Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Gastric Cancer
Post-operative chemoradiotherapy (not radiotherapy alone) is recommended for patients with resected gastric cancer who have T3-T4 tumors or node-positive disease, provided they did not receive preoperative therapy and underwent less than optimal (D2) lymph node dissection. 1
Treatment Algorithm Based on Surgical and Pathologic Features
For Patients Who Did NOT Receive Preoperative Therapy:
Early Stage Disease (Tis, T1N0, or T2N0 without high-risk features):
T2N0 with High-Risk Features:
- Fluoropyrimidine-based postoperative chemoradiotherapy is recommended for patients with poorly differentiated tumors, lymphovascular invasion, neural invasion, or age <50 years 1
- This is a category 2B recommendation given limited evidence in this specific subgroup 1
Advanced Disease (T3-T4 or Any Node-Positive):
- Fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy (45-50.4 Gy) with concurrent 5-FU or capecitabine is the standard of care (Category 1 recommendation) 1
- This is based on the landmark INT-0116 trial showing improved median survival (36 vs 27 months) and 3-year overall survival (50% vs 41%) compared to surgery alone 1, 3
- The survival benefit persists beyond 10 years of follow-up 1
Positive Margins:
- R1 resection (microscopic residual): Fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy is recommended 1
- R2 resection (macroscopic residual): Chemoradiotherapy or palliative chemotherapy, depending on performance status 1
Critical Context: Quality of Surgery Matters
The benefit of post-operative radiotherapy is strongly influenced by the extent of lymph node dissection performed:
- In the INT-0116 trial, 54% of patients underwent inadequate (D0) lymphadenectomy and only 10% had D2 dissection 1
- Post-operative chemoradiotherapy appears to compensate for suboptimal surgery 1
- Retrospective data from the Dutch D1D2 trial suggests chemoradiotherapy reduces local recurrence after D1 resection but provides no benefit after optimal D2 resection 1
- However, other data suggest potential benefits even after D2 dissection, particularly in node-positive disease 1, 4
For patients who underwent optimal D2 lymphadenectomy:
- The role of post-operative radiotherapy remains controversial 1, 5
- Consider chemoradiotherapy for high N-stage disease (multiple positive nodes) even after D2 resection 5, 4
- Observation may be appropriate for lower-risk patients after D2 resection 1
Recommended Regimen (NOT the INT-0116 Protocol)
The original INT-0116 regimen (bolus 5-FU/leucovorin) is no longer recommended due to excessive toxicity (54% grade 3-4 hematologic, 33% grade 3-4 GI toxicity, 17% treatment discontinuation) 1
Current recommended approach:
- Fluoropyrimidine (infusional 5-FU or capecitabine) before and after concurrent chemoradiotherapy 1
- Radiation dose: 45-50.4 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions 1
- Concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based radiosensitization during radiation 1
Alternative: Perioperative Chemotherapy
For patients who received preoperative chemotherapy (e.g., MAGIC trial regimen with ECF):
- Complete the planned postoperative chemotherapy cycles (Category 1) 1
- This approach is widely adopted in Europe as an alternative to post-operative chemoradiotherapy 1
- Observation is also an option for node-negative disease after preoperative therapy 1
Special Considerations for Older Patients
Medical fitness is the key determinant, not chronologic age:
- Medically fit older patients should receive the same treatment as younger patients 1
- For medically unfit patients with unresectable disease, radiotherapy with concurrent 5-FU-based radiosensitization remains an option 1
- Best supportive care is appropriate for patients with poor performance status 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not use radiotherapy alone without chemotherapy - the standard is chemoradiotherapy, not radiotherapy alone 1, 3
- Do not use the original INT-0116 bolus 5-FU/leucovorin regimen - use infusional fluoropyrimidines instead to reduce toxicity 1
- Do not automatically apply post-operative chemoradiotherapy after optimal D2 resection - the benefit is less clear in this setting 1
- Whole abdominal irradiation is not superior to standard field radiotherapy and causes significantly more toxicity 6