Screening Questionnaires for Bipolar II Disorder
While several screening questionnaires exist for bipolar spectrum disorders, none are specifically validated or recommended for diagnosing bipolar II disorder in routine clinical practice, and their use should be limited to raising clinical suspicion rather than establishing diagnosis.
Available Screening Instruments
Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ)
- The MDQ is a self-report screening tool designed to detect bipolar spectrum disorders, but it has significant limitations for bipolar II disorder specifically 1, 2, 3
- The original MDQ scoring (7+ symptoms plus functional impairment) shows sensitivity of only 0.67 for bipolar II disorder compared to 0.83 for bipolar I 2
- Dropping the supplementary questions and using a cutoff of 9+ symptoms improves bipolar II sensitivity to 0.88 with specificity of 0.90 2
- In psychiatric outpatient settings, the MDQ at standard cutoffs has poor positive predictive value (22.1%), meaning most patients screening positive do not actually have bipolar disorder 4
Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32)
- The HCL-32 demonstrates superior accuracy for detecting bipolar II disorder compared to the MDQ in mental health settings (P=0.018) 5
- Summary sensitivity is 81% with specificity of 67% at recommended cutoffs in psychiatric services 5
- The HCL-32 is specifically designed to capture hypomanic symptoms, making it more suitable for bipolar II screening than the MDQ 1, 5
Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS)
- The BSDS shows sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 86% at recommended cutoffs in psychiatric settings 5
- Performance characteristics fall between the HCL-32 and MDQ 5
Critical Limitations and Pitfalls
Why Screening Scales Are Insufficient
- Low positive predictive value means most positive screens are false positives, particularly problematic given that misdiagnosis leads to inappropriate treatment with mood stabilizers and antipsychotics 4
- The MDQ has relatively low sensitivity for bipolar II disorder at standard cutoffs, missing approximately one-third of cases 1, 2
- Most validation studies were conducted in specialized psychiatric settings, limiting generalizability to primary care 5
Diagnostic Approach Instead
- Formal diagnosis requires structured clinical interview using DSM criteria, not questionnaire scores alone 3, 5
- Assessment must include detailed history of hypomanic episodes, which are often not recognized by patients as pathological 1
- Evaluate for history of antidepressant-induced mood elevation or switching, family history of bipolar disorder, and early age of depression onset 1
Practical Clinical Algorithm
For patients with suspected bipolar II disorder:
Use the HCL-32 as initial screening tool if you choose to screen, as it has the best sensitivity for bipolar II 5
If HCL-32 is positive or clinical suspicion remains high, conduct comprehensive diagnostic assessment including:
- Detailed history of discrete hypomanic episodes (elevated mood, increased energy, decreased need for sleep lasting ≥4 days) 6
- Pattern of mood episodes over time, including response to antidepressants 1
- Family psychiatric history, particularly bipolar disorder in first-degree relatives 6
- Assessment of functional impairment during mood episodes 3
Refer to psychiatry for definitive diagnosis rather than relying on screening scores alone 4
Rule out medical causes including thyroid dysfunction, substance use, and medication effects before attributing symptoms to bipolar disorder 7
Bottom Line
No screening questionnaire is adequate for diagnosing bipolar II disorder in clinical practice 4. If you must screen, the HCL-32 outperforms the MDQ for detecting bipolar II 5, but positive screens require formal psychiatric evaluation with structured diagnostic interview to confirm diagnosis before initiating treatment with mood stabilizers or antipsychotics 3, 4.