What is the role of hydrocortisone (hydrocortisone) therapy in a patient with septic shock, particularly in relation to the CORTICUS (Corticosteroid Therapy of Septic Shock) trial and ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic Hormone) stimulation testing?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CORTICUS Trial and Hydrocortisone in Septic Shock

The CORTICUS trial failed to demonstrate mortality benefit from hydrocortisone in septic shock, and the ACTH stimulation test should not be used to guide treatment decisions—instead, reserve hydrocortisone 200 mg/day for patients with refractory shock unresponsive to adequate fluid resuscitation and moderate-to-high dose vasopressors. 1

Key Findings from CORTICUS

The CORTICUS trial fundamentally differed from earlier positive studies in its patient population and yielded negative results 1:

  • Enrolled patients with septic shock regardless of vasopressor responsiveness, unlike the French trial which only included patients with blood pressure unresponsive to vasopressors for >60 minutes 1
  • Baseline mortality was only 31% in CORTICUS versus 61% in the French trial, indicating a lower-risk population 1
  • No mortality benefit was observed with hydrocortisone therapy 1
  • ACTH stimulation testing did not predict shock resolution or identify patients who would benefit from steroids 1

Current Evidence-Based Recommendations

When to Use Hydrocortisone

Reserve hydrocortisone for refractory shock only 1, 2:

  • Use hydrocortisone 200 mg/day IV only if adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy fail to restore hemodynamic stability 1
  • Do not use hydrocortisone if blood pressure responds adequately to fluids and vasopressors 1
  • Do not use corticosteroids for sepsis without shock—no benefit demonstrated 1, 2

Dosing Protocol

When indicated, administer 1, 2:

  • Hydrocortisone 200 mg/day as either divided doses (50 mg IV every 6 hours) or continuous infusion 2
  • Continue for at least 3 days at full dose before considering taper 2
  • Taper gradually over 6-14 days when vasopressors are discontinued, rather than stopping abruptly 1, 2

Role of ACTH Stimulation Testing

Do not use the ACTH stimulation test to decide who receives hydrocortisone 1:

  • The CORTICUS trial showed similar hemodynamic response to steroids in both ACTH responders and non-responders 1
  • The interaction between steroid benefit and ACTH test results was not statistically significant 1
  • Clinical criteria should guide treatment decisions, not biochemical testing 1, 3

Recent High-Quality Evidence

Patient-Level Meta-Analysis (2023)

The most recent and comprehensive analysis pooled individual patient data from 17 trials (n=7,882) 4:

  • No mortality benefit with hydrocortisone alone: RR 0.93 (95% CI 0.82-1.04, P=0.22) 4
  • Hydrocortisone with fludrocortisone showed benefit: RR 0.86 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) 4
  • Increased vasopressor-free days by 1.24 days (95% CI 0.74-1.73) 4
  • Adverse effects: increased risk of hypernatremia (RR 2.01) and muscle weakness (RR 1.73) 4

APROCCHSS Trial (2018)

This high-quality French trial demonstrated mortality benefit with combination therapy 5:

  • Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone reduced 90-day mortality: 43.0% versus 49.1% (P=0.03) 5
  • Relative risk of death 0.88 (95% CI 0.78-0.99) 5
  • More vasopressor-free days (17 vs 15 days, P<0.001) 5

Network Meta-Analysis (2024)

The most recent systematic review comparing all regimens 6:

  • Fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone superior to placebo: RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-0.99) 6
  • Fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone likely superior to hydrocortisone alone: RR 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.03,94.2% probability of superiority) 6
  • Hydrocortisone alone showed no significant benefit: RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.87-1.07) 6

Clinical Algorithm

Step 1: Patient has septic shock requiring vasopressors 1

Step 2: Optimize fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy first 1

Step 3: If hemodynamic stability achieved → Do not use hydrocortisone 1

Step 4: If shock remains refractory despite adequate fluids and moderate-to-high dose vasopressors → Consider hydrocortisone 200 mg/day 1, 2

Step 5: Add fludrocortisone 50 mcg daily for maximum mortality benefit based on recent evidence 5, 6

Step 6: Continue full dose for at least 3-5 days 2

Step 7: When vasopressors discontinued → Taper over 6-14 days 1, 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not perform ACTH stimulation testing to guide hydrocortisone decisions—it has no predictive value 1
  • Avoid etomidate for intubation if possible—associated with increased mortality when followed by steroids 1
  • Never stop steroids abruptly—causes hemodynamic and immunologic rebound 1, 2
  • Do not use steroids in sepsis without shock—no benefit and potential harm 1, 2
  • Monitor for hyperglycemia and hypernatremia during treatment 4

Reconciling Contradictory Evidence

The divergence between CORTICUS and earlier trials reflects patient selection 1:

  • High-risk patients (mortality >60%, vasopressor-unresponsive shock) may benefit from steroids 1
  • Lower-risk patients (mortality <50%, responsive to vasopressors) show no benefit 1
  • Fludrocortisone addition appears critical for mortality benefit based on most recent evidence 4, 5, 6

The 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines appropriately incorporated CORTICUS findings by recommending steroids only for refractory shock 1, and recent evidence suggests adding fludrocortisone when steroids are indicated 5, 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency (CIRCI)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency (CIRCI) in Critically Ill Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock.

The New England journal of medicine, 2018

Related Questions

What is the difference between fludrocortisone and hydrocortisone?
What is the current evidence for using fludrocortisone in patients with septic shock?
When are corticosteroids indicated in septic (systemic inflammatory response syndrome due to infection) shock?
What is the most important medication to administer to a 30-year-old female patient with a history of ulcerative colitis (UC) and adrenal disease, currently experiencing septic shock, hypotension, hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, hyperkalemia, acute renal injury, non-anion gap metabolic acidosis, and eosinophilia, who is taking cortisone treatment?
What should be administered next to a patient with stage IV lung cancer, severe fatigue, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, weight loss, hypotension, mild dyspnea, and laboratory findings of anemia (low Hemoglobin), hyponatremia, and hyperkalemia, in addition to fluid resuscitation?
Can a postpartum patient with giant condyloma acuminata be treated in a primary health care setting?
What is the appropriate workup and treatment for a patient presenting with hypercalcemia?
Can a patient with a positive sputum GeneXpert (Xpert MTB/RIF) result and close contact with someone who has rifampicin (RIF)-resistant tuberculosis (TB) be treated with an extensively drug-resistant (XDR) regimen?
What is the best course of treatment for a 40-year-old male with a history of hypertension, presenting with vomiting, generalized body swelling, decreased urine output, and reddish discoloration of urine, diagnosed with Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis (RPGN) and severe impaired renal function, with lab results showing hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, hyperphosphatemia, and hypocalcemia?
What could be causing my frequent heart palpitations?
What is the next step in management for a patient with early-stage, grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma, with KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) and PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) mutations, and wild-type TP53 (tumor protein p53), MLH1 (mutL homolog 1), MSH2 (mutS homolog 2), MSH6 (mutS homolog 6), and POLE (DNA polymerase epsilon), after standard surgery?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.