonged support without requiring removal at 7-9 days 1
For Fascial/Deep Closure:
- Maintain a suture-to-wound length ratio of at least 4:1 to minimize incisional hernia and wound complications 1
- Use the "small bite" technique: place stitches 5mm from the wound edge and 5mm between stitches, including only the aponeurosis 1
- Choose slowly absorbable monofilament sutures that retain 50-75% tensile strength after 1 week 1
For High-Risk Scenarios:
- Use triclosan-coated sutures for contaminated wounds or abdominal/colorectal surgery (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.46-0.98 for SSI reduction) 1, 3
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never use tissue adhesives alone in emergency laparotomy or abdominal wall closures - these require proper suture technique 1
- Never use rapidly absorbable sutures for fascial closure - they increase incisional hernia rates compared to slowly absorbable materials 1, 3
- Don't remove non-absorbable sutures before 7-9 days for most surgical wounds, as premature removal causes dehiscence 1
- Avoid pulling continuous sutures too tightly - this strangulates wound edges and causes ischemia 1
The Limited Role of Tissue Adhesives
While tissue adhesives may have a role as adjuncts in very specific, low-tension scenarios, the evidence does not support their use as a primary closure method:
- No evidence shows tissue adhesives reduce infection rates compared to sutures 2
- Patient and operator satisfaction show no significant differences 2
- The only potential advantage is slightly faster application time, which is clinically insignificant given the dehiscence risk 2
Clinical Algorithm
For any surgical wound closure:
- Default to sutures unless you have a compelling reason not to 1
- Assess wound tension - if any tension exists, sutures are mandatory 1
- Assess contamination risk - if contaminated/dirty, use triclosan-coated sutures 1, 3
- Choose technique:
- Monitor for dehiscence in first 7-10 days regardless of method chosen 1