Minimum Age for Refractive Surgery
The minimum age for refractive surgery is 18 years, though the procedure can be performed in carefully selected adolescents as young as the mid-teens when refractive stability has been documented and the benefits clearly outweigh the risks. 1
Age-Based Recommendations
Standard Minimum Age
- Refractive surgery should generally be deferred until at least 18 years of age when refractive error has stabilized 1
- The American Academy of Ophthalmology guidelines reference refractive surgery as an option for correcting symptomatic refractive errors in adults, with comprehensive eye examinations recommended every 5-10 years for patients under 40 years old 1
- Over 8.5 million Americans have undergone keratorefractive surgery since 1995, with the vast majority being adults 1
Adolescent Considerations
- Adolescents can achieve comparable or even slightly better safety and efficacy outcomes compared to young adults aged 20-40 years 2
- In a large cohort study, adolescents under 18 years demonstrated better safety and efficacy indices with lower retreatment rates (1% versus 2.7%) compared to the 20-40 age group 2
- However, adolescent refractive surgery should only be considered when:
Critical Stability Requirements
Refractive Stability Assessment
- Myopia progression is common in children and adolescents, with prevalence of 9% in children aged 5-17 years in the United States 1
- Younger patients with keratoconus demonstrate faster disease progression, making early detection crucial but also necessitating caution with any corneal surgery 1
- Natural progression of corneal steepening decelerates after age 30, but progression can still occur in older patients with high baseline keratometry values 1
Documentation Requirements
- At least 12 months of stable refraction should be documented before proceeding with surgery in younger patients 2
- Serial refractions should demonstrate changes of less than 0.50 D over the observation period 2
- Corneal topography following contact lens abstinence is essential to rule out irregular astigmatism or ectasia risk 1
Special Populations and Exceptions
Accommodative Esotropia
- Refractive surgery for accommodative esotropia may be considered in adults with corrected esodeviation ≤10 prism diopters 3
- There is insufficient evidence to recommend refractive surgery for patients under 18 years with accommodative esotropia, despite case reports describing procedures in children as young as 7 years 3
- The safety and predictability remain unclear for pediatric patients, and long-term follow-up data are lacking 3
Older Adults
- Patients over 60 years can safely undergo refractive surgery, though they demonstrate lower efficacy indices and higher retreatment rates compared to younger adults 2
- For hyperopic treatments in patients >60 years: safety index 0.95 versus 0.99 in young adults, with retreatment rates of 6.2% versus 2.5% 2
- For myopic treatments in patients >60 years: efficacy index 0.88 versus 0.97 in young adults, with retreatment rates of 11% versus 1.1% 2
Preoperative Screening Essentials
Mandatory Evaluations
- Comprehensive corneal topography and tomography to exclude keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, or other ectatic disorders 1
- Evaluation of posterior corneal surface abnormalities, as these may predict unpredictable outcomes and post-surgical ectasia progression 1
- Assessment of higher-order aberrations, particularly vertical coma, which is elevated in keratoconus 1
- Cycloplegic refraction to ensure accurate measurement of refractive error, especially in younger patients with active accommodation 1
Risk Factor Assessment
- Patients should refrain from eye rubbing, which is associated with keratoconus progression 1
- Consider mast cell stabilizers for patients with ocular allergies to reduce eye rubbing behavior 1
- Closer follow-up is recommended for patients younger than 17 years and those with corneal steepening >55 D 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not perform refractive surgery on patients with unstable refraction, regardless of age, as this leads to suboptimal outcomes and higher retreatment rates 2
- Do not skip corneal tomography in the preoperative evaluation, as topography alone may miss posterior corneal abnormalities suggestive of ectasia risk 1
- Do not assume that excellent visual acuity excludes serious eye disease—comprehensive evaluation is mandatory 1
- Avoid surgery in patients with evidence of progressive keratoconus until corneal cross-linking has been performed and stability documented 1
- Be cautious with IOL prediction accuracy in younger patients, as prediction error exceeds 2.00 diopters in 15% of pediatric cases 4