Pseudoangiomatous Stromal Hyperplasia (PASH) of the Breast
What is PASH?
PASH is a benign, hormonally-responsive mesenchymal proliferative lesion of the breast that predominantly affects premenopausal and perimenopausal women, presenting most commonly as a palpable mass or incidental imaging finding that mimics fibroadenoma. 1, 2
- PASH occurs in approximately 95-96% of premenopausal or perimenopausal women, with rare cases in postmenopausal women on hormone replacement therapy 1, 2
- The lesion demonstrates positive staining for estrogen and progesterone receptors in 95% of cases, supporting its hormonal etiology 2
- Approximately 53% of patients present with abnormalities on screening mammography, while 44% present with palpable masses 1
Clinical Presentation
Document the following specific features during physical examination:
- Mass characteristics: Well-defined, discrete margins with round or oval shape on palpation 3
- Size measurement: Lesions range from 0.3 cm to 11 cm in reported series 2, 4
- Growth pattern: Note any documented increase in size over time, as 5 of 7 patients in one series showed progressive growth 4
- Patient age and hormonal status: Median age is 45 years (range 12-65), with 95% occurring in premenopausal women 5
Imaging Features
PASH appears similar to fibroadenoma on all imaging modalities, making definitive diagnosis impossible without tissue sampling. 1
Mammography
- Noncalcified, circumscribed mass in most cases 1, 4
- Border characteristics vary: well-circumscribed (43%), partly circumscribed (29%), or indistinct (29%) when obscured by overlying parenchyma 4
Ultrasound
- Oval, circumscribed, hypoechoic solid mass 1, 4
- All four lesions visible on ultrasound in one series were solid and circumscribed 4
MRI
- Progressive (Type 1) enhancement pattern 1
- High-signal slit-like spaces on T2-weighted and STIR images corresponding to empty clefts within acellular hyalinized stroma 1
Diagnostic Approach
Core needle biopsy is the preferred initial diagnostic method, but has a 35% false-negative rate for PASH, requiring surgical excision for definitive diagnosis in many cases. 5
Biopsy Strategy
- Core needle biopsy confirmed PASH diagnosis in only 65% of cases in one large series 5
- The remaining 35% required operative excision for definitive diagnosis 5
- All pathologic specimens should be reviewed by an experienced pathologist aware of the mass lesion, as PASH can be mistaken for low-grade angiosarcoma 1, 4
Critical Pathologic Distinction
- PASH has pseudoangiomatous slit-like clefts (not true vascular spaces) distinguishing it from angiosarcoma 1
- Staining for CD34 and lymphatic marker D2-40 helps confirm diagnosis 2
Management Algorithm
For biopsy-proven PASH with concordant imaging (BI-RADS 2-3), observation with 6-month interval imaging is appropriate; surgical excision is indicated for growth, suspicious radiologic features, inconclusive biopsy, larger lesions, or patients at increased breast cancer risk. 1, 5
Observation Criteria (All Must Be Met)
- Core biopsy confirms PASH diagnosis 5
- No suspicious radiologic features 5
- Concordance between pathology and imaging 3
- Patient not at high risk for breast cancer 2
Follow-up Protocol for Observed Lesions
- Imaging at 6-month intervals initially 5
- Continue surveillance given recurrence rates of 13-26% 5
- Two patients in one series developed local recurrence 4
Indications for Surgical Excision
- Growth documented on serial imaging or physical examination 4, 5
- Suspicious radiologic findings 5
- Inconclusive or negative core biopsy (35% of cases) 5
- Larger lesions (no specific size cutoff defined, but consider excision for masses >2 cm based on fibroadenoma guidelines) 3, 1
- Patients at increased risk for breast cancer 1, 2
- Patient anxiety or request for removal 3
Surgical Technique
- Local excision with tumor-free margins 2
- Meticulous hemostasis and specimen orientation for pathologist 6
Associated Findings and Cancer Risk
PASH may coexist with breast cancer or precancerous lesions in 30% of cases, mandating careful evaluation of all tissue. 5
- One patient had synchronous ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) 2
- Additional benign findings include stromal fibrosis and atypical ductal or lobular hyperplasia 2
- If atypical features are found on final pathology, follow risk-reduction guidelines per NCCN 3, 7
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely on imaging alone to exclude malignancy: PASH mimics fibroadenoma and cannot be distinguished radiologically 1
- Do not assume negative core biopsy excludes PASH: 35% require surgical excision for diagnosis 5
- Do not ignore documented growth: This warrants surgical excision regardless of benign appearance 4, 5
- Do not forget to assess for concurrent pathology: 30% have associated cancer or precancerous lesions 5
- Ensure pathologist is aware of mass lesion: PASH can be missed or misdiagnosed as angiosarcoma without clinical correlation 1, 4