Mammography for Women with Breast Implants
Women with breast implants should undergo standard mammography (or digital breast tomosynthesis) using BOTH standard compression views AND implant-displaced (Eklund) views to maximize breast tissue visualization, following the same screening schedule as women without implants. 1
Screening Protocol by Age
The American College of Radiology recommends that patients with breast implants follow identical breast cancer screening protocols as those without implants, with critical technical modifications 1:
For Women Age 40 and Older
- Mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is the first-line screening modality 2, 1
- Both standard craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views PLUS implant-displaced views must be obtained at every screening 1
- This dual-view approach is non-negotiable for adequate breast tissue evaluation 1
For Women Age 30-39
- Mammography or DBT is appropriate for screening 2
- Same dual-view technique (standard + implant-displaced) applies 1
For Women Under Age 30
- Screening mammography is generally not indicated unless there are specific risk factors 2
Critical Technical Requirements
The implant-displaced (Eklund) technique is essential and must be performed in addition to standard views 1, 3:
- Standard compression views alone result in 25-44% decrease in visualized breast tissue depending on implant position 4
- Implant-displaced views push the implant back against the chest wall while pulling breast tissue forward 3, 5
- Anterior breast tissue is better visualized with displacement views, while posterior tissue is better seen with standard compression 4
What Mammography Can and Cannot Detect
Mammography in women with implants can detect breast cancer in visualized tissue and extracapsular silicone rupture, but cannot reliably detect intracapsular implant rupture 1, 6:
- Sensitivity for detecting breast abnormalities: 73% 2
- Extracapsular silicone appears as high-density material outside the implant shell 6
- Intracapsular rupture (the majority of implant ruptures) requires MRI for diagnosis 1, 6
Important Clinical Caveats
Always compare with prior mammograms, especially in patients with previous silicone implants 1:
- Residual silicone from previously removed implants can mimic new extracapsular rupture 1
- Capsular calcifications correlate with implant age but do not indicate rupture 6
Image quality is inherently compromised by implants 4, 7:
- Subglandular implants reduce measurable tissue area by 44% with compression and 36% with displacement technique 4
- Submuscular implants reduce measurable tissue area by 25% with compression and 15% with displacement technique 4
- Despite these limitations, screening remains essential and follows the same schedule 1
Implant Evaluation vs. Cancer Screening
For asymptomatic women with breast implants, no additional imaging is recommended specifically for implant evaluation 2, 1:
- Mammography is performed for cancer screening, not routine implant surveillance 1
- Saline implant rupture is clinically evident (breast size/shape change) and does not require imaging surveillance 2, 1
- Silicone implant integrity monitoring requires MRI or ultrasound starting at 5-6 years post-surgery, then every 2-3 years, but this is separate from cancer screening 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never perform mammography without implant-displaced views - this results in inadequate breast tissue visualization 1, 4
- Do not skip screening because of implants - cancer screening protocols remain unchanged 1
- Do not rely on mammography alone to evaluate suspected implant rupture - MRI without contrast is required for silicone implant integrity assessment 6, 8