What are the implications of a 17-inch head circumference in a 2-month-old patient and what is the recommended course of action?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Assessment of 17-Inch Head Circumference in a 2-Month-Old

A 17-inch (43.2 cm) head circumference in a 2-month-old is above the 97th percentile and requires immediate evaluation to determine if this represents benign familial megalencephaly or a pathologic process requiring intervention. 1, 2

Immediate Clinical Assessment

Accurate Measurement Confirmation

  • Remeasure head circumference using proper technique: place a firm, non-stretchable measuring tape just above the supraorbital ridges anteriorly and around the occiput posteriorly to obtain maximum circumference, with sufficient tension to compress hair against the skull 3, 2
  • Record measurement to the nearest 0.1 cm and plot on WHO growth charts, as these are recommended for children under 24 months 3, 2
  • Review all previous head circumference measurements from birth to determine growth trajectory—serial measurements are far more valuable than a single data point for identifying abnormal patterns 1, 2

Critical History Elements to Obtain

  • Parental head circumferences: Measure both parents' head circumferences, particularly the same-sex parent, as benign familial megalencephaly is the most common cause of isolated macrocephaly 1, 4
  • Symptoms of increased intracranial pressure: Assess for rapidly enlarging head circumference, increased splaying of cranial sutures, full/tense fontanel, worsening apnea and bradycardia, lethargy, feeding intolerance, or vomiting 1
  • Developmental concerns: Screen for motor delays, regression of previously acquired skills, or asymmetric motor development 1
  • Seizure history: Evaluate for any nonfebrile seizures, which may indicate underlying structural brain abnormalities 1

Physical Examination Priorities

  • Fontanel assessment: Check for full, tense, or bulging anterior fontanel, which suggests elevated intracranial pressure requiring urgent evaluation 1
  • Neurologic examination: Assess for altered level of consciousness, abnormal tone, persistence of primitive reflexes, absent protective reflexes, cranial nerve abnormalities, or focal neurologic deficits 1
  • Ophthalmologic examination: Perform fundoscopic examination to evaluate for papilledema, which indicates increased intracranial pressure 1
  • Growth parameters: Measure and plot weight and length to identify disproportionate growth patterns—preservation of length with excessive head growth suggests a primary cranial process 1, 2

Decision Algorithm for Neuroimaging

Proceed with MRI (preferred over CT) if ANY of the following are present:

  • Signs of symptomatic hydrocephalus (bulging fontanel, splayed sutures, vomiting, lethargy) 1
  • Abnormal neurologic examination findings 1
  • Papilledema or visual changes on fundoscopic examination 1
  • Disproportionate growth (head circumference crossing percentiles upward while weight/length remain stable) 1
  • Rapidly accelerating head growth trajectory on serial measurements 1
  • Developmental delays or regression 1

Neuroimaging is NOT routinely indicated if:

  • Both parents have large head circumferences (suggesting benign familial megalencephaly) 1, 4
  • Stable growth trajectory parallel to but above the 97th percentile 1
  • Completely normal neurologic examination 1
  • No symptoms of increased intracranial pressure 1

Follow-Up Protocol

For Infants WITHOUT Concerning Features

  • Serial measurements every 2-4 weeks to monitor growth trajectory and ensure the head circumference curve remains parallel to growth charts rather than crossing percentiles 1
  • Developmental surveillance at each visit to identify emerging concerns, as intellectual delay is the most common disability associated with abnormal head growth 1, 5
  • Reassess immediately if clinical status changes, including new symptoms, developmental regression, or accelerating head growth 1

Referral Indications

  • Consider genetics or neurology referral if syndromic features are present, developmental delays emerge, or growth pattern remains concerning despite benign initial workup 1
  • An interdisciplinary approach is warranted if microcephaly or macrocephaly is associated with other anomalies, including epilepsy, cerebral palsy, language delay, strabismus, ophthalmologic disorders, or cardiac/renal/skeletal anomalies 5

Key Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not dismiss macrocephaly without measuring parental head circumferences—failure to compare with same-sex parent head size is a common error that leads to unnecessary imaging 4
  • Do not rely on a single measurement—growth trajectory over time is more diagnostically valuable than any isolated measurement 1, 2
  • Do not assume head growth stops at 36 months—the cranium continues growing through adolescence, and ongoing monitoring beyond infancy may be clinically indicated 4
  • Do not order CT when MRI is available—MRI is preferred for evaluating structural brain abnormalities without radiation exposure 1

References

Guideline

Evaluation and Management of High Head Circumference in Children

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Neonatal Head Circumference Measurement and Its Clinical Significance

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Measuring head circumference: Update on infant microcephaly.

Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2015

Related Questions

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.