How do I rule out a pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis in a patient presenting with shortness of breath and tachycardia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism: A Structured Diagnostic Approach

To safely eliminate a PE diagnosis, you must first stratify pretest probability using a validated clinical prediction rule (Wells or revised Geneva score), then apply either PERC criteria (for low-risk patients under 50) or D-dimer testing with age-adjusted cutoffs (for patients over 50 or those who are PERC-positive), avoiding imaging entirely when these criteria safely exclude PE. 1

Step 1: Calculate Pretest Probability

Use either the Wells score or revised Geneva score to categorize your patient 1:

Revised Geneva Score Components 1:

  • Previous PE or DVT: 3 points (original) / 1 point (simplified)
  • Heart rate 75-94 bpm: 3 points / 1 point
  • Heart rate ≥95 bpm: 5 points / 2 points
  • Surgery or fracture within past month: 2 points / 1 point
  • Hemoptysis: 2 points / 1 point
  • Active cancer: 2 points / 1 point
  • Unilateral lower-limb pain: 3 points / 1 point
  • Pain on deep venous palpation and unilateral edema: 4 points / 1 point
  • Age >65 years: 1 point / 1 point

Risk Stratification 1:

  • Low probability: 0-3 points (original) or 0-1 (simplified) — ~10% PE prevalence
  • Intermediate probability: 4-10 points (original) or 2-4 (simplified) — ~30% PE prevalence
  • High probability: ≥11 points (original) or ≥5 (simplified) — ~65% PE prevalence

Two-level classification:

  • PE-unlikely: 0-5 points (original) or 0-2 (simplified) — ~12% PE prevalence
  • PE-likely: ≥6 points (original) or ≥3 (simplified) — ~30% PE prevalence

Step 2: Apply PERC Rule (Low Pretest Probability Patients Only)

If your patient has LOW pretest probability, apply the 8 PERC criteria 1:

All 8 Criteria Must Be Met 1:

  1. Age <50 years
  2. Heart rate <100 beats per minute
  3. Oxygen saturation >94% (at sea level)
  4. No unilateral leg swelling
  5. No hemoptysis
  6. No recent trauma or surgery
  7. No history of VTE (prior PE or DVT)
  8. No hormone use (oral contraceptives or hormone replacement)

If ALL 8 PERC criteria are met: PE is ruled out. Stop here. No D-dimer, no imaging. 1, 2

Critical Caveat About PERC:

PERC should ONLY be applied to patients with LOW pretest probability 1. The sensitivity is 96-97% with a negative likelihood ratio of 0.15, yielding a false-negative rate of approximately 1.4% 1. However, some studies in populations with higher PE prevalence have shown PERC may miss up to 6-8% of cases 3, 4, so never apply PERC to intermediate or high-risk patients 1.

Step 3: D-Dimer Testing Strategy

For Low or Intermediate Pretest Probability Patients Who Are PERC-Positive:

Use high-sensitivity D-dimer (ELISA or ELISA-derived assays with ≥95% sensitivity) 1:

Age-Specific Cutoffs 1, 5:

  • Patients ≤50 years: Use standard cutoff of <500 ng/mL
  • Patients >50 years: Use age-adjusted cutoff = age × 10 ng/mL

The age-adjusted approach is critical because standard D-dimer specificity drops to only 10% in patients over 80 years old 1. Using age-adjusted cutoffs increases the number of patients in whom PE can be excluded from 6.4% to 30% without additional false-negative findings 1, 5.

Specificity Improvements with Age-Adjusted D-Dimer 5:

  • Ages 51-60: specificity increases from 57.6% to 62.3%
  • Ages 61-70: specificity increases from 39.4% to 49.5%
  • Ages 71-80: specificity increases from 24.5% to 44.2%
  • Ages >80: specificity increases from 14.7% to 35.2%

If D-dimer is below the appropriate threshold: PE is ruled out. Stop here. No imaging needed. 1 The negative predictive value is 99.5% when combined with low clinical probability 1.

If D-dimer is elevated above the threshold: Proceed to CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). 1, 2

For High Pretest Probability Patients:

Do NOT order D-dimer. Proceed directly to CTPA. 1 A negative D-dimer does not safely exclude PE in high-risk patients, even with highly sensitive assays 1.

Step 4: When Imaging Cannot Be Avoided

If D-dimer is elevated or pretest probability is high, order CTPA as first-line imaging 1, 6:

Alternative Imaging Options 6:

  • Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan: Reserve for patients with contraindications to CTPA (renal insufficiency, contrast allergy) or when CTPA is unavailable
  • Lower extremity venous ultrasound: Consider in patients with obvious DVT signs, pregnancy, or as adjunct when CTPA is negative but suspicion remains high

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Critical Errors 1, 5, 2:

  1. Never apply PERC to patients over 50 years old — age <50 is one of the eight required criteria 1, 5

  2. Never use standard 500 ng/mL D-dimer cutoff in patients over 50 — this leads to unnecessary imaging due to poor specificity 1, 5

  3. Never order D-dimer in high pretest probability patients — it wastes time and resources; proceed directly to imaging 1

  4. Never apply PERC to intermediate or high-risk patients — this may lead to missed diagnoses 1

  5. Never use point-of-care D-dimer assays when laboratory-based tests are available — they have lower sensitivity (88% vs. 95%) 5

Special Population Considerations

Hospitalized Patients 5:

D-dimer specificity is lower in inpatients due to comorbidities (cancer, infection, inflammatory disease), but testing remains appropriate as sensitivity stays high. The number needed to test rises from 3 in the general ED population to ≥10 in hospitalized patients 1.

Pregnant Patients 1:

D-dimer is frequently elevated during pregnancy. Consider lower-extremity venous ultrasonography before CT in first trimester to reduce radiation exposure 5.

Cancer Patients 1:

D-dimer is more frequently elevated in patients with active malignancy, reducing specificity but maintaining high sensitivity for ruling out PE when negative.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Low Suspicion Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Retrospective validation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria rule in 'PE unlikely' patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.

European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 2018

Guideline

Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Testing for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Protocol for Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.