What does the Holdaway ratio demonstrate in facial aesthetics and orthodontic treatment planning?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 18, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Holdaway Ratio in Facial Aesthetics and Orthodontic Treatment Planning

Primary Function

The Holdaway ratio (also called the H-line or Holdaway line) is a soft tissue cephalometric analysis tool that evaluates the anteroposterior relationship of the lips and chin to assess facial profile balance and guide orthodontic treatment planning, particularly in extraction versus non-extraction decisions. 1, 2

Key Measurements and Components

The Holdaway analysis uses the H-line, which is drawn from soft tissue pogonion (Pg') to the upper lip, and evaluates several critical soft tissue parameters 1, 2:

  • H angle: Measures the angle formed by the H-line and the soft tissue nasion-pogonion line, with changes indicating overall profile convexity 1
  • Upper lip to H-line: Distance from the upper lip to the H-line, typically decreasing with extraction treatment 1
  • Inferior sulcus to H-line: Depth of the lower lip sulcus relative to the H-line, which helps assess lower lip position 1, 2
  • Upper lip strain: Evaluates tension in the upper lip, which can increase undesirably with excessive retraction 1
  • Nose prominence: Relative projection of the nose in the facial profile 1

Clinical Application in Treatment Planning

The Holdaway ratio is most valuable for predicting soft tissue profile changes following four premolar extraction orthodontic treatment. 1, 2

Predictive Changes with Extraction Treatment

Studies demonstrate the following average changes after four premolar extraction 1, 2:

  • Upper and lower lips retract approximately 3.4 mm and 3.8 mm to the E-line respectively 2
  • Upper lip to H-line distance decreases during treatment 1
  • Inferior sulcus to H-line measurement increases (becomes deeper) 1
  • H angle increases, indicating profile flattening 1

Critical Treatment Contraindications

Extraction of premolars should be avoided when pretreatment cephalometric analysis shows any of the following characteristics, as these predict unesthetic profile flattening 2:

  • Nasolabial angle ≥ 110 degrees
  • Upper lip to Sn-Pg' line ≤ 3 mm
  • Lower lip to Sn-Pg' line ≤ 2 mm
  • Superior sulcus to H-line ≤ 3 mm
  • Lower lip to H-line ≤ 0 mm

Population-Specific Considerations

Holdaway norms were developed on Caucasian populations and require adjustment for different ethnic groups. 1, 3

  • Anatolian Turkish adults show statistically significant differences in seven Holdaway variables compared to original norms 1
  • Japanese and other Oriental populations demonstrate longer upper lips and shorter chin lengths compared to Caucasian standards, requiring modified aesthetic targets 3
  • Clinicians must establish population-specific norms rather than applying original Holdaway values universally 1, 3

Common Pitfalls and Limitations

The most significant risk is over-retraction of the lips, leading to an unesthetic flattened profile, particularly when treating patients who already have relatively retrusive lip positions pretreatment. 1, 2

  • Only 12% of patients in extraction studies finished with clearly flattened profiles when proper case selection was used 2
  • Upper lip strain can change in an undesirable direction during extraction treatment despite other measurements improving 1
  • Individual variability is substantial—nasolabial angle changes ranged widely in treatment studies, emphasizing the need for individualized assessment 2
  • The Holdaway analysis focuses on sagittal (anteroposterior) relationships and does not adequately assess vertical facial proportions, which are equally important for facial aesthetics 4, 5

Integration with Modern Treatment Planning

While the Holdaway ratio remains clinically useful, modern orthodontic planning incorporates additional considerations 5:

  • True vertical subnasal line measurements are decisive for lower third facial aesthetics and should be used alongside Holdaway analysis 5
  • Sagittal measurements of point B' and Pg' show significant changes pre- versus post-surgery in orthognathic cases 5
  • The lower face is proportionally divided with the chin occupying the largest portion and lower lip height the smallest in both genders 4

References

Research

Golden proportion for maxillofacial surgery in Orientals.

Annals of plastic surgery, 1989

Research

Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 2010

Research

True vertical validation in facial orthognathic surgery planning.

Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.