Management and Identification of Biceps Tendon Rupture
Diagnostic Approach
Begin with plain radiographs (minimum 3 views: AP in internal and external rotation, plus axillary or scapular-Y view) to exclude fractures, glenohumeral dislocation, and bony Bankart lesions, followed by MRI without contrast as the definitive imaging study, which has 86.4% accuracy compared to ultrasound's 45.5% for complete tears. 1, 2, 3
Clinical Presentation
Proximal (Long Head) Biceps Rupture:
- Sudden painful tearing sensation with visible "Popeye" deformity (proximal migration of muscle belly) 4, 5
- More common than distal tears, particularly atraumatic ruptures involving the long head in 89% of cases 3
- Partial rupture of the long head with intact short head represents the most common injury pattern 3
Distal Biceps Rupture:
- Occurs in 3% of all biceps ruptures, typically in middle-aged males (40-60 years) in the dominant extremity 6, 7
- Sudden sharp pain in antecubital fossa with palpable defect after eccentric extension load 2, 6
- Insidious onset with load-related localized antecubital pain that initially subsides after warm-up but progressively worsens 2
Physical Examination Findings
- Inspection: Look for muscle atrophy, asymmetry, swelling, erythema, and visible deformity of the biceps muscle belly 2, 7
- Palpation: Well-localized tenderness that reproduces pain; ability to palpate intact tendon in antecubital fossa suggests partial tear 2, 7
- Specific tests: Biceps squeeze test and hook test for distal ruptures 6
- Functional assessment: Weakness in flexion and supination strength 6, 7
Imaging Protocol
Step 1: Plain Radiographs 1, 2, 3
- Obtain upright positioning (not supine) to avoid underrepresenting shoulder malalignment 1
- May show hypertrophic bone formation at radial tuberosity in distal ruptures 7
Step 2: MRI Without Contrast (Preferred) 1, 2, 3
- Superior accuracy (86.4%) for distinguishing partial from complete tears 1, 2
- Use FABS view (flexion-abduction-supination): patient prone, elbow flexed 90°, shoulder abducted, forearm supinated for optimal distal biceps visualization 1, 2, 3
- Demonstrates soft tissue abnormalities with high accuracy 1
- Sensitivity 76%, specificity 50% for biceps tendon tears 1
Step 3: MR Arthrography (When Indicated) 1
- Equally appropriate for post-surgical evaluation 1
- When distinction between full-thickness and partial-thickness tears is unclear 1
- Superior for assessing associated pathologies: rotator cuff tears, pulley lesions, SLAP lesions 1
Alternative: Ultrasound 1, 2, 3
- Only when MRI is contraindicated or unavailable 1, 3
- Accuracy only 45.5% for complete distal tears 1, 3
- Significant limitations in detecting partial tears and tendinopathy 2, 3
- Medial imaging approach preferred with substantial interreader agreement 1
- Can provide ultrasound-guided injection of anesthetic/corticosteroid for diagnostic and therapeutic benefit 1
Management Algorithm
Complete Distal Biceps Rupture
Early surgical anatomic reattachment is the treatment of choice to restore flexion and supination strength and endurance. 6, 8, 4, 7
- Nonoperative treatment results in loss of flexion and supination strength and endurance 6
- Surgical results are superior to conservative treatment in the vast majority of patients 8, 4
- Early anatomic reconstruction (within first 8 weeks) can restore strength and endurance 8, 7
- Surgical options include one- or two-incision techniques with various fixation methods (suture anchors, bone tunnels, endobutton, biotenodesis screws) 6
- Patients do well regardless of surgical approach or fixation method, though endobuttons have higher load-to-failure strengths biomechanically 6
Surgical Complications to Monitor: 6, 4
- Nerve injuries (particularly posterior interosseous nerve palsy) 6, 4
- Heterotopic ossification (occurs in approximately 40% of surgical cases) 8
- Postoperative fracture 6
- Tendon rerupture (rare) 4
- Complex regional pain syndrome 6
- Wound infection 6
- Radioulnar synostosis 4
Proximal (Long Head) Biceps Rupture
Conservative management is often appropriate for proximal ruptures, particularly in older or less active patients, as functional deficits are typically minimal. 5
- Diagnosis usually made on clinical grounds 5
- Left untreated can lead to functional deficits, but these are generally less severe than distal ruptures 5
Partial Ruptures
Initial conservative treatment with relative rest and oral NSAIDs, reserving surgery for failed conservative management. 2, 6
- Significantly less common than complete ruptures 6
- MRI is crucial to distinguish partial from complete tears 1, 2, 3
- Relative rest to decrease repetitive loading 2
- Oral NSAIDs 2
Chronic Tears
Surgical treatment is more challenging but can still be beneficial, often requiring tendon graft augmentation. 6, 4, 7
- Tendon retraction and poor tissue quality complicate repair 6, 4
- Tendon grafts using semitendinosus, fascia lata, hamstring, Achilles, or flexor carpi radialis successfully used for length restoration 6
- Inadequate distal biceps tendon length may necessitate augmentation 7
Postoperative Rehabilitation
Protected return of motion for first 8 weeks, formal strengthening beginning at 8 weeks, unrestricted activities including lifting by 5 months. 7
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failing to distinguish between partial and complete tears: Requires MRI, not clinical examination or ultrasound alone 2, 3
- Relying solely on ultrasound: Has significant limitations (45.5% accuracy) compared to MRI (86.4% accuracy) 1, 2, 3
- Missing associated pathologies: Rotator cuff tears, SLAP lesions, pulley lesions may contribute to symptoms 1, 2
- Delayed surgical referral for complete distal ruptures: Early anatomic reattachment (within 8 weeks) provides optimal outcomes 8, 7
- Inadequate nerve protection during surgery: Meticulous attention to posterior interosseous nerve decreases complication risk 4