Guidelines for PFO Closure in Embolic Stroke
For carefully-selected patients aged 18-60 years with cryptogenic embolic stroke attributed to PFO, PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is strongly recommended over antiplatelet therapy alone. 1
Patient Selection Criteria
All of the following criteria must be met before recommending PFO closure: 1
- Age 18-60 years (benefits uncertain and likely smaller in patients >60 years due to fewer cryptogenic strokes caused by paradoxical emboli) 1
- Confirmed embolic stroke on imaging - specifically a non-lacunar embolic ischemic stroke or TIA with positive neuroimaging or cortical symptoms 1
- Thorough etiological evaluation completed to exclude alternative stroke mechanisms including:
- PFO determined to be the most likely cause by a neurologist or clinician with stroke expertise 1
- Evaluation by multidisciplinary team with both stroke and cardiovascular expertise 1
Treatment Algorithm
When All Options Are Acceptable:
PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is recommended over anticoagulation therapy (weak recommendation), as most patients prefer avoiding long-term bleeding risk from anticoagulation over the relatively small procedural risks. 1
When Anticoagulation is Contraindicated or Declined:
PFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is strongly recommended over antiplatelet therapy alone (strong recommendation), with high-quality evidence showing substantial stroke reduction benefit. 1
When PFO Closure is Contraindicated or Declined:
Either antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is recommended for patients aged ≤60 years, unless there is a separate evidence-based indication for chronic anticoagulation. 1, 2 The American Heart Association recommends antiplatelet therapy as the primary option, with anticoagulation reserved for specific high-risk scenarios. 2
Expected Benefits and Risks
Benefits of PFO Closure:
- Absolute recurrent stroke risk reduction of 3.4% at 5 years 3
- Relative risk reduction of recurrent stroke: 46-100% 4
- Annualized absolute stroke reduction: 0.49-1.32% per year 4
- Number needed to treat: 18-44 patients to prevent one stroke recurrence over 2-10 years 5
Risks of PFO Closure:
- Periprocedural complication rate: 3.9% (serious but infrequent) 3
- Increased atrial fibrillation risk: 0.33% per year (non-periprocedural) 3
- Procedure duration: under 2 hours with 1-day hospital stay and full recovery within weeks 1
Special Populations and Contraindications
Higher Risk Patients (Consider Medical Therapy Instead):
- Patients with identified higher-risk alternative stroke mechanism should not routinely undergo PFO closure 3
- Patients with small deep (lacunar) infarcts may have little or no benefit 6
- Patients with small PFO without atrial septal aneurysm may have minimal benefit 6
- Patients requiring long-term anticoagulation for other indications - decision remains unclear and should be based on individual risk-benefit profile 1
Patients Who Benefit Most:
- Embolic-appearing strokes 3
- Large right-to-left shunt 6
- Associated atrial septal aneurysm 6
- High RoPE (Risk of Paradoxical Embolism) score >8 with at least one clinical risk factor 1, 7
Post-Closure Management
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 1-3 months, followed by single antiplatelet therapy for 6 months is recommended, though antiplatelet therapy may be continued indefinitely or discontinued after this period. 1, 7
Critical Caveats
- PFO is present in approximately 25% of the general population and may be an incidental finding rather than the stroke cause 1, 6, 3
- Certainty of causation is impossible to determine - clinicians must counsel patients that it is difficult to establish with certainty whether the PFO caused their stroke 1, 3
- Timing of closure should be as early as possible after stroke, as evidence for late closure is limited 7
- Patients with evidence of deep vein thrombosis or venous thromboembolism require anticoagulation regardless of PFO status 1