What is the next line of therapy for a patient with refractory multiple myeloma who has previously been treated with daratumumab (Darzalex)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Refractory Multiple Myeloma Post-Daratumumab

For patients with daratumumab-refractory multiple myeloma, prioritize CAR-T cell therapy (idecabtagene vicleucel or ciltacabtagene autoleucel) if triple-class refractory, or alternatively use isatuximab-based combinations (IsaPd or IsaKd), elotuzumab with pomalidomide-dexamethasone (EloPd), or selinexor-based triplets depending on prior exposures. 1

Primary Recommendation: CAR-T Cell Therapy for Triple-Class Refractory Disease

If your patient is refractory to daratumumab, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), CAR-T therapy is the preferred next option rather than continuing with additional chemotherapy combinations. 1

  • The FDA has approved idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) for patients with ≥4 prior therapies including lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and daratumumab. 1
  • CAR-T demonstrates markedly superior efficacy with 71-97% response rates in heavily pretreated populations. 1
  • The KarMMa trial showed 73% overall response rate with 33% complete response in patients with median 6 prior lines where 94% were anti-CD38 refractory. 1
  • The CARTITUDE-1 trial demonstrated 96.9% overall response rate with 88% being triple-class refractory. 1

Alternative Options When CAR-T Is Not Immediately Available

For Patients Previously Exposed to Lenalidomide and a PI (Post-Daratumumab)

Isatuximab-based combinations are the strongest alternative, as isatuximab is a different anti-CD38 antibody that may retain activity after daratumumab failure. 2

  • Isatuximab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone (IsaPd): Phase III trial showed median PFS of 11.5 months versus 6.5 months for pomalidomide-dexamethasone alone (HR 0.596; P = 0.001) in patients who failed ≥2 prior lines including lenalidomide and a PI. 2

  • Isatuximab + carfilzomib + dexamethasone (IsaKd): In patients with 1-3 prior lines, median PFS was not reached for IsaKd versus 19.1 months for carfilzomib-dexamethasone (HR 0.53; P = 0.0007), with benefit maintained in lenalidomide-refractory patients (HR 0.60). 2

  • Elotuzumab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone (EloPd): Phase II study showed median PFS of 10.3 months versus 4.7 months for pomalidomide-dexamethasone (HR 0.54; P = 0.008). 2

Selinexor-Based Triplet Regimens

Selinexor triplets are particularly effective in daratumumab-exposed patients and offer a PI- and IMiD-free alternative. 3, 4

  • Selinexor + daratumumab + dexamethasone (SDd): In daratumumab-naïve RRMM patients, this combination achieved 73% overall response rate with median PFS of 12.5 months. 3
  • Real-world data shows patients with prior anti-CD38 exposure in the immediate prior line had numerically higher survival outcomes (rwOS 20.9 months, dPFS 8.7 months) when treated with selinexor triplets. 4
  • Selinexor + bortezomib + dexamethasone (SVd): Phase III trial showed median PFS of 13.9 versus 9.4 months compared to bortezomib-dexamethasone (HR 0.70, P = 0.0066). 2

For Triple-Class Refractory Patients Without CAR-T Access

When CAR-T is not available, selinexor-dexamethasone or belantamab mafodotin monotherapy are options, though with more modest efficacy. 2

  • Selinexor + dexamethasone (Sd): In the STORM trial with 122 heavily pretreated patients (median 7 prior lines, all refractory to PIs, IMiDs, and daratumumab), overall response rate was 26% with median PFS 3.7 months and median OS 8.6 months. 2, 5

  • Common adverse events include fatigue, nausea, and decreased appetite (typically grade 1-2), with thrombocytopenia in 73% (grade 3-4 in 58%). 2, 5

  • Belantamab mafodotin: BCMA-targeting antibody-drug conjugate showed median PFS of 2.9-4.9 months in triple-class refractory patients, though it is being withdrawn from the market after failing to show superiority in the DREAMM-3 trial. 2

  • Available through compassionate use for patients already receiving it. 2

Special Consideration: t(11;14) Patients

For patients with t(11;14) translocation who are lenalidomide-refractory and PI-sensitive, venetoclax + bortezomib + dexamethasone (VenVd) is an option. 2

  • Phase III BELLINI trial showed significant PFS benefit among t(11;14) patients (HR 0.10; P = 0.003). 2
  • Critical caveat: VenVd showed inferior OS in patients without t(11;14) and low BCL2 (HR 3.13; P = 0.019), so this should only be used in confirmed t(11;14) or high BCL2 expression. 2

Important Clinical Context

The prognosis for triple-class refractory patients is poor, with median OS of only 5.6 months, making aggressive therapy with CAR-T or clinical trial enrollment critical. 2

  • For daratumumab-exposed or refractory patients, guideline recommendations are based on panel opinion as there is limited prospective evidence for approved second-line regimens in this specific population. 2
  • Daratumumab retreatment has limited retrospective evidence of benefit, and isatuximab after daratumumab progression is an unlikely option based on cross-resistance concerns. 2

Treatment Algorithm Summary

  1. Triple-class refractory (PI + IMiD + anti-CD38): CAR-T cell therapy (ide-cel or cilta-cel) is preferred 1
  2. Daratumumab-refractory, lenalidomide-refractory: IsaPd or IsaKd 2
  3. Daratumumab-refractory, not yet triple-class exposed: Selinexor-based triplets (SDd, SVd, or with carfilzomib) 3, 4
  4. t(11;14) with lenalidomide-refractory, PI-sensitive: VenVd 2
  5. Heavily pretreated without CAR-T access: Selinexor-dexamethasone or clinical trial 2, 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.