What are the modified Dukes criteria for diagnosing infective endocarditis and what is the recommended treatment approach?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Modified Duke Criteria for Infective Endocarditis

The modified Duke criteria remain the gold standard diagnostic framework for infective endocarditis, requiring either 2 major criteria, 1 major plus 3 minor criteria, or 5 minor criteria for a definite diagnosis, with echocardiography and blood cultures serving as the cornerstone of diagnosis. 1, 2

Diagnostic Categories

The modified Duke criteria classify patients into three categories 1, 2:

  • Definite IE: Requires pathological criteria (microorganisms on culture/histology from vegetation, embolized vegetation, or intracardiac abscess) OR clinical criteria (2 major criteria, OR 1 major + 3 minor criteria, OR 5 minor criteria) 1, 2
  • Possible IE: Requires 1 major + 1 minor criterion, OR 3 minor criteria 2, 3
  • Rejected IE: Firm alternative diagnosis, resolution with ≤4 days of antibiotics, no pathological evidence at surgery/autopsy after ≤4 days of antibiotics, or fails to meet possible IE criteria 1, 3

Major Criteria

Microbiological Major Criteria

Blood culture positivity constitutes a major criterion under three specific circumstances 1, 2:

  • Typical microorganisms from ≥2 separate blood cultures: Viridans streptococci, Streptococcus bovis, HACEK group organisms, Staphylococcus aureus (regardless of nosocomial or community acquisition—this is a critical modification from original criteria), or community-acquired enterococci without a primary focus 1, 3

  • Persistently positive blood cultures: ≥2 positive cultures drawn >12 hours apart, OR all of 3 cultures, OR majority of ≥4 separate cultures (with first and last drawn ≥1 hour apart) 1, 2

  • Single positive blood culture for Coxiella burnetii OR anti-phase I IgG antibody titer >1:800 1, 3

Echocardiographic Major Criteria

Positive echocardiogram findings include 1, 2:

  • Oscillating intracardiac mass on valve or supporting structures, in the path of regurgitant jets, or on implanted material (without alternative anatomic explanation) 1, 3
  • Abscess (periannular or intracardiac) 1, 3
  • New partial dehiscence of prosthetic valve 1, 3
  • New valvular regurgitation (worsening or changing of preexisting murmur is NOT sufficient) 1, 3

Minor Criteria

Five minor criteria exist 1, 2:

  • Predisposition: Predisposing heart condition (mitral valve prolapse, prior IE, bicuspid aortic valve, valve stenosis/insufficiency) OR injection drug use 1, 3
  • Fever: Temperature ≥38.0°C 1, 3
  • Vascular phenomena: Major arterial emboli, septic pulmonary infarcts, mycotic aneurysm, intracranial hemorrhage, conjunctival hemorrhages, Janeway lesions 1, 3
  • Immunologic phenomena: Glomerulonephritis, Osler nodes, Roth spots, rheumatoid factor 1, 3
  • Microbiological evidence: Positive blood culture not meeting major criterion OR serological evidence of active infection with organism consistent with IE 1, 3

Diagnostic Approach Algorithm

Follow this stepwise approach when IE is suspected 1:

  1. Obtain ≥3 sets of blood cultures from separate venipunctures with first and last samples drawn ≥1 hour apart BEFORE initiating antibiotics 1, 3

  2. Perform transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) initially in all suspected cases 1

  3. Proceed to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) if:

    • TTE is nondiagnostic 1
    • Prosthetic valves present 1
    • Intracardiac leads/devices present 1
    • High clinical suspicion despite negative TTE 1
    • Complications suspected (abscess, dehiscence) 1
    • S. aureus, enterococcal, or fungal infection 1
  4. Apply modified Duke criteria to classify as definite, possible, or rejected 1, 2

Diagnostic Performance

The modified Duke criteria demonstrate 80% sensitivity with high specificity across diverse patient populations including adults, pediatrics, injection drug users, and patients with native or prosthetic valves 2, 4. This represents a significant improvement over the older von Reyn criteria, which had only 30-60% sensitivity 5.

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Premature antibiotic administration is the most common cause of culture-negative endocarditis 3, 6. In one study, 63% of patients received antibiotics before blood cultures were obtained, resulting in 71% culture-negative cases 6.

Do not dismiss nosocomial S. aureus bacteremia—the modified criteria now include ANY S. aureus bacteremia (nosocomial or community-acquired) as a major criterion, as 13-46% of nosocomial cases develop IE 1, 3.

TTE has limited sensitivity for prosthetic valve vegetations (≈50%), prosthetic valve abscess (30-50%), and cardiac device lead infections (25-40%)—proceed directly to TEE in these high-risk scenarios 1.

Repeat echocardiography if initial studies are negative but clinical suspicion remains high—perivalvular abscesses may appear initially as nonspecific thickening and only become recognizable as they expand and cavitate over days 1.

The Duke criteria are a guide, not a replacement for clinical judgment—clinicians may appropriately treat patients who fail to meet criteria if clinical suspicion is high, particularly in culture-negative cases with high pretest probability 1.

Treatment Approach

Initiate empirical antibiotic therapy immediately in high-risk scenarios including injection drug use, prosthetic valves, previous IE, or S. aureus catheter-related bloodstream infections, even before blood culture results are available 1. The diagnosis must be made as rapidly as possible to initiate appropriate therapy and identify high-risk patients who may benefit from early surgical intervention 1.

Management requires a multidisciplinary Heart Valve Team with expertise in infectious diseases, cardiology, and cardiac surgery 1, 7.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria for Infective Endocarditis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria for Infective Endocarditis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Infective endocarditis.

Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.