What is the recommended management plan for patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events, considering the latest Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (CVOT) on dapagliflozin (DAPA)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 17, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Latest Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial on Dapagliflozin

DECLARE-TIMI 58: The Definitive CVOT for Dapagliflozin

The DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial (2018) is the largest and most recent cardiovascular outcomes trial for dapagliflozin, demonstrating a 17% reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.83,95% CI 0.73-0.95), driven primarily by a 27% reduction in heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.73,95% CI 0.61-0.88). 1

Trial Design and Population

  • DECLARE-TIMI 58 randomized 17,160 patients with type 2 diabetes to dapagliflozin 10 mg daily versus placebo, with a median follow-up of 4.2 years 1
  • The trial uniquely enrolled a broader population than other SGLT2 inhibitor CVOTs: 40.6% had established cardiovascular disease while 59.4% had multiple risk factors only (age ≥55 years in men or ≥60 years in women plus at least one additional CV risk factor) 1
  • Mean baseline characteristics: HbA1c 8.3%, eGFR 85.2 mL/min/1.73 m², 10% with history of heart failure 1

Primary Cardiovascular Outcomes

Dapagliflozin demonstrated cardiovascular non-inferiority for MACE (cardiovascular death, MI, or ischemic stroke) with HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.84-1.03), meeting the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 1.3. 1

  • The incidence of MACE was 2.30 events per 100 patient-years with dapagliflozin versus 2.46 with placebo 1
  • Dapagliflozin was superior to placebo for the co-primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization: HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.95, p=0.0035) 1
  • The benefit was driven by a 27% reduction in heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.73,95% CI 0.61-0.88) with no significant change in cardiovascular death alone 1

Subgroup Analysis: Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction

In the 3,584 patients with previous MI, dapagliflozin reduced MACE by 16% (HR 0.84,95% CI 0.72-0.99, p=0.039) with an absolute risk reduction of 2.6%, whereas there was no MACE benefit in patients without prior MI (HR 1.00,95% CI 0.88-1.13). 2

  • The benefit appeared greatest within 2 years after the last acute MI event (p for interaction trend=0.007) 2
  • For cardiovascular death/heart failure hospitalization, absolute risk reductions were 1.9% in patients with prior MI versus 0.6% in those without 2

Renal Outcomes

  • Dapagliflozin significantly reduced the composite renal endpoint of sustained ≥40% decline in eGFR, end-stage kidney disease, or renal/cardiovascular death by 24% (HR 0.76,95% CI 0.67-0.87) 1
  • At baseline, 23.5% had microalbuminuria and 6.8% had macroalbuminuria 1

Subsequent Heart Failure Trials

DAPA-HF Trial (2019)

The DAPA-HF trial enrolled 4,744 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤40%), demonstrating a 26% reduction in cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (HR 0.74,95% CI 0.65-0.85) over 18 months, with benefits independent of diabetes status. 1, 3

  • 55% of patients did not have diabetes, establishing dapagliflozin as the first SGLT2 inhibitor proven effective in heart failure regardless of diabetes 3
  • Hospitalization for heart failure was reduced by 30% (HR 0.70,95% CI 0.59-0.83) 1
  • The treatment effect curves separated early and continued to diverge throughout the trial 1

DELIVER Trial (2022)

  • DELIVER enrolled 6,263 patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (LVEF >40%), showing an 18% reduction in cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, or urgent heart failure visits (HR 0.82,95% CI 0.73-0.92) over 28 months 1
  • This established dapagliflozin's efficacy across the entire spectrum of heart failure phenotypes 1

DAPA-CKD Trial (2020): Renal Protection

The DAPA-CKD trial demonstrated that dapagliflozin reduced the primary composite renal endpoint (≥50% sustained eGFR decline, ESKD, or renal/cardiovascular death) by 39% (HR 0.61,95% CI 0.51-0.72) in patients with CKD and albuminuria, regardless of diabetes status. 1, 4

  • The trial enrolled patients with eGFR 25-75 mL/min/1.73 m² and UACR 200-5000 mg/g 4
  • 67.5% had diabetes and 32.5% did not, with consistent benefits in both groups 5
  • The kidney-specific composite was reduced by 44% (HR 0.56,95% CI 0.45-0.68) 1
  • Cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization was reduced by 29% (HR 0.71,95% CI 0.55-0.92) 1

Clinical Implications from Guidelines

Current ESC and ADA guidelines recommend dapagliflozin (along with empagliflozin and canagliflozin) in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease or very high/high cardiovascular risk to reduce cardiovascular events, independent of glycemic control needs. 6

  • The 2019 ESC Guidelines give a Class I, Level A recommendation for SGLT2 inhibitors including dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes and CVD or at very high/high CV risk 6
  • Dapagliflozin is recommended at a fixed dose of 10 mg once daily for cardiovascular and renal protection, regardless of eGFR level (as long as ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m²) 4
  • For glycemic control, dapagliflozin should not be initiated if eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m², but cardiovascular and renal benefits persist at lower eGFR levels 4

Key Safety Considerations from CVOTs

  • Genital mycotic infections occurred in approximately 6% of patients versus 1% on placebo 4
  • Dapagliflozin should be withheld at least 3 days before major surgery or procedures requiring prolonged fasting to prevent postoperative ketoacidosis 4
  • Volume depletion risk is higher in elderly patients and those on concurrent diuretics, requiring assessment before initiation 4
  • An initial reversible eGFR dip of 3-5 mL/min/1.73 m² typically occurs within 1-4 weeks, followed by long-term renal protection 4

References

Guideline

Dapagliflozin Dosing and Safety Considerations

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Dapagliflozin Therapy for Cardiovascular and Renal Benefits

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

What is the recommended use and dosage of Dapagliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitor) for patients with type 2 diabetes or heart failure?
What are the indications and usage of Farxiga (dapagliflozin) in patients with type 2 diabetes?
What is the indication and dosage for Dapagliflozin (Forxiga) in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure?
What is the use of Dapagliflozin (Forxiga)?
What is the role of SGLT2 (Sodium-Glucose Linked Transporter 2) inhibitors in treating patients with type 2 diabetes?
Is Resmetirom (a selective thyroid hormone receptor beta agonist) an appropriate first-line treatment for an adult patient with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), possibly with metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, or type 2 diabetes?
What's the best course of action for a patient with unilateral tonsillitis, presenting with a significantly red and pus-covered right tonsil, grey in color, and bad breath, who has been taking clindamycin (clindamycin) 300mg orally three times a day for over 12 hours?
What are the recommended dressings and treatments for patients with pressure ulcers?
How does low albumin level affect the dosing of ertapenem in an adult patient with a urinary tract infection and impaired renal function?
What are the differential diagnoses for a juvenile patient presenting with arthritis symptoms in a location with a high incidence of Lyme disease?
What is the best course of action for a patient with unilateral tonsillitis and a grey, pus-covered tonsil, currently being treated with clindamycin?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.