How to Stratify Breast Cancer Risk
Breast cancer risk stratification divides women into three categories based on estimated lifetime risk: average risk (<15%), intermediate risk (15-20%), and high risk (>20-25%), using validated risk assessment models, family history evaluation, genetic testing results, and personal clinical factors. 1
Risk Category Definitions
Average Risk (<15% Lifetime Risk)
- No significant family history of breast or ovarian cancer 1
- No known genetic mutations 1
- No history of thoracic radiation before age 30 1
- No personal history of high-risk breast lesions (atypical hyperplasia, LCIS) 1
- Less than 1.7% five-year risk by Gail model 1
Intermediate Risk (15-20% Lifetime Risk)
- One first-degree relative with breast cancer, particularly if diagnosed after age 50 1, 2
- Dense breast tissue on mammography 1
- Personal history of atypical hyperplasia or LCIS (requires specialized risk models, not Gail) 1, 3
- Calculated 15-20% lifetime risk using Tyrer-Cuzick or similar models 1
High Risk (>20-25% Lifetime Risk)
- Known BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, or PTEN mutation carriers 1
- Untested first-degree relatives of mutation carriers 1
- Thoracic radiation therapy before age 30 (e.g., mantle radiation for Hodgkin disease) 1
- Personal history of breast cancer 3
- Two or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer, especially if diagnosed before age 50 1, 2
- Male breast cancer in the family 1, 2
- Family history of both breast and ovarian cancer 1, 2
- Ashkenazi Jewish heritage with any affected relative 2, 4
Risk Assessment Tools and When to Use Them
Gail Model
- Use for: Average-risk women aged ≥35 years without strong family history 1
- Incorporates: Age, race, age at menarche, age at first live birth, number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer, number of previous breast biopsies, atypical hyperplasia 1
- Threshold for intervention: ≥1.7% five-year risk qualifies for chemoprevention consideration 1, 4
- Critical limitation: Systematically underestimates risk in women with strong family history, personal history of atypical hyperplasia/LCIS, or multiple affected relatives 1, 3, 5
- Do NOT use for: Women with BRCA mutations, thoracic radiation history, LCIS, or strong family history 1, 3
Tyrer-Cuzick Model
- Use for: Women with significant family history or personal history of high-risk lesions 3, 6
- Incorporates: First- and second-degree relatives on both maternal and paternal sides, age at diagnosis, breast density 1, 6
- Superior to Gail when: Family history is the primary concern or multiple relatives are affected 2, 3
BRCAPRO and BOADICEA Models
- Use for: Estimating probability of carrying BRCA mutations 1, 6
- BOADICEA also provides: Breast cancer risk estimates 1
- Indicated when: Multiple affected relatives, early-onset cancers, or ovarian cancer in family 1
Claus Model
- Use for: White women with 1-2 first- or second-degree female relatives with breast cancer 1
- Limitation: Does not incorporate non-family history risk factors 1
Genetic Testing Criteria
Refer for Genetic Counseling When:
- Two or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer 1, 2
- Breast cancer diagnosed before age 50 in a close relative 1
- Family history of both breast and ovarian cancer 1, 2
- Male breast cancer in the family 1, 2
- Bilateral breast cancer in a relative 1
- Ashkenazi Jewish heritage with any affected relative 1, 2
- Personal history of breast cancer diagnosed ≤45 years 2
- Personal history of ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer 2
- Three or more affected relatives on the same side of the family 6
BRCA Mutation Carriers
- BRCA1: 65% risk by age 70 (population-based studies); up to 85-90% in high-risk families 1
- BRCA2: 45% risk by age 70 (population-based studies); up to 85-90% in high-risk families 1
- After age 60: Annual invasive breast cancer rate remains 1.7-1.8%, with cumulative risk of 17-20% from age 60-80 7
Additional Risk Factors to Assess
Personal History Factors
- Previous breast cancer: Confers 0.5-1% annual risk (5-10% cumulative over 10 years), representing 2-6 fold increased risk versus general population 3
- Atypical hyperplasia or LCIS: Requires Tyrer-Cuzick model, not Gail 1, 3
- Dense breast tissue: Independent risk factor, though not included in most models 1
Hormonal and Reproductive Factors
- Age at menarche (earlier = higher risk) 1
- Age at first live birth (later = higher risk) 1
- Nulliparity 1
- Hormone replacement therapy use 1
Radiation Exposure
- Thoracic radiation before age 30: 56.7-fold increased risk; qualifies as high-risk regardless of other factors 1
- Common scenario: Mantle radiation for Hodgkin disease 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Family History Assessment Errors
- Ignoring paternal family history: BRCA mutations transmit equally through both parents 2, 6
- Not accounting for small family size: Limited family structure may underestimate hereditary risk 2
- Failing to reassess periodically: New cancer diagnoses in family change risk status 2, 6
- Overlooking ethnic background: Ashkenazi Jewish, Icelandic, Swedish, Hungarian, and Dutch populations have higher BRCA prevalence 1, 2
Model Selection Errors
- Using Gail model for strong family history: Will systematically underestimate risk 1, 3, 5
- Not using specialized models for mutation probability: BRCAPRO or BOADICEA needed when hereditary syndrome suspected 1, 6
- Applying models to recent immigrants: Gail model may overestimate risk in recent immigrants from Japan or China 1
Risk Threshold Misunderstandings
- Age-specific thresholds matter: A 40-year-old with 1.67% five-year risk qualifies for chemoprevention consideration 4
- Lifetime risk >20% triggers high-risk management: Annual MRI plus mammography starting age 25-30 1, 3
- Personal history trumps family history alone: Personal history of breast cancer represents higher absolute annual risk than family history alone 3