What is the Breast Destiny 03 trial for breast cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

DESTINY-Breast03 Trial Overview

DESTINY-Breast03 was a pivotal phase 3 randomized trial that established trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) as superior to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. 1, 2

Trial Design and Patient Population

  • This open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial enrolled 524 patients across 169 study centers in North America, Asia, Europe, Australia, and South America between July 2018 and June 2020 2
  • Eligible patients were aged 18 or older with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer, ECOG performance status 0-1, and at least one measurable lesion 2
  • All patients had received previous treatment with trastuzumab and a taxane 2
  • Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg (n=261) or T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg (n=263), both administered intravenously every 3 weeks 2
  • Randomization was stratified by hormone receptor status, previous pertuzumab treatment, and history of visceral disease 2

Primary Efficacy Results

The trial demonstrated dramatic superiority of T-DXd over T-DM1 in progression-free survival, with a 67% reduction in risk of disease progression or death. 2

  • Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 28.8 months (95% CI 22.4-37.9) with T-DXd versus 6.8 months (95% CI 5.6-8.2) with T-DM1 2
  • Hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0.33 (95% CI 0.26-0.43; p<0.0001), representing the longest reported median progression-free survival in this setting 1, 2
  • This represents a clinically meaningful improvement of over 22 months in median progression-free survival 2

Overall Survival Results

At the second interim analysis with median follow-up of 28.4 months, T-DXd demonstrated a significant 36% reduction in risk of death compared to T-DM1. 2

  • Median overall survival was not reached in either arm at this analysis 2
  • The T-DXd group had 72 (28%) overall survival events versus 97 (37%) events in the T-DM1 group 2
  • Hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.64 (95% CI 0.47-0.87; p=0.0037), meeting the prespecified significance threshold 2
  • These results established T-DXd as the new standard of care in the second-line setting for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer 2

Safety Profile

Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events occurred at similar rates between arms (56% with T-DXd versus 52% with T-DM1), but interstitial lung disease was more common with T-DXd. 2

  • Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were higher with T-DXd (relative risk 1.38,95% CI 1.14-1.66) 1
  • Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in 39 (15%) patients treated with T-DXd versus 8 (3%) patients treated with T-DM1 2
  • Critically, no grade 4 or 5 interstitial lung disease events occurred in either arm, representing improved safety compared to earlier trials 1, 2
  • The lower rate of severe interstitial lung disease compared to the more heavily pretreated DESTINY-Breast01 population suggests earlier use may be safer 1

Patient-Reported Outcomes

Quality of life was maintained throughout treatment with T-DXd despite longer treatment duration, and time to deterioration numerically favored T-DXd over T-DM1. 3

  • Baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status scores were similar between arms, with no clinically meaningful change (<10-point change) while on either treatment 3
  • Median treatment duration was 14.3 months with T-DXd versus 6.9 months with T-DM1 3
  • Time to definitive deterioration hazard ratios numerically favored T-DXd over T-DM1 for all prespecified patient-reported outcome variables, including pain 3
  • Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis showed T-DXd produced a substantial improvement of 3.80 months (95% CI 1.91-5.62; p<0.001) compared to T-DM1, representing an 11.64% relative gain 4

Hospitalization Data

  • Only 6.9% of patients receiving T-DXd versus 7.2% receiving T-DM1 were hospitalized during the study 3
  • Median time to first hospitalization was 219.5 days with T-DXd versus 60.0 days with T-DM1—three times longer with T-DXd 3

Clinical Practice Implications

Based on DESTINY-Breast03 results, ASCO guidelines now recommend T-DXd as the preferred second-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer after progression on trastuzumab and a taxane. 1

  • T-DXd has replaced T-DM1 as the standard second-line treatment in this setting 1, 2
  • The trial results led to regulatory approval and guideline updates establishing T-DXd as the preferred option 1
  • Clinicians must maintain active surveillance for interstitial lung disease, which requires specific management protocols, though severe cases (grade 3-5) remain uncommon at 15% overall incidence with no grade 4-5 events 1, 2
  • The optimal sequencing after T-DXd progression remains an area of ongoing investigation, as patients in DESTINY-Breast03 had not received prior T-DXd 1

Related Questions

What is the preferred treatment option between Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan) and TDM1 (Trastuzumab emtansine) for a patient with HER2-positive (Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2-positive) breast cancer?
What is the role of the Destiny Breast 05 trial in treating a patient with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who has previously received trastuzumab (Herceptin) and a taxane?
How are Enhertu (trastuzumab deruxtecan) associated infections managed?
What is the recommended dose of Enhertu (trastuzumab deruxtecan) for a patient weighing 57 kg?
What is the chemotherapy regimen with Trastuzumab deruxtecan (Inhertu)?
What is HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) typing in the context of a patient with severe leukopenia, bone marrow failure, and severe thrombocytopenia?
What is the difference between Budecort (budesonide) and Foracort (formoterol and budesonide) for a patient with asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)?
When to use bridge anticoagulant therapy in patients with high thromboembolic risk, such as mechanical heart valves, atrial fibrillation, or venous thromboembolism, requiring temporary interruption of oral anticoagulants?
Is budesonide (inhaled corticosteroid) faster acting than Foracort (formoterol (long-acting beta-agonist) and budesonide (inhaled corticosteroid)) in a patient with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)?
What are the management recommendations for a patient with suspected or confirmed dengue fever?
What are the general recommendations and precautions for a patient considering cosmetic surgery?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.