What treatment approach is recommended for an adult patient with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction using dapagliflozin?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

DAPA-HF Trial Summary

Primary Trial Design and Population

The DAPA-HF trial enrolled 4,744 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF ≤40%), NYHA class II-IV symptoms, and elevated NT-proBNP levels, comparing dapagliflozin 10 mg daily to placebo on top of guideline-directed medical therapy. 1, 2

  • Mean patient age was 66 years, with 23% women and 55% without diabetes 1
  • 94% were on ACE inhibitor/ARB/ARNI, 96% on beta-blocker, and 71% on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist at baseline 2
  • Patients were enrolled from 410 sites across 20 countries between February 2017 and August 2018, with final follow-up in June 2019 1

Primary Outcome Results

Dapagliflozin reduced the primary composite outcome of worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death by 26% (HR 0.74,95% CI 0.65-0.85). 3

  • First worsening heart failure events were reduced by 30% 3
  • Cardiovascular death was reduced by 18% 3
  • All-cause mortality was reduced by 31% 4

Diabetes-Independent Benefits

The treatment effect was completely independent of diabetes status, with identical benefit in patients with and without diabetes. 1

  • In patients without diabetes: HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.60-0.88) for the primary outcome 1
  • In patients with diabetes: HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.63-0.90) for the primary outcome 1
  • Among non-diabetic patients with HbA1c <5.7% (normoglycemic): HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.96) 1
  • Among non-diabetic patients with HbA1c ≥5.7% (pre-diabetes): HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.94) 1

Age-Related Efficacy

Dapagliflozin demonstrated consistent benefit across all age groups from 22 to 94 years, with no significant interaction by age (P=0.76). 5

  • Age <55 years: HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.60-1.28) 5
  • Age 55-64 years: HR 0.71 (95% CI 0.55-0.93) 5
  • Age 65-74 years: HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.61-0.95) 5
  • Age ≥75 years: HR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53-0.88) 5
  • 24% of enrolled patients were ≥75 years old 5

Severe Heart Failure Subgroup

Among patients meeting criteria for severe heart failure (NYHA III/IV, recent hospitalization, KCCQ <75), dapagliflozin remained safe and effective. 6

  • 296 patients (6.2%) with LVEF ≤40% met severe HF criteria 6
  • Treatment effect was consistent regardless of severe HF status (P for interaction = 0.48) 6
  • Safety profile remained favorable even in this high-risk population 6

Renal Function Considerations

Dapagliflozin was effective in patients with moderate renal impairment down to eGFR ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m². 7, 8

  • The trial included 1,926 patients with eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m² 8
  • A mild, transient eGFR decline may occur after initiation but provides long-term kidney protection 7
  • Once enrolled, patients were not required to discontinue if eGFR fell below 30 mL/min/1.73 m² 8

Safety Profile

Dapagliflozin demonstrated a favorable safety profile with minimal adverse events. 1

  • Volume depletion: 7.3% with dapagliflozin vs 6.1% with placebo in non-diabetic patients 1
  • Kidney adverse events: 4.8% with dapagliflozin vs 6.0% with placebo in non-diabetic patients 1
  • Low risk of hypoglycemia, lower limb amputations, bone fracture, and diabetic ketoacidosis 7
  • Study drug discontinuation rates were similar between groups across all age ranges 5

Unique Pharmacologic Advantages

SGLT2 inhibitors like dapagliflozin require no dose titration and have minimal effects on blood pressure, heart rate, or potassium levels. 7

  • Benefits occur within weeks of drug initiation 7
  • Effectiveness is maintained regardless of whether patients received ≥50% of target doses of background HF medications 7
  • No dose adjustment needed for age, sex, or background therapy 4

Clinical Implementation Recommendations

Dapagliflozin should be initiated at 10 mg once daily in all eligible HFrEF patients, ideally during hospitalization in stabilized patients. 3, 4

  • The American College of Cardiology provides a Class I recommendation for SGLT2 inhibitors in all symptomatic HFrEF patients 3
  • Deferring initiation to outpatient follow-up results in many eligible patients never receiving the medication within 1 year 3
  • Continue existing guideline-directed medical therapy as dapagliflozin provides additive benefit 9

Related Questions

What is the optimal treatment approach for a patient with heart failure, hyponatremia, anemia, and symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea, who is currently on Carvedilol and Dapagliflozin among other medications?
What is the best management approach for an elderly male patient with a history of diabetes mellitus (DM) and congestive heart failure (CHF), presenting with anemia, normal iron levels, and impaired renal function, who is currently taking dapagliflozin (Forxiga) and ramipril (Altace)?
What is the role of dapagliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitor) in chronic heart failure?
Can Farxiga (dapagliflozin) help with diastolic heart failure?
What are the alternatives to Farxiga (dapagliflozin)?
When is a shoulder x-ray (radiograph) recommended for a patient with suspected shoulder injury or persistent shoulder pain, considering their age, medical history, and specific symptoms?
When to add vildagliptin or gliclazide to metformin in a patient with uncontrolled hyperglycemia?
What is the best initial antibiotic for an adult patient with pneumonia and potential underlying health conditions, assuming no known allergies to penicillin or fluoroquinolones?
Why would a calcium coronary score, also known as a coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, be denied by an insurance company for an asymptomatic patient without significant risk factors for coronary artery disease?
What is the differential diagnosis and management for a patient with a hemorrhagic (characterized by bleeding) pleural effusion, considering potential underlying causes such as cancer, trauma, or bleeding disorders?
What is a suitable treatment option for a patient with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and uncontrolled hyperglycemia, already on metformin, considering medications like GLP-1 (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1) Receptor Agonists (RAs) such as liraglutide (Victoza) or semaglutide (Ozempic)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.