Advanced Melanoma Management
First-Line Treatment Selection
For patients with advanced melanoma, initiate treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1 monotherapy or nivolumab/ipilimumab combination) for all patients, reserving BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations specifically for BRAF V600-mutant patients with rapidly progressive or symptomatic disease. 1
Mandatory Initial Testing
- All patients must undergo BRAF mutation testing using an FDA-approved test or CLIA-approved facility before treatment selection to identify any BRAF V600 mutation (V600E, V600K, V600R, V600D, or others). 1
- Positive VE1 immunohistochemistry is sufficient to start targeted therapy in symptomatic or rapidly progressing patients, but all VE1 results (positive and negative) require confirmation by sequencing due to false positive/negative risk. 2
- Tissue should be obtained from biopsy of a current metastasis (preferred) or archival material. 2
Treatment Algorithm by BRAF Status
BRAF Wild-Type Melanoma
Recommended first-line options (all Category 1/Strong recommendations): 1
- Nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks 2
- Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks 2
- Nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks 2, 1
BRAF V600-Mutant Melanoma
Treatment selection depends critically on disease tempo and symptomatology: 1
For rapidly progressive or symptomatic disease:
- BRAF/MEK inhibitor combinations are preferred due to rapid response (median time to response ≈1.5 months vs. 2.1-3.5 months for immunotherapy) and high initial response rates. 2, 1
Approved BRAF/MEK combinations: 1
- Dabrafenib 150 mg PO twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg PO once daily
- Encorafenib 450 mg PO once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg PO twice daily
- Vemurafenib 960 mg PO twice daily plus cobimetinib 60 mg PO once daily (21 days on, 7 days off)
For low-volume, asymptomatic metastatic disease:
- Immunotherapy is preferred (same options as BRAF wild-type above) as checkpoint inhibitors are effective regardless of BRAF mutation status and may provide more durable responses. 2, 1
Choosing Between Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy vs. Nivolumab/Ipilimumab Combination
Selection should be based on the following factors: 2, 1
- Patient's overall health and comorbidities: Patients with autoimmune disease history or significant comorbidities favor anti-PD-1 monotherapy. 2
- Ability to comply with proactive monitoring: Combination therapy requires intensive monitoring for immune-related adverse events. 2, 1
- Tolerance for toxicity: Nivolumab/ipilimumab has grade ≥3 adverse events in 65% vs. 32% for anti-PD-1 monotherapy. 2, 1
- Disease burden: Higher disease burden or more aggressive disease tempo may warrant combination therapy despite higher toxicity. 3
Key consideration: Although nivolumab/ipilimumab combination provides somewhat better progression-free survival, there is currently no evidence of improvement in overall survival compared to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. 2
Critical Treatment Pitfalls to Avoid
Never use the following approaches: 1
- Ipilimumab monotherapy as first-line treatment - CheckMate 067 trial showed superior outcomes with anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination therapy. 2
- BRAF inhibitor monotherapy unless combination therapy is absolutely contraindicated - combination therapy has superior response rate, PFS, and OS with similar or better toxicity profile. 2, 1
- MEK inhibitor monotherapy - poor efficacy with response rate of only 22% and median PFS of 2.8 months. 1
Second-Line Treatment After Progression
After progression on anti-PD-1 therapy in BRAF-mutant patients:
- Switch to BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination therapy, or alternatively offer ipilimumab or ipilimumab-containing regimens. 1
After progression on BRAF/MEK inhibitors:
- Switch to anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy. 1
- Important caveat: Patients who progressed rapidly on first-line BRAF inhibitors derive minimal benefit from second-line BRAF/MEK combinations. 1
BRAF/MEK Combination Efficacy Data
The superiority of BRAF/MEK combinations over monotherapy is established by multiple phase III trials: 2
- COMBI-d trial: Dabrafenib/trametinib showed 69% response rate, median response duration 12.9 months, median PFS 11.0 months, and median OS 25.1 months. 2
- Vemurafenib/cobimetinib trial: 68% response rate vs. 45% for vemurafenib alone, median PFS 9.9 months vs. 6.2 months, with significant OS benefit (81% vs. 73% at specified timepoint, p=0.046). 2
Treatment Duration Considerations
For immunotherapy: 1
- Treatment may continue beyond 2 years based on clinical trials, though pembrolizumab was limited to 24 months maximum in KEYNOTE-002. 2
- Discontinuation is common (45-77% in trials with median follow-up <2 years), and clinical experience beyond 1 year is currently limited. 2
- No high-quality melanoma-specific data exist on optimal duration. 1
For BRAF/MEK inhibitors:
- Continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. 2
Special Populations
Brain metastases:
- Both BRAF/MEK inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors (including ipilimumab/nivolumab) can be safely used in patients with symptomatic brain metastases and have shown significant efficacy. 2
- Stereotactic irradiation of progressive brain metastases is reasonable if systemic therapy achieves partial disease control. 2
Injectable lesions:
- For patients with injectable cutaneous/subcutaneous/nodal lesions, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) may be offered as primary therapy if patients are not eligible for or decline systemic therapies, or for disease control in limited stage IV disease. 1