Warm AIHA: Intravenous Steroid Treatment
For warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia requiring IV steroids, administer high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone at ≥1 mg/kg daily as early as possible, particularly in severe or acute presentations. 1
Treatment Stratification by Severity
Grade 1 (Mild): Hemoglobin <LLN to 10.0 g/dL
- Close clinical follow-up with laboratory monitoring may be sufficient without immediate corticosteroid therapy 1
- Monitor hemoglobin, reticulocyte count, bilirubin, LDH, haptoglobin, and direct antiglobulin test (DAT) 1
Grade 2 (Moderate): Hemoglobin <10.0 to 8.0 g/dL
- Initiate oral prednisone 0.5-1 mg/kg/day 1
- This represents the threshold where corticosteroid therapy becomes necessary
Grade 3-4 (Severe): Hemoglobin <8.0 g/dL or transfusion indicated
- Administer prednisone 1-2 mg/kg/day, with IV route preferred for symptomatic patients 1
- High-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (≥1 mg/kg) should be given as early as possible in acute severe cases 1
- Consider hospital admission for close monitoring 1
- RBC transfusion should be considered for symptomatic patients, using minimum units necessary 1
First-Line IV Steroid Regimen
The standard approach is high-dose IV methylprednisolone at doses ≥1 mg/kg daily, with treatment response monitored through hemoglobin levels, reticulocyte count, and DAT 1. Corticosteroids remain the first-line treatment for warm AIHA, with an 80% clinical response rate after 3 weeks of treatment 2.
Treatment Goals and Monitoring
- Complete normalization of hemoglobin and laboratory parameters should be the treatment goal 1
- Regular assessment should include hemoglobin, reticulocyte count, bilirubin, LDH, and haptoglobin to evaluate response 1
- Response typically occurs within several days to several weeks 2
Important Caveats
Avoid IV anti-D in patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia, as it can exacerbate hemolysis 1. This is a critical safety consideration that distinguishes AIHA management from immune thrombocytopenia, where IV anti-D may be appropriate 3.
Second-Line Options for Steroid-Refractory Disease
If patients fail to respond adequately to IV steroids:
- Rituximab (375 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks) has become the preferred second-line treatment with 70-80% effectiveness 1
- IVIG 0.3-0.5 g/kg can provide rapid but temporary improvement 1
- Splenectomy offers success rates up to 70% in idiopathic warm AIHA 2
Third-Line Immunosuppressive Options
For patients refractory to steroids and rituximab:
- Cyclophosphamide 1-2 mg/kg/day 1
- Cyclosporine 3 mg/kg/day, adjusted for target trough levels between 100-150 ng/mL 1
- Azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, or alemtuzumab as additional alternatives 2, 4
Practical Considerations
While corticosteroids are highly effective initially, clinicians must balance efficacy against adverse events including excessive weight gain, neuropsychiatric disorders, endocrine complications, and cardiovascular events 2. The goal is to achieve disease control with IV steroids acutely, then transition to oral therapy with gradual taper while monitoring for relapse.