Management of Size-Dates Discrepancy at 20 Weeks
This is a constitutionally small but appropriately growing fetus that requires serial ultrasound surveillance every 2-3 weeks, with umbilical artery Doppler assessment to differentiate between normal small size and pathological growth restriction. 1, 2
Initial Assessment and Dating Verification
The 11-day discrepancy between dates (20+2 weeks) and ultrasound measurements (18+3 weeks) requires careful evaluation:
- Verify dating accuracy using first-trimester crown-rump length (CRL) measurement if available, as this is the most reliable method to establish gestational age and is accurate within 3-5 days 2, 3, 4
- If first-trimester dating was performed and reliable, the current measurements suggest the fetus is tracking below the 10th percentile, meeting criteria for suspected fetal growth restriction 1, 2
- Do not re-date the pregnancy based on this second-trimester scan - once gestational age is established by accurate early ultrasound, subsequent scans should only assess growth velocity, not recalculate dates 3
Current Risk Stratification
Your patient's findings are reassuring but require ongoing monitoring:
- Normal amniotic fluid index (AFI 14) and normal Doppler studies indicate this is likely a small but healthy fetus rather than pathological FGR 1, 2
- The absence of structural anomalies reduces concern for chromosomal abnormalities or syndromic growth restriction 5
- Normal umbilical artery Doppler is the single most important predictor of favorable outcome in suspected FGR 2
Surveillance Protocol
Implement the following monitoring schedule based on current findings:
- Serial ultrasound examinations every 2-3 weeks to assess growth velocity, as this interval represents consensus among international guidelines 1, 2
- At each visit, measure biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length to calculate estimated fetal weight (EFW) 2, 3
- Perform umbilical artery Doppler at every scan starting now, as this is mandatory once FGR is suspected 2
- Document EFW percentile and calculate growth velocity between scans 1, 2
Doppler Surveillance Frequency
Adjust monitoring intensity based on Doppler findings:
- If umbilical artery Doppler remains normal: continue every 2 weeks 2
- If decreased end-diastolic velocity develops (flow ratios >95th percentile): increase to weekly surveillance 2
- If absent end-diastolic velocity: increase to 2-3 times per week and consider hospitalization 2
- If reversed end-diastolic velocity: immediate hospitalization, corticosteroids, and delivery planning 2
Additional Assessments
Perform the following evaluations:
- Detailed anatomic survey to exclude structural abnormalities if not already completed at this 20-week scan 2, 5
- Assess for soft markers of aneuploidy, as growth restriction before 32 weeks warrants consideration of genetic testing 5
- Consider chromosomal microarray analysis if growth restriction is confirmed on serial scans (EFW persistently <10th percentile with declining growth velocity) or if any structural abnormalities are identified 5
- Evaluate maternal risk factors: smoking status, chronic hypertension, prior preeclampsia, prior FGR, autoimmune conditions 1, 2
Preventive Interventions
Low-dose aspirin is NOT indicated at this gestational age, as the window for prevention has closed - aspirin must be initiated before 16 weeks (ideally) or by 20 weeks at the latest to reduce risk of placental insufficiency 1, 2
Delivery Planning
Timing of delivery will depend on growth trajectory and Doppler findings:
- If EFW remains 3rd-10th percentile with normal umbilical artery Doppler throughout pregnancy: deliver at 38-39 weeks 2
- If decreased diastolic flow develops OR EFW falls below 3rd percentile: deliver at 37 weeks 2
- If absent end-diastolic velocity: deliver at 33-34 weeks after corticosteroids 2
- If reversed end-diastolic velocity: deliver at 30-32 weeks after corticosteroids and magnesium sulfate 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume incorrect dates without first-trimester confirmation - LMP-based dating has substantial error (17.2% of records show >14 days discrepancy), but second-trimester biometry should not override reliable first-trimester CRL dating 6
- Do not rely on fundal height measurements alone, especially in obese patients where fundal height is unreliable 2, 7
- Do not delay surveillance - in obese women without comorbidities, growth abnormalities are rarely diagnosed before 32 weeks, but this patient already has a size discrepancy warranting closer monitoring 7
- Do not use sildenafil, activity restriction, or heparin for treatment of FGR, as these interventions lack evidence of benefit 2
Antenatal Interventions if Early Delivery Needed
Should surveillance reveal deterioration requiring preterm delivery: