Ferrous Sulfate vs Ferrous Gluconate for Iron Deficiency Anemia
Ferrous sulfate 200 mg once daily is the preferred first-line treatment for iron deficiency anemia due to its higher elemental iron content (65 mg vs 38 mg per tablet), lower cost, and equivalent efficacy and tolerability compared to ferrous gluconate. 1, 2, 3
Elemental Iron Content and Cost-Effectiveness
- Ferrous sulfate 324 mg tablets contain 65 mg of elemental iron, while ferrous gluconate 324 mg tablets contain only 38 mg of elemental iron 4, 3
- Ferrous sulfate is consistently the least expensive oral iron formulation available, making it the most cost-effective choice 1, 2
- No clinical trial evidence demonstrates that ferrous gluconate has superior efficacy or tolerability compared to ferrous sulfate 1, 2
Evidence-Based Dosing Recommendations
- The recommended dose is ferrous sulfate 200 mg (approximately 65 mg elemental iron) once daily, not three to four times daily as traditionally prescribed 1, 2
- Once-daily dosing improves tolerance while maintaining equal or better iron absorption compared to multiple daily doses, because hepcidin levels remain elevated for 48 hours after iron intake, blocking further absorption 1, 2
- Multiple daily doses increase gastrointestinal side effects (constipation 12%, diarrhea 8%, nausea 11%) without improving efficacy 1, 2
When to Consider Ferrous Gluconate
- Ferrous gluconate may be tried if ferrous sulfate causes intolerable gastrointestinal side effects, though there is no clinical trial evidence that it is better tolerated 1, 2
- If switching formulations, ferrous fumarate (106 mg elemental iron per 324 mg tablet) is another equally effective alternative 1, 2
- The standard practice of switching to a different traditional iron salt is not supported by evidence 1
Special Considerations for Impaired Renal Function
- In patients with chronic kidney disease, functional iron deficiency is common and defined by ferritin 100-300 ng/mL with transferrin saturation <20% 2
- IV iron is preferred for dialysis patients; either IV or oral iron is appropriate for non-dialysis CKD stages 3-5 2
- Oral iron absorption may be impaired in CKD due to elevated hepcidin levels from chronic inflammation 2
Optimizing Oral Iron Therapy
- Add vitamin C (ascorbic acid) 500 mg with each iron dose to enhance absorption, especially when response is suboptimal 1, 2
- Take iron on an empty stomach for optimal absorption, though taking with food is acceptable if gastrointestinal side effects occur 1, 2
- Avoid taking iron with tea, coffee, calcium, or fiber-containing foods, which reduce absorption 1, 2
Expected Response and Monitoring
- Hemoglobin should rise by approximately 2 g/dL after 3-4 weeks of treatment 1, 2
- Continue oral iron for 3 months after hemoglobin normalizes to fully replenish iron stores 1, 2
- Check hemoglobin at 4 weeks; failure to rise by at least 10 g/L after 2 weeks strongly predicts subsequent treatment failure (sensitivity 90.1%, specificity 79.3%) 1, 2
When to Switch to Intravenous Iron
- Intolerance to at least two different oral iron preparations (including both ferrous sulfate and ferrous gluconate) is an indication for IV iron 1, 2
- Failure of ferritin levels to improve after 4 weeks of compliant oral therapy warrants switching to IV iron 2
- Active inflammatory bowel disease with hemoglobin <10 g/dL requires IV iron as first-line treatment 1, 2
- Post-bariatric surgery patients should receive IV iron due to disrupted duodenal absorption mechanisms 2
- Chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis should receive IV iron preferentially 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not prescribe ferrous gluconate three to four times daily as indicated on the FDA label 4—this increases side effects without improving efficacy due to hepcidin-mediated absorption blockade 1, 2
- Do not assume ferrous gluconate is better tolerated than ferrous sulfate without evidence 1, 2
- Do not stop iron therapy when hemoglobin normalizes—continue for 3 months to replenish stores 1, 2
- Do not overlook vitamin C supplementation when oral iron response is suboptimal 1, 2