CT Perfusion Criteria for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Stroke
For patients presenting within 0-6 hours of symptom onset, CT perfusion is not required for thrombectomy decision-making—noncontrast CT with ASPECTS ≥6 plus CTA confirming large vessel occlusion is sufficient, whereas patients presenting 6-24 hours from last known well must have CT perfusion or DW-MRI demonstrating salvageable tissue with strict adherence to DAWN or DEFUSE-3 mismatch criteria. 1, 2
Early Window (0-6 Hours): Basic Imaging Criteria
Within 6 hours, proceed with thrombectomy based on noncontrast CT and CTA alone without perfusion imaging. 2
Required criteria for thrombectomy in the early window include:
- Age ≥18 years 3
- Pre-stroke mRS 0-1 (functionally independent) 1, 3
- NIHSS ≥6 (moderate to severe deficit) 1, 3
- ASPECTS ≥6 on noncontrast CT (limited established infarction) 1, 3
- Causative occlusion of ICA or MCA-M1 confirmed on CTA 1, 3
- Treatment initiation (groin puncture) within 6 hours of symptom onset or last known well 3
The American College of Radiology explicitly states that CTP is unnecessary in this time window when these criteria are met. 2
Extended Window (6-24 Hours): Mandatory Perfusion Imaging
Beyond 6 hours, advanced perfusion imaging becomes mandatory to demonstrate salvageable brain tissue. 1, 2
DEFUSE-3 Criteria (6-16 Hours)
For patients 6-16 hours from last known well, the American Heart Association gives a Class I, Level A recommendation for thrombectomy when meeting DEFUSE-3 criteria: 1
- Core infarct volume <70 mL (measured as CBF <30% on CTP or DWI lesion on MRI) 1
- Mismatch ratio >1.8 (ratio of hypoperfusion volume to core volume) 1
- Absolute mismatch volume >15 mL 1
- Anterior circulation LVO (ICA or MCA-M1) 1
The DEFUSE-3 trial demonstrated 44.6% versus 16.7% achieved good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) with thrombectomy versus control (RR 2.67,95% CI 1.60-4.48, P<0.0001). 1
DAWN Criteria (6-24 Hours)
For patients 6-24 hours from last known well, the American Heart Association provides Class I (6-16h) or Class IIa (16-24h) recommendations using DAWN clinical-imaging mismatch criteria: 1
Age 80 years or older:
- NIHSS ≥10
- Core volume <21 mL 1
Age <80 years:
- NIHSS ≥10 and core <31 mL, OR
- NIHSS ≥20 and core <51 mL 1
The DAWN trial showed 49% versus 13% achieved good functional outcome with thrombectomy versus control (adjusted difference 33%, 95% CI 21-44). 1
Critical guideline statement: Only DAWN or DEFUSE-3 eligibility criteria should be used for patient selection beyond 6 hours—these are the only RCTs demonstrating benefit in this window, and strict adherence is mandatory in clinical practice. 1
Blood Pressure Requirements
Patients eligible for IV thrombolysis who will undergo thrombectomy must have blood pressure lowered below 185/110 mmHg before alteplase is initiated. 1
Hypotension and hypovolemia should be corrected to maintain systemic perfusion necessary to support organ function. 1
Technical and Procedural Considerations
Imaging Acquisition Protocol
- Noncontrast CT head must be performed immediately to exclude hemorrhage and assess ASPECTS 2
- CTA should be obtained simultaneously to identify large vessel occlusion 2
- For extended window patients, CTP or DW-MRI with perfusion is required to determine eligibility 1, 2
- Only blood glucose measurement must precede treatment—other labs (CBC, electrolytes, INR, aPTT) should be obtained but must not delay reperfusion therapy 1, 2
Reperfusion Goal
The technical goal is achieving mTICI 2b/3 reperfusion to maximize probability of good functional outcome. 1, 3 In the HERMES pooled analysis, 71% of patients achieved mTICI 2b/3 reperfusion. 1
Relationship to IV Thrombolysis
- Eligible patients should receive IV alteplase even if thrombectomy is planned 1
- Do NOT evaluate response to IV thrombolysis before proceeding with catheter angiography—observing for clinical response is not required and not recommended 1, 3
Common Pitfalls and Caveats
Perfusion Imaging Interpretation Errors
Recanalization of LVO before or during imaging can cause CTP post-processing software to erroneously underestimate or show normal core infarct volume. 4 This occurs in approximately 5.9% of cases and represents a critical caveat not widely reported. 4 The entire composite of hyperacute CT imaging must be examined while making decisions, not relying solely on automated software output. 4
Large Core Considerations
Recent research suggests that patients with large core (>50 mL) may still benefit from thrombectomy if significant perfusion mismatch exists (mismatch ratio >1.2). 5, 6 However, current AHA/ASA guidelines maintain strict DAWN/DEFUSE-3 criteria with core volume limits. 1 The interaction between treatment effect and mismatch ratio is significant (p<0.001), with adjusted OR of 6.8 for good outcome when mismatch ratio >1.2 versus 0.7 when absent. 5
Mismatch Profile Importance
Even in the early window (<6 hours), perfusion mismatch profiles predict clinical response to thrombectomy. 7 Approximately 80% of LVO patients have evidence of penumbra regardless of infarction volume, and both target mismatch (adjusted OR 3.3) and any mismatch (adjusted OR 5.9) independently predict functional recovery. 7 Reperfusion benefits patients with mismatch but not those without it. 7
Low NIHSS Scores
Do not exclude thrombectomy based solely on low NIHSS scores in the presence of confirmed LVO and significant penumbra on perfusion imaging. 8 Case evidence demonstrates successful outcomes even with NIHSS of 0 when perfusion imaging shows large penumbra (70 mL) with minimal core. 8
Age Considerations
Advanced age >80 years alone should not be an exclusion criterion—elderly patients comprise the majority of stroke victims and may still benefit from thrombectomy. 3