Management of Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block
Immediate Distinction: Mobitz Type I vs. Type II
The critical first step is distinguishing Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach) from Mobitz Type II, as this fundamentally determines management—Mobitz Type II requires permanent pacemaker implantation regardless of symptoms, while Mobitz Type I typically does not unless symptomatic or infranodal. 1
Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach) Characteristics:
- Progressive PR interval prolongation before a blocked P wave, with PR shortening after the blocked beat 2, 1
- Usually occurs at the AV node level, especially with narrow QRS 2
- Can be present in healthy, well-trained endurance athletes and during sleep 1
- Generally benign course in patients without organic heart disease 3
Mobitz Type II Characteristics:
- Constant PR intervals before and after blocked P waves without progressive prolongation 2, 1
- Almost always infranodal (His-Purkinje system), particularly with wide QRS 2, 4
- Always considered abnormal and requires evaluation regardless of symptoms 1
- High risk of progression to complete heart block 2, 4
Critical Diagnostic Pitfall:
2:1 AV block cannot be classified as Type I or Type II based on ECG alone—stress testing or electrophysiology studies are needed to distinguish 2:1 Wenckebach physiology from true Mobitz Type II. 1, 4 The coexistence of obvious Type I patterns elsewhere in the same recording (e.g., Holter) effectively rules out Type II block. 4
Management Algorithm for Mobitz Type II
Permanent pacemaker implantation is indicated for ALL patients with acquired Mobitz Type II second-degree AV block not attributable to reversible causes, regardless of symptoms. 2, 1
Class I Indications (Must Implant):
- Any Mobitz Type II block with symptomatic bradycardia 2
- Mobitz Type II block even when asymptomatic, as progression to complete heart block is common and sudden 2, 1
- Patients with neuromuscular diseases (myotonic dystrophy, Kearns-Sayre syndrome, Erb dystrophy) with any second-degree AV block 2, 1
Rationale:
Type II block indicates diffuse conduction system disease with compromised prognosis and frequent symptoms. 2 Progression to third-degree AV block is common and sudden, making prophylactic pacing essential even in asymptomatic patients. 2
Management Algorithm for Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach)
Symptomatic Patients:
Permanent pacing is indicated when symptoms (dizziness, lightheadedness, shortness of breath, syncope) are clearly attributable to the AV block. 2, 1
Asymptomatic Patients—Risk Stratification Required:
High-Risk Features Requiring Pacemaker:
- Wide QRS complex: Electrophysiological study is required to determine block level; if intra- or infra-Hisian, pacing is indicated 2
- Coexisting bundle branch block: Increases risk of progression to higher-degree block 1
- Shortest PR interval ≥300 ms: Warrants 24-hour ECG monitoring and consideration for pacing 1
- Diurnal occurrence: Some evidence suggests pacemaker implantation improves survival in elderly patients with daytime Type I block, even without symptoms 2
Low-Risk Features (Observation Acceptable):
- Narrow QRS complex with normal PR intervals (indicates AV nodal block) 2
- Nocturnal occurrence in young, healthy individuals or athletes 2, 1
- No organic heart disease 3
Special Diagnostic Considerations:
- Exercise-induced AV block: If not secondary to myocardial ischemia, indicates His-Purkinje disease with poor prognosis—pacing is indicated 2
- Exertional symptoms with resting Type I block: Exercise treadmill testing is reasonable to determine potential benefit from permanent pacing 1
Evaluation Protocol
Initial Assessment:
- ECG analysis: QRS width, PR interval pattern, presence of bundle branch block 2, 1
- Echocardiogram: Assess for structural heart disease 1
- History: Age, underlying cardiac disease, medication review (AV nodal blocking agents), symptoms correlation 2, 1
When Electrophysiological Study is Indicated (Class I):
- Symptomatic patients (syncope/near-syncope) where His-Purkinje block is suspected but not established on ECG 2
- Type I block with wide QRS to determine if block is infranodal 2
- Unclear 2:1 AV block to distinguish nodal from infranodal block 1
When Electrophysiological Study is NOT Needed (Class III):
- Symptoms and presence of AV block are already correlated by electrocardiography 2
- Asymptomatic patients with transient AV block associated with sinus slowing (e.g., nocturnal Type I block) 2
Special Clinical Contexts
Acute Myocardial Infarction:
- Inferior MI with Type I block: Usually AV nodal, often benign; atropine may be used for symptomatic bradycardia 2
- Type II block or new bifascicular block in MI: High risk—temporary pacing indicated, followed by permanent pacing if block persists 2
- Mobitz Type II has NOT been reported in inferior MI—apparent Type II patterns in this setting are likely misdiagnosed Type I 4
Perioperative Management:
Prophylactic temporary pacemaker should be implanted preoperatively in patients with 2:1 AV block even without symptoms, as progression to complete heart block can occur with anesthesia induction. 5 This case report demonstrates conversion from asymptomatic 2:1 block to complete heart block immediately following general anesthesia induction. 5
Reversible Causes to Exclude:
- Drug toxicity (beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, amiodarone) 6
- Hyperkalemia 7
- Sleep apnea (nocturnal block without symptoms does not require pacing) 2
- Vagally mediated block (simultaneous sinus slowing suggests benign vagal surge) 1, 4
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do NOT assume narrow QRS Type I block is always benign: 60-70% of Type I blocks with bundle branch block are infranodal and require pacing 4
Do NOT diagnose Type II block if:
Do NOT miss concealed His bundle or ventricular extrasystoles: These can mimic both Type I and Type II block (pseudo-AV block) and may be amenable to catheter ablation rather than pacing 2, 8, 4
Do NOT delay pacing in Mobitz Type II: Progression to complete heart block is unpredictable and can be sudden 2
Prognosis
- Type I block without organic heart disease: Benign course; only 1 patient in 19 required pacing over mean 1395-day follow-up 3
- Type I block with organic heart disease: Poor prognosis related to severity of underlying cardiac disease, not the block itself 2, 3
- Type II block (all infranodal blocks): Poor prognosis with frequent progression to higher-degree block and symptoms; untreated chronic infranodal block has poor outcomes 2