TEVAR Without Covered Stent to Branch: Outcomes and Management
Direct Answer
When performing TEVAR without using a covered stent to preserve branch vessel flow (such as the left subclavian artery or celiac artery), outcomes are significantly worse, with increased rates of spinal cord injury, stroke, and visceral ischemia—therefore, branch vessel revascularization or preservation is strongly recommended before or during TEVAR to prevent devastating complications. 1, 2
Branch Vessel Coverage Without Revascularization: Critical Outcomes
Left Subclavian Artery Coverage Without Revascularization
Covering the left subclavian artery without revascularization substantially increases the risk of spinal cord injury and stroke. 1
Preoperative left subclavian artery revascularization is a Class I recommendation (highest level) before TEVAR when coverage is planned, specifically to prevent spinal cord injury and reduce stroke risk. 1
Up to 40% of TEVAR cases for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms require left subclavian artery coverage, making this a common clinical scenario. 1
Patients who undergo left subclavian coverage without revascularization face multiple ischemic complications: vertebrobasilar insufficiency (particularly with dominant left vertebral artery), left upper extremity ischemia, and compromise of existing left internal mammary artery coronary bypass grafts or dialysis access. 1
The mechanism of spinal cord injury relates to loss of collateral blood supply to the anterior spinal artery, which depends on vertebral and subclavian contributions when extensive aortic coverage is performed. 2
Celiac Artery Coverage Without Adequate Collateralization
Covering the celiac artery without confirming adequate collateral flow carries risk of fatal visceral ischemia. 1
Celiac artery coverage is necessary in approximately 15% of TEVAR cases for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. 1
It is reasonable (Class IIa recommendation) to confirm adequate collateralization between the celiac and superior mesenteric artery before intentional celiac coverage using CTA or angiography. 1
Despite preoperative confirmation of collaterals, a small percentage of patients still develop visceral ischemia and death. 1
Late distal stent graft migration can cause superior mesenteric artery stenosis, compromising flow through both the SMA and celiac-based collaterals, leading to delayed visceral ischemia. 1
High-Risk Features Requiring Prophylactic Measures
Spinal Cord Ischemia Prevention
Prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage via lumbar drain is recommended for patients at high risk of spinal cord ischemic injury. 2
High-risk criteria include: 2
- Extensive aortic coverage (>15 cm)
- Prior aortic surgery
- Planned left subclavian artery coverage without revascularization
- Involvement of critical collateral vessels
The target CSF pressure should be maintained at <10 mmHg while optimizing mean arterial pressure to maintain adequate spinal cord perfusion pressure. 2
Surveillance and Complication Detection
Mandatory Post-TEVAR Imaging Protocol
CT surveillance is required at 1 month and 12 months after TEVAR, then annually for life if stable. 1
This surveillance detects endoleaks (most common complication), stent graft migration, stent fracture or collapse, retrograde type A dissection, and progressive aortic dilation. 1, 3
Endoleak rates after TEVAR are substantial: 11% at 30 days, 6% at 1 year, and 9% at 2 years. 1
MRI is a reasonable alternative to CT for reducing long-term radiation exposure or avoiding iodinated contrast in allergic patients. 1
Reintervention Rates
TEVAR is associated with reintervention rates ranging from 7% to 23%, substantially higher than open repair. 1
Treatment failure requiring reintervention occurs in 1-7% of open repairs at 10-year follow-up, compared to significantly higher rates with TEVAR. 1
Type II endoleaks related to uncovered branch vessels (left subclavian, aberrant subclavian) are common, with 19% of patients requiring reintervention at median 7 months in one series. 4
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Inadequate Preoperative Planning
Fine-cut CTA (≤0.25 mm) of the entire aorta, iliac/femoral arteries, and head/neck vessels is mandatory for accurate case planning when TEVAR is considered. 5
Three-dimensional centerline reconstruction software should be routinely used for accurate case planning and execution. 5
Increased aortic tortuosity in the proximal landing zone significantly increases endoleak risk, particularly type III endoleaks. 1
Bird-beak configuration (gap between stent graft and aortic wall at the lesser curvature) is associated with higher risk of type Ia endoleak and occurs with highly angulated or curved aortic arch anatomy. 1
Delayed Recognition of Spinal Cord Ischemia
If spinal cord injury develops after TEVAR with left subclavian coverage, secondary revascularization of the left subclavian artery may reverse the injury (Class IIb recommendation), though this is a salvage measure with uncertain efficacy. 1
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable may not be candidates for preemptive revascularization, but case reports suggest benefit from delayed revascularization if spinal cord injury develops. 1
Underestimating Long-Term Surveillance Needs
Lifelong annual surveillance is required because complications can develop years after the initial procedure. 1
Late stent graft migration can cause new branch vessel compromise even when initial coverage was avoided. 1
Progressive aneurysmal dilation of adjacent or remote aortic segments occurs after both TEVAR and open repair. 1
Specific Anatomic Considerations
Proximal Landing Zone Requirements
When the landing zone is adjacent to or overlapping with the left subclavian artery takeoff, embolization or bypass must be considered. 1
- The left subclavian artery should be revascularized before TEVAR to preserve collateral flow to the spinal cord and reduce the need for prophylactic CSF drainage. 2
Iliofemoral Access Assessment
Assessment of iliofemoral artery diameters, calcification extent, and tortuosity is critical for TEVAR planning. 1
- Imaging should extend to the abdomen and pelvis to evaluate access vessels, not just the thoracic aorta. 1