Alternative to Mesalamine for Ulcerative Colitis
For patients failing or intolerant to mesalamine, escalate to oral corticosteroids (prednisone 40 mg daily or budesonide MMX 9 mg daily) as the next step, then advance to immunomodulators or biologics for steroid-dependent or refractory disease. 1
Immediate Alternatives for Mesalamine Intolerance
Switch to Alternative 5-ASA Formulations First
- Balsalazide (6.75 g daily) is better tolerated than mesalamine and may be tried in patients with mesalamine intolerance, as it has similar efficacy for induction and superior efficacy for maintenance of remission 1
- Sulfasalazine (2-4 g daily) can be considered if cost is prohibitive or if the patient has prominent arthritic symptoms, though it has a higher side effect profile (up to 20% intolerance rate) requiring folate supplementation and laboratory monitoring 1
- Approximately 85% of patients intolerant to sulfasalazine will tolerate mesalamine, but the reverse is also true—some patients intolerant to mesalamine may tolerate sulfasalazine 2
Escalation for Inadequate Response to Optimized 5-ASA
Corticosteroids (Second-Line)
- Oral prednisone 40 mg daily should be initiated if there is inadequate response after 10-14 days of rectal bleeding or 40 days without complete remission on optimized mesalamine therapy (high-dose oral plus rectal) 1, 3
- Budesonide MMX 9 mg daily is an alternative with fewer systemic side effects than prednisone, though the evidence comparing efficacy is limited 1, 4
- Taper corticosteroids gradually over 8 weeks to avoid adrenal insufficiency 1, 4
- Topical corticosteroids (rectal) are less effective than topical mesalamine and should be reserved for patients intolerant of rectal mesalamine 1
Immunomodulators (Third-Line for Steroid-Dependent Disease)
- Azathioprine 1.5-2.5 mg/kg/day or mercaptopurine 0.75-1.5 mg/kg/day are effective for steroid-dependent disease and long-term maintenance of remission 3, 4, 5
- These agents reduce the need for corticosteroids and clinical relapses in chronically active or corticosteroid-dependent disease 5
Biologics (Third-Line for Moderate-Severe or Refractory Disease)
- TNF-α antagonists (infliximab 5 mg/kg IV at weeks 0,2,6, then every 8 weeks) are appropriate for patients who value efficacy over the safety profile of 5-ASA 4
- Vedolizumab (integrin antagonist) and ustekinumab (IL-12/23 antagonist) are alternative biologic agents 4
- Early use of biologics rather than gradual step-up is suggested for patients prioritizing efficacy 4
Algorithm for Treatment Escalation
Step 1: Optimize 5-ASA Therapy
- Ensure adequate dosing: standard-dose mesalamine (2-3 g/day) or high-dose (4.8 g/day) for moderate disease 1
- Add rectal mesalamine (≥1 g/day) to oral therapy for extensive or left-sided disease 1
- If intolerant, switch to balsalazide 6.75 g daily 1
Step 2: Add Corticosteroids
- If no response after 10-14 days of rectal bleeding or 40 days total, add prednisone 40 mg daily or budesonide MMX 9 mg daily 1, 3
- Taper over 8 weeks once remission achieved 1
Step 3: Immunomodulators or Biologics
- For steroid-dependent disease (requiring ≥1 course/year): azathioprine or mercaptopurine 3, 4
- For steroid-refractory disease or moderate-severe disease: biologics (infliximab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab) 4
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not delay escalation beyond 40 days without improvement on optimized 5-ASA therapy, as this risks disease progression and complications 3
- Do not use low-dose mesalamine (<2 g/day) as it is significantly less effective than standard doses 1, 3
- Do not use oral mesalamine alone for distal disease—combined oral and rectal therapy is superior 1
- Do not continue long-term corticosteroids for maintenance—they are ineffective and hazardous for this purpose 5
- Monitor renal function periodically on all 5-ASA agents due to rare risk of interstitial nephritis 3, 6
Special Considerations
- Cyclosporin may be useful as rescue therapy for acutely severe disease not responding to intensive intravenous corticosteroids after 3-5 days 4, 5
- Probiotics, curcumin, and FMT are not recommended due to insufficient evidence and risk of delaying proven effective therapy 1
- Lifelong maintenance therapy is recommended for all patients with extensive or left-sided disease, and those with distal disease relapsing more than once yearly 1