What is the diagnosis and management of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) of the breast in premenopausal women?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 26, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia (PASH) of the Breast

What is PASH?

PASH is a benign, hormonally-responsive mesenchymal proliferative lesion of the breast that predominantly affects premenopausal and perimenopausal women, presenting most commonly as a palpable mass or incidental imaging finding that mimics fibroadenoma. 1, 2

  • PASH occurs in approximately 95-96% of premenopausal or perimenopausal women, with rare cases in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy 1, 2
  • The lesion demonstrates positive staining for estrogen and progesterone receptors in 95% of cases, supporting its hormonal etiology 2
  • Approximately 53% of patients present with abnormalities on screening mammography, while 44% present with palpable masses 1

Clinical Presentation

Document the following specific features during physical examination:

  • Mass characteristics: Well-defined, discrete margins with round or oval shape on palpation 3
  • Size measurement: Lesions range from 0.3 cm to 11 cm in reported series 2, 4
  • Growth pattern: Note any documented increase in size over time, as 5 of 7 patients in one series showed progressive growth 4
  • Patient age and hormonal status: Median age is 45 years (range 12-65), with 95% occurring in premenopausal women 5

Imaging Features

PASH appears similar to fibroadenoma on all imaging modalities, making definitive diagnosis impossible without tissue sampling. 1

Mammography

  • Noncalcified, circumscribed mass in most cases 1, 4
  • Border characteristics vary: well-circumscribed (43%), partly circumscribed (29%), or indistinct (29%) when obscured by overlying parenchyma 4

Ultrasound

  • Oval, circumscribed, hypoechoic solid mass 1, 4
  • All four lesions visible on ultrasound in one series were solid and circumscribed 4

MRI

  • Progressive (Type 1) enhancement pattern 1
  • High-signal slit-like spaces on T2-weighted and STIR images corresponding to empty clefts within acellular hyalinized stroma 1

Diagnostic Approach

Core needle biopsy is the preferred initial diagnostic method, but has a 35% false-negative rate for PASH, requiring surgical excision for definitive diagnosis in many cases. 5

Biopsy Strategy

  • Core needle biopsy confirmed PASH diagnosis in only 65% of cases in one large series 5
  • The remaining 35% required operative excision for definitive diagnosis 5
  • All pathologic specimens should be reviewed by an experienced pathologist aware of the mass lesion, as PASH can be mistaken for low-grade angiosarcoma 1, 4

Critical Pathologic Distinction

  • PASH has pseudoangiomatous slit-like clefts (not true vascular spaces) distinguishing it from angiosarcoma 1
  • Staining for CD34 and lymphatic marker D2-40 helps confirm diagnosis 2

Management Algorithm

For biopsy-proven PASH with concordant imaging (BI-RADS 2-3), observation with 6-month interval imaging is appropriate; surgical excision is indicated for growth, suspicious radiologic features, inconclusive biopsy, larger lesions, or patients at increased breast cancer risk. 1, 5

Observation Criteria (All Must Be Met)

  • Core biopsy confirms PASH diagnosis 5
  • No suspicious radiologic features 5
  • Concordance between pathology and imaging 3
  • Patient not at high risk for breast cancer 2

Follow-up Protocol for Observed Lesions

  • Imaging at 6-month intervals initially 5
  • Continue surveillance given recurrence rates of 13-26% 5
  • Two patients in one series developed local recurrence 4

Indications for Surgical Excision

  • Growth documented on serial imaging or physical examination 4, 5
  • Suspicious radiologic findings 5
  • Inconclusive or negative core biopsy (35% of cases) 5
  • Larger lesions (no specific size cutoff defined, but consider excision for masses >2 cm based on fibroadenoma guidelines) 3, 1
  • Patients at increased risk for breast cancer 1, 2
  • Patient anxiety or request for removal 3

Surgical Technique

  • Local excision with tumor-free margins 2
  • Meticulous hemostasis and specimen orientation for pathologist 6

Associated Findings and Cancer Risk

PASH may coexist with breast cancer or precancerous lesions in 30% of cases, mandating careful evaluation of all tissue. 5

  • One patient had synchronous ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) 2
  • Additional benign findings include stromal fibrosis and atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia 2
  • If atypical features are found on final pathology, follow risk-reduction guidelines per NCCN 3, 7

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on imaging alone to exclude malignancy: PASH mimics fibroadenoma and cannot be distinguished radiologically 1
  • Do not assume negative core biopsy excludes PASH: 35% require surgical excision for diagnosis 5
  • Do not ignore documented growth: This warrants surgical excision regardless of benign appearance 4, 5
  • Do not forget to assess for concurrent pathology: 30% have associated cancer or precancerous lesions 5
  • Ensure pathologist is aware of mass lesion: PASH can be missed or misdiagnosed as angiosarcoma without clinical correlation 1, 4

Recurrence and Long-term Outcomes

  • Progression rate: 26% in observation arm versus 13% in excision arm 5
  • Local recurrence occurs in 13-26% of cases, necessitating close surveillance 5
  • If simple PASH is confirmed without atypia, return to routine age-appropriate screening after initial surveillance period 3

References

Guideline

Management of Fibroadenomas

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Management of Suspicious Breast Lesions and Incidental Findings

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Treatment and Management of Premalignant Breast Lesions

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What is the management of focal pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH)?
What is the management of Pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH) in premenopausal women?
What is the management of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH)?
What is the diagnosis and treatment for Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia (PASH) of the breast?
What are the implications of a Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia (PASH) diagnosis in a breast biopsy?
What is the recommended treatment approach for a patient with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer using palbociclib?
When is a single lung transplant versus a double lung transplant recommended for patients with severe lung disease, such as cystic fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or pulmonary hypertension, considering factors like age, lung function as measured by forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), cardiac function, and overall performance status?
Can a sexually active patient with a history of herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV2) infections take suppressive antiviral medication, such as valacyclovir (valacyclovir), 3 days before sexual activity to lower viral shedding?
What is the recommended treatment for uncomplicated malaria in adults?
Can a breast implant cause destruction of a lung lobe in a patient with a history of breast implant surgery and underlying respiratory or autoimmune conditions?
What are the considerations for using nebivolol (beta-blocker) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.