Indications for TIPS Procedure
TIPS is indicated for carefully selected cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites (superior to large volume paracentesis for both ascites control and transplant-free survival), acute variceal hemorrhage in high-risk patients, and recurrent variceal bleeding despite standard therapy. 1
Primary Indications by Clinical Scenario
Refractory Ascites and Hepatic Hydrothorax
For refractory ascites, TIPS is recommended over serial large volume paracentesis to prevent recurrent ascites and improve transplant-free survival. 1
Refractory ascites is defined as ascites unresponsive to maximum diuretic therapy (spironolactone 400 mg/day and furosemide 160 mg/day) or development of diuretic-induced complications. 1
Recurrent ascites requiring at least 3 large volume paracenteses for tense ascites within one year despite optimal medical therapy qualifies for TIPS consideration, even if not meeting strict refractory criteria. 1
Hepatic hydrothorax requiring recurrent thoracentesis warrants TIPS consideration, though evidence is less robust than for ascites. 1
TIPS should be considered early in the disease course once refractory or recurrent ascites is identified to maximize transplant-free survival benefit. 1
Acute Variceal Hemorrhage
TIPS is indicated in three distinct scenarios for variceal bleeding: 1
Pre-emptive TIPS (within 72 hours of admission): For patients successfully banded but meeting high-risk criteria—Child-Pugh Class C (10-13 points) OR Child-Pugh Class B with >7 points AND active bleeding at endoscopy. 1
Rescue TIPS: For patients successfully banded initially but who rebleed at any time during the same admission after endoscopy. 1
Salvage TIPS: Emergent placement when endoscopic band ligation cannot be performed due to profuse bleeding, or bleeding persists despite endoscopic therapy. 1
A 2025 RCT demonstrated TIPS superiority over esophageal self-expandable metal stents in refractory variceal bleeding, with 6-week mortality of 10% versus 52.4% (p=0.015). 2
Secondary Prevention of Variceal Rebleeding
TIPS serves as second-line therapy for prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage when combined endoscopic band ligation plus non-selective beta-blockers fail or are not tolerated. 1, 3, 4
For bleeding gastric-fundal varices refractory to endoscopic therapy, variceal obliteration with or without TIPS should be considered. 1
Portal Vein Thrombosis in Cirrhosis
When anticoagulation fails in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis, TIPS placement achieves portal vein recanalization in 95% of cases, with 80% portal vein patency and 85% TIPS patency at one year. 1
In cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis awaiting liver transplantation, TIPS with portal vein recanalization enables portal-to-portal anastomosis in 91% of cases. 1
A randomized trial showed TIPS reduced 1-year rebleeding rates compared to endoscopic band ligation plus propranolol (15% vs 45%) in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis. 1
Patient Selection Criteria and Risk Stratification
Relative Contraindications Based on Liver Function
While elevated bilirubin, MELD score, and Child-Pugh Class C are associated with increased post-TIPS complications and mortality, no absolute cutoff exists that should categorically exclude TIPS. 1
Child-Pugh >13 points represents very advanced disease where TIPS generally should not be performed. 4
Most trials excluded patients with bilirubin >5 mg/dl, INR >2, or severe hepatic encephalopathy (>grade 2). 1
Advanced age is significantly associated with post-TIPS complications including severe hepatic encephalopathy and death, though no specific age cutoff is recommended. 1
Absolute Contraindications
TIPS is contraindicated in the following scenarios: 3, 4
- Recurrent overt hepatic encephalopathy without identifiable precipitating factors
- Severe cardiac failure or significant valvular heart disease
- Severe pulmonary hypertension
- Active systemic infection
- Bilirubin >50 μmol/L (approximately 3 mg/dL) with platelets <75×10^9/L 3
Special Populations
Post-liver transplant recipients: Insufficient evidence exists to support TIPS for refractory ascites in this population, and TIPS should generally be reserved for MELD ≤15 (≤12 if HCV-related). 1, 5
Portosinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD): TIPS demonstrates similar efficacy to cirrhotic patients for variceal bleeding with lower mortality and reduced hepatic encephalopathy risk. 1
Technical Approach and Optimization
Stent Selection and Sizing Strategy
For elective TIPS in refractory ascites, use ePTFE-covered controlled expansion stents with a staged dilation approach. 1
Initial procedural stent dilation to 8mm, followed by clinical assessment at 6-week intervals
Progressive dilation to 9mm, then 10mm only if needed to optimize clinical response
Continue concomitant diuretics as tolerated throughout the staged approach 1
This staged approach reduces hepatic encephalopathy risk while maintaining efficacy for ascites control. 1
Expected Timeline for Clinical Response
Reassessment for need to further dilate the TIPS stent should occur every 6 weeks after initial placement. 1
For ascites and hepatic hydrothorax, start with the smallest diameter stent and progressively increase only as clinically indicated. 1
Common Pitfalls and Clinical Caveats
Hepatic encephalopathy develops in approximately 30-50% of patients post-TIPS, with higher rates in conventional versus constrained TIPS approaches. 1, 3
In severe refractory hepatic encephalopathy (affecting 8% of cases), shunt reduction or occlusion improves or resolves encephalopathy in 48-100% of cases, though this may cause recurrence of the original indication. 6
TIPS in PSC patients: Enhanced risk of infection exists during passage through infected bile ducts; TIPS may be contraindicated if dilated intrahepatic ducts are present in the TIPS tract. 1
The 30-day mortality after TIPS ranges from 10-13%, with Child-Pugh Class C and urgent TIPS placement identified as independent predictors of mortality. 7
TIPS dysfunction from stenosis or thrombosis occurs in up to 80% with uncovered stents, necessitating regular surveillance with Doppler ultrasound at 6-12 month intervals. 1, 8, 6