What is the next step in management for a patient with early-stage, grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma, with KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) and PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) mutations, and wild-type TP53 (tumor protein p53), MLH1 (mutL homolog 1), MSH2 (mutS homolog 2), MSH6 (mutS homolog 6), and POLE (DNA polymerase epsilon), after standard surgery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Early-Stage Grade 1 Endometrial Adenocarcinoma with KRAS/PTEN Mutations and Wild-Type TP53, MMR, and POLE

For this patient with early-stage, grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma showing KRAS and PTEN mutations with wild-type TP53, MMR proteins, and POLE, the molecular profile classifies this as "No Specific Molecular Profile" (NSMP) subtype, which carries intermediate prognosis and requires risk-stratified adjuvant therapy based on stage, depth of myometrial invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) status. 1, 2

Molecular Classification and Prognostic Implications

Your NGS results place this tumor in the NSMP molecular subgroup, which represents 30-40% of endometrial cancers and has intermediate prognosis 2. This classification is determined by:

  • Absence of POLE hotspot mutations (ultramutated subgroup excluded - these have excellent prognosis) 1, 2
  • Intact MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 wild-type, excluding microsatellite unstable subgroup) 1, 2
  • Wild-type TP53 (excluding p53-aberrant subgroup with poor prognosis) 1, 2
  • KRAS and PTEN mutations are characteristic molecular alterations of type I endometrioid adenocarcinomas and consistent with NSMP classification 1

Risk Stratification Algorithm

The next critical step is determining the specific risk category within NSMP tumors, which depends on:

Stage IA, Grade 1 Disease with No/Focal LVSI

  • Classified as LOW RISK 1
  • Observation alone is the standard of care - no adjuvant therapy indicated 1
  • Multiple studies demonstrate no survival benefit from adjuvant treatment in this group 1

Stage IA, Grade 1 Disease with Age ≥60 Years and/or LVSI Present

  • Vaginal brachytherapy is preferred 1
  • Observation can be considered if no additional risk factors 1

Stage IB, Grade 1 Disease with No Adverse Risk Factors

  • Vaginal brachytherapy is preferred 1
  • Observation can be considered if truly no adverse features 1

Stage IB, Grade 1 Disease with Age ≥60 Years and/or LVSI

  • External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) can be considered as category 2B option 1
  • Vaginal brachytherapy remains an option 1

Essential Clinical Information Still Needed

To finalize the treatment recommendation, you must determine:

  1. Exact FIGO stage (IA vs IB based on depth of myometrial invasion: <50% vs ≥50%) 1
  2. LVSI status (absent, focal, or substantial) - this is a critical determinant 1
  3. Patient age (particularly whether ≥60 years) 1
  4. Completeness of surgical staging (whether lymphadenectomy was performed) 1
  5. Lower uterine segment or cervical involvement 1

Treatment Initiation Timing

  • Adjuvant radiotherapy, if indicated, should begin once the vaginal cuff has healed but no later than 12 weeks after surgery 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume low-grade histology alone determines low risk - myometrial invasion depth and LVSI status are equally important for NSMP tumors 1
  • Do not overlook the importance of expert pathology review - 31% of cases initially diagnosed as low-grade may be reclassified on expert review 3
  • Do not provide adjuvant therapy to true stage IA, grade 1 NSMP patients without LVSI - this represents overtreatment with no survival benefit 1
  • Recognize that KRAS/PTEN mutations without TP53 abnormality do NOT confer high-risk status - these are expected molecular alterations in endometrioid carcinomas 1, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Molecular Classification of Endometrial Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Clinical Behavior and Molecular Landscape of Stage I p53-Abnormal Low-Grade Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinomas.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.