What are the guidelines for patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in a patient with a history of embolic stroke?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 23, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Guidelines for PFO Closure in Embolic Stroke

For carefully-selected patients aged 18-60 years with cryptogenic embolic stroke attributed to PFO, PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is strongly recommended over antiplatelet therapy alone. 1

Patient Selection Criteria

All of the following criteria must be met before recommending PFO closure: 1

  • Age 18-60 years (benefits uncertain and likely smaller in patients >60 years due to fewer cryptogenic strokes caused by paradoxical emboli) 1
  • Confirmed embolic stroke on imaging - specifically a non-lacunar embolic ischemic stroke or TIA with positive neuroimaging or cortical symptoms 1
  • Thorough etiological evaluation completed to exclude alternative stroke mechanisms including:
    • Prolonged rhythm monitoring to exclude atrial fibrillation 1
    • Transoesophageal echocardiography or alternative imaging of aorta and left atrial appendage to rule out atherothrombosis or left atrial clot 1
    • Carotid ultrasonography, CT, or MRI to rule out cerebrovascular disease 1
  • PFO determined to be the most likely cause by a neurologist or clinician with stroke expertise 1
  • Evaluation by multidisciplinary team with both stroke and cardiovascular expertise 1

Treatment Algorithm

When All Options Are Acceptable:

PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is recommended over anticoagulation therapy (weak recommendation), as most patients prefer avoiding long-term bleeding risk from anticoagulation over the relatively small procedural risks. 1

When Anticoagulation is Contraindicated or Declined:

PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is strongly recommended over antiplatelet therapy alone (strong recommendation), with high-quality evidence showing substantial stroke reduction benefit. 1

When PFO Closure is Contraindicated or Declined:

Either antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is recommended for patients aged ≤60 years, unless there is a separate evidence-based indication for chronic anticoagulation. 1, 2 The American Heart Association recommends antiplatelet therapy as the primary option, with anticoagulation reserved for specific high-risk scenarios. 2

Expected Benefits and Risks

Benefits of PFO Closure:

  • Absolute recurrent stroke risk reduction of 3.4% at 5 years 3
  • Relative risk reduction of recurrent stroke: 46-100% 4
  • Annualized absolute stroke reduction: 0.49-1.32% per year 4
  • Number needed to treat: 18-44 patients to prevent one stroke recurrence over 2-10 years 5

Risks of PFO Closure:

  • Periprocedural complication rate: 3.9% (serious but infrequent) 3
  • Increased atrial fibrillation risk: 0.33% per year (non-periprocedural) 3
  • Procedure duration: under 2 hours with 1-day hospital stay and full recovery within weeks 1

Special Populations and Contraindications

Higher Risk Patients (Consider Medical Therapy Instead):

  • Patients with identified higher-risk alternative stroke mechanism should not routinely undergo PFO closure 3
  • Patients with small deep (lacunar) infarcts may have little or no benefit 6
  • Patients with small PFO without atrial septal aneurysm may have minimal benefit 6
  • Patients requiring long-term anticoagulation for other indications - decision remains unclear and should be based on individual risk-benefit profile 1

Patients Who Benefit Most:

  • Embolic-appearing strokes 3
  • Large right-to-left shunt 6
  • Associated atrial septal aneurysm 6
  • High RoPE (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism) score >8 with at least one clinical risk factor 1, 7

Post-Closure Management

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 1-3 months, followed by single antiplatelet therapy for 6 months is recommended, though antiplatelet therapy may be continued indefinitely or discontinued after this period. 1, 7

Critical Caveats

  • PFO is present in approximately 25% of the general population and may be an incidental finding rather than the stroke cause 1, 6, 3
  • Certainty of causation is impossible to determine - clinicians must counsel patients that it is difficult to establish with certainty whether the PFO caused their stroke 1, 3
  • Timing of closure should be as early as possible after stroke, as evidence for late closure is limited 7
  • Patients with evidence of deep vein thrombosis or venous thromboembolism require anticoagulation regardless of PFO status 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.