What is the appropriate workup for a patient presenting with hematuria (blood in urine)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 19, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Hematuria Workup

All patients with hematuria require confirmation with microscopic urinalysis showing ≥3 RBCs per high-power field on at least two of three properly collected clean-catch midstream specimens before initiating any workup, as dipstick testing alone has only 65-99% specificity and produces false positives. 1

Initial Confirmation and Documentation

  • Verify true hematuria by obtaining microscopic urinalysis demonstrating ≥3 RBCs/HPF on two of three specimens—dipstick positivity alone is insufficient to trigger full evaluation 1, 2
  • Document whether hematuria is gross (visible) or microscopic (only detected under microscope), as gross hematuria carries a 30-40% malignancy risk versus 0.5-5% for microscopic hematuria 1, 3
  • Exclude menstrual contamination in women and confirm proper specimen collection technique 1

Risk Stratification for Malignancy

Once confirmed, stratify patients using the AUA/SUFU 2025 risk classification system based on age, sex, smoking history, and degree of hematuria: 2

High-Risk Features (1.3-6.3% malignancy risk):

  • Males ≥60 years or females ≥60 years 1, 4
  • Smoking history >30 pack-years 1, 4
  • Any history of gross hematuria 1, 4
  • 25 RBCs/HPF 1

  • Occupational exposure to benzenes or aromatic amines 1, 4
  • Irritative voiding symptoms without infection 1, 4

Intermediate-Risk Features (0.2-3.1% malignancy risk):

  • Males 40-59 years 1
  • Females <60 years 1
  • Smoking history 10-30 pack-years 1
  • 11-25 RBCs/HPF 1

Low-Risk Features (0%-0.4% malignancy risk):

  • Males <40 years 1
  • Never smoker or <10 pack-years 1
  • 3-10 RBCs/HPF 1

Distinguish Glomerular from Non-Glomerular Source

Before proceeding with urologic workup, determine if hematuria originates from glomerular disease, which requires nephrology referral instead: 1, 2

Features Suggesting Glomerular Source:

  • >80% dysmorphic RBCs on phase-contrast microscopy 1, 4
  • Red blood cell casts (pathognomonic for glomerular disease) 1, 4
  • Tea-colored or cola-colored urine 1, 4
  • Significant proteinuria (protein-to-creatinine ratio >0.2 g/g) 1, 4
  • Elevated creatinine or declining renal function 1
  • Hypertension accompanying hematuria 1

Features Suggesting Non-Glomerular (Urologic) Source:

  • >80% normal (eumorphic) RBCs 1, 4
  • Bright red blood in urine 1
  • Flank pain, suprapubic pain, or dysuria 1
  • Clots in urine 1

Complete Urologic Evaluation for Non-Glomerular Hematuria

For ALL Gross Hematuria (Regardless of Risk):

Gross hematuria mandates urgent and complete urologic evaluation with both upper and lower tract imaging, even if self-limited, due to 30-40% malignancy risk: 1, 3

  1. Multiphasic CT urography (unenhanced, nephrographic, and excretory phases) to detect renal cell carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, and urolithiasis 1, 2
  2. Cystoscopy (flexible preferred over rigid for less pain and equivalent accuracy) to visualize bladder mucosa, urethra, and ureteral orifices 1, 2
  3. Voided urine cytology in high-risk patients to detect high-grade urothelial carcinomas 1
  4. Serum creatinine to assess renal function 1, 2

For Microscopic Hematuria (Risk-Stratified):

High-Risk Patients:

  • Complete urologic evaluation identical to gross hematuria protocol above 1, 2
  • Cystoscopy and CT urography are both mandatory 1, 2

Intermediate-Risk Patients:

  • Shared decision-making regarding cystoscopy and CT urography 1, 2
  • Most should undergo complete evaluation given 0.2-3.1% malignancy risk 2

Low-Risk Patients:

  • May defer cystoscopy and imaging if no other risk factors present 1, 2
  • However, if any benign cause is not identified, proceed with complete evaluation 1

Laboratory Evaluation

Obtain the following labs for all patients with confirmed hematuria: 1, 2

  • Complete urinalysis with microscopic sediment examination 1, 2
  • Serum creatinine, BUN, and complete metabolic panel 1
  • Urine culture if infection suspected (obtain BEFORE antibiotics) 1, 4
  • Complete blood count with platelets to evaluate for coagulopathy 1

If glomerular source suspected, add: 1

  • Spot urine protein-to-creatinine ratio 1
  • Complement levels (C3, C4) 1
  • ANA and ANCA if vasculitis suspected 1

Special Populations and Considerations

Pediatric Patients:

  • Children with isolated microscopic hematuria without proteinuria or dysmorphic RBCs do NOT require imaging—only clinical follow-up 1, 5
  • For gross hematuria in children, obtain urine culture, urine calcium-to-creatinine ratio, and renal ultrasound (NOT CT) 1, 5
  • Glomerulonephritis and congenital anomalies are most common causes in children 1, 4

Patients on Anticoagulation:

  • Never defer evaluation due to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy—these medications may unmask underlying pathology but do not cause hematuria themselves 1, 4, 2
  • Proceed with full evaluation regardless of medication use 1, 4

Patients with Suspected UTI:

  • Obtain urine culture BEFORE starting antibiotics 1, 4
  • If hematuria persists >2 months despite appropriate antibiotic therapy, this effectively rules out simple UTI and mandates complete urologic evaluation 1
  • Never prescribe additional antibiotics for persistent hematuria without completing cancer workup 1

Follow-Up Protocol for Negative Initial Evaluation

If complete workup is negative but hematuria persists: 1, 2

  • Repeat urinalysis at 6,12,24, and 36 months 1, 2
  • Monitor blood pressure at each visit 1, 2
  • After two consecutive negative annual urinalyses, no further testing needed 1

Immediate re-evaluation warranted if: 1, 2

  • Recurrent gross hematuria develops 1
  • Significant increase in degree of microscopic hematuria 1
  • New urologic symptoms appear 1
  • Development of hypertension, proteinuria, or evidence of glomerular bleeding 1, 2

Nephrology Referral Indications

Refer to nephrology if: 1, 2

  • Persistent significant proteinuria (protein-to-creatinine ratio >0.2 g/g) 1
  • Presence of red cell casts or >80% dysmorphic RBCs 1, 4
  • Elevated creatinine or declining renal function 1
  • Hypertension with hematuria and proteinuria 1
  • Hematuria persists with development of any glomerular features 1, 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never ignore gross hematuria, even if self-limited—30-40% malignancy risk mandates urgent urologic referral 1, 3
  • Never attribute hematuria to anticoagulation alone—complete evaluation required regardless 1, 4
  • Never rely on dipstick alone—confirm with microscopic urinalysis showing ≥3 RBCs/HPF 1, 2
  • Never treat asymptomatic bacteriuria with pyuria and hematuria—hematuria requires urologic evaluation, not antibiotics 1
  • Never defer workup in elderly males with gross hematuria—this population has highest malignancy risk and requires immediate cystoscopy and CT urography 1

References

Guideline

Hematuria Evaluation and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of Microscopic Hematuria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Hematuria.

Primary care, 2019

Guideline

Hematuria Evaluation and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Hematuria. An integrated medical and surgical approach.

Pediatric clinics of North America, 1997

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.