What are the results of the DELIVER study on dapagliflozin (Dapagliflozin) for patients with heart failure (HF), including those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and its efficacy in patients with a history of diabetes, hypertension, or impaired renal function?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

DELIVER Trial Summary: Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Preserved/Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

The DELIVER trial demonstrated that dapagliflozin 10 mg daily reduces cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure events by 18% in patients with heart failure and ejection fraction >40%, with benefits occurring regardless of diabetes status, background medications, or renal function down to eGFR ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m². 1, 2

Trial Design and Population

  • DELIVER was an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 6,263 patients aged ≥40 years with symptomatic heart failure (NYHA class II-IV) and LVEF >40%. 2, 3

  • Patients required elevated natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP ≥300 pg/mL or ≥600 pg/mL for those in atrial fibrillation/flutter) and evidence of structural heart disease. 3

  • The trial included 3,131 patients randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg daily and 3,132 to placebo, with median follow-up of 28 months (2.3 years). 2, 4

  • Approximately 10% of patients were randomized during hospitalization for heart failure or within 30 days of discharge. 2

Primary Outcome Results

  • Dapagliflozin reduced the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure, or urgent heart failure visit by 18% (HR 0.82 [95% CI 0.73-0.92]; P=0.0008). 1, 2

  • Event rates were 7.8 per 100 patient-years with dapagliflozin versus 9.6 per 100 patient-years with placebo. 2

  • All three components of the primary endpoint individually contributed to the treatment effect, with the dapagliflozin and placebo event curves separating early and continuing to diverge throughout the trial period. 2

Component Outcomes

  • Hospitalization for heart failure or urgent heart failure visit: reduced by 21% (HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.69-0.91]). 2

  • Hospitalization for heart failure alone: reduced by 23% (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.67-0.89]). 2

  • Cardiovascular death: HR 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.05), showing a trend toward benefit though not statistically significant as a single component. 2

  • Urgent heart failure visits: reduced by 24% (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.55-1.07]). 2

Efficacy Across Subgroups

Diabetes Status

  • Benefits were consistent across glycemic categories: normoglycemia (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.57-1.04]), prediabetes (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.69-1.08]), and type 2 diabetes (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.69-0.95]; p for interaction=0.82). 4

  • The heart failure benefits of dapagliflozin were consistent across the continuous HbA1c range (p for interaction=0.85), demonstrating effects independent of glucose-lowering. 1, 4

  • Of the 6,263 patients, 1,175 had normoglycemia, 1,934 had prediabetes, and 3,150 had type 2 diabetes. 4

Background Medications

  • At baseline, 77% of patients were on ACE inhibitor/ARB/ARNI, 83% on beta-blocker, 43% on mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and 98% on diuretics. 2

  • Treatment benefits were consistent regardless of whether patients received ≥50% of target doses of background heart failure medications. 5, 6

Diuretic Use

  • Benefits were consistent across diuretic categories: no diuretic (10.9% of patients), non-loop diuretic (12.3%), and loop diuretic doses of <40 mg, 40 mg, and >40 mg furosemide equivalent (76.8% total on loop diuretics; p for interaction=0.64). 7

  • Dapagliflozin reduced new initiation of loop diuretics by 32% (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.55-0.84]; P<0.001). 7

  • The mean dose of loop diuretic increased over time in the placebo arm, an increase that was significantly attenuated with dapagliflozin (placebo-corrected treatment effect of -2.5 mg/year; 95% CI: -1.5 to -3.7; P<0.001). 7

Previous Myocardial Infarction

  • In pooled analysis with DAPA-HF, 34% of patients had previous MI, which conferred higher risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR 1.12 [95% CI 1.02-1.24]). 8

  • Dapagliflozin reduced the primary outcome similarly in patients with (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.72-0.96]) and without previous MI (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.68-0.85]; p for interaction=0.36). 8

Renal Function Considerations

  • An initial eGFR decline is expected and frequent with dapagliflozin but does not indicate harm. 9

  • Median eGFR change from baseline to month 1 was -4 mL/min/1.73 m² (-9 to 1) with dapagliflozin versus -1 mL/min/1.73 m² (-6 to 5) with placebo (difference -3; P<0.001). 9

  • 40% of dapagliflozin-treated patients developed an initial eGFR decline >10% versus 25% with placebo (OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.7-2.1]). 9

  • Critical clinical point: An initial eGFR decline >10% was associated with higher cardiovascular risk in placebo patients (adjusted HR 1.33 [95% CI 1.10-1.62]) but NOT in dapagliflozin-treated patients (adjusted HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.74-1.09]; p for interaction=0.01). 9

  • Initial eGFR decline >10% was not associated with adverse kidney composite outcomes in dapagliflozin-treated patients (adjusted HR 0.94 [95% CI 0.49-1.82]). 9

  • These data reinforce that dapagliflozin should not be interrupted or discontinued in response to an initial eGFR decline. 1, 9

Safety Profile

  • Serious adverse events were similar between dapagliflozin and placebo arms, irrespective of diuretic use or dosing. 7

  • Volume-related or renal serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, hypoglycemia, and amputations were not differentially affected by treatment in any glycemic category. 4

  • Dapagliflozin has minimal blood pressure effects, with no excess risk of symptomatic hypotension. 1

  • Safety considerations include monitoring for euglycemic ketoacidosis (though risk is significantly lower in non-diabetic populations), genital mycotic infections (1.5-1.7%), and urinary tract infections (2.3-2.7%). 5

Clinical Implementation

  • Dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily is the recommended dose with no need for titration or adjustment based on heart failure symptoms. 6

  • The medication can be initiated in patients with eGFR ≥25 mL/min/1.73 m², and if eGFR falls below 25 mL/min/1.73 m² while on treatment, dapagliflozin can be continued for cardiovascular benefit until dialysis. 6

  • Dapagliflozin should be initiated during heart failure hospitalization in stabilized patients, as deferring initiation results in many eligible patients never receiving the medication within 1 year. 1

  • Benefits occur within weeks of initiation and are maintained regardless of age, sex, or background medical therapy. 6

  • Unlike many heart failure medications, dapagliflozin does not affect blood pressure, heart rate, or potassium levels, making it easier to combine with other guideline-directed medical therapy. 6

References

Guideline

SGLT2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Dapagliflozin Use in Non-Diabetic Patients with HFrEF or CKD

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Dapagliflozin Dosing in Diastolic Heart Failure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.